汝不应！- 研究不当行为丑闻的后遗症如何影响研究诚信培训

IF 3.9 1区哲学 Q1 ETHICS

Journal of Responsible Innovation Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1080/23299460.2024.2414500

Serge P.J.M. Horbach, Rachel Fishberg, Sven Ulpts, Lise Degn

引用次数: 0

摘要

涉及研究不当行为案件的丑闻通常被认为是促进研究诚信的政策倡议和制度变革的主要推动力。这些丑闻的影响是...

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Thou Shalt Not! – How the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity training

Scandals involving cases of research misconduct are often considered to be main drivers for policy initiatives and institutional changes to foster research integrity. These impacts of scandals are ...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Responsible Innovation Multiple-

CiteScore

8.60

自引率

20.50%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Responsible Innovation (JRI) provides a forum for discussions of the normative assessment and governance of knowledge-based innovation. JRI offers humanists, social scientists, policy analysts and legal scholars, and natural scientists and engineers an opportunity to articulate, strengthen, and critique the relations among approaches to responsible innovation, thus giving further shape to a newly emerging community of research and practice. These approaches include ethics, technology assessment, governance, sustainability, socio-technical integration, and others. JRI intends responsible innovation to be inclusive of such terms as responsible development and sustainable development, and the journal invites comparisons and contrasts among such concepts. While issues of risk and environmental health and safety are relevant, JRI especially encourages attention to the assessment of the broader and more subtle human and social dimensions of innovation—including moral, cultural, political, and religious dimensions, social risk, and sustainability addressed in a systemic fashion.