预防的 "药方":科维德-19 大流行病中的人工免疫。

IF 0.5 4区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Sofia Varino
{"title":"预防的 \"药方\":科维德-19 大流行病中的人工免疫。","authors":"Sofia Varino","doi":"10.1590/S0104-59702024000100055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of pharmakon encapsulates the paradoxical ambivalence of any therapeutic intervention's harmful as well as beneficial effects; within the context of immunological practices related to covid-19, this ambivalence has been successfully exploited by anti-vaccination movements and is also evident in widespread vaccine hesitancy in wealthy countries where vaccines for this virus are widely available. Here we engage with the theoretical apparatus of the pharmakon to examine how care, harm, risk, and prevention are enacted in covid-19 prevention measures and mobilize the transdisciplinary methodologies of science and technology studies to investigate how anticipatory imaginaries drive cutting-edge research on covid-19 vaccines and the clinical and social practices they have elicited.</p>","PeriodicalId":13134,"journal":{"name":"Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The \\\"pharmakon\\\" of prevention: artificial immunity in the covid-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Varino\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S0104-59702024000100055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The concept of pharmakon encapsulates the paradoxical ambivalence of any therapeutic intervention's harmful as well as beneficial effects; within the context of immunological practices related to covid-19, this ambivalence has been successfully exploited by anti-vaccination movements and is also evident in widespread vaccine hesitancy in wealthy countries where vaccines for this virus are widely available. Here we engage with the theoretical apparatus of the pharmakon to examine how care, harm, risk, and prevention are enacted in covid-19 prevention measures and mobilize the transdisciplinary methodologies of science and technology studies to investigate how anticipatory imaginaries drive cutting-edge research on covid-19 vaccines and the clinical and social practices they have elicited.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472722/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702024000100055\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702024000100055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

pharmakon "的概念概括了任何治疗干预措施既有害又有益的矛盾性;在与covid-19相关的免疫学实践中,这种矛盾性已被反疫苗接种运动成功利用,在广泛提供该病毒疫苗的富裕国家中,疫苗接种的普遍犹豫也证明了这一点。在此,我们将运用药理学的理论机制,研究在covid-19预防措施中如何体现关爱、伤害、风险和预防,并运用科学与技术研究的跨学科方法,探讨预期性想象如何推动covid-19疫苗的前沿研究及其引发的临床和社会实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The "pharmakon" of prevention: artificial immunity in the covid-19 pandemic.

The concept of pharmakon encapsulates the paradoxical ambivalence of any therapeutic intervention's harmful as well as beneficial effects; within the context of immunological practices related to covid-19, this ambivalence has been successfully exploited by anti-vaccination movements and is also evident in widespread vaccine hesitancy in wealthy countries where vaccines for this virus are widely available. Here we engage with the theoretical apparatus of the pharmakon to examine how care, harm, risk, and prevention are enacted in covid-19 prevention measures and mobilize the transdisciplinary methodologies of science and technology studies to investigate how anticipatory imaginaries drive cutting-edge research on covid-19 vaccines and the clinical and social practices they have elicited.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos
Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信