[颈动脉内膜切除术:全身麻醉与局部麻醉,哪种方法最好?]

Revue medicale de Liege Pub Date : 2024-10-01
Youness Khaoulani, Margaux Mestdag, Simon Lacroix, Éric Deflandre
{"title":"[颈动脉内膜切除术:全身麻醉与局部麻醉,哪种方法最好?]","authors":"Youness Khaoulani, Margaux Mestdag, Simon Lacroix, Éric Deflandre","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores two anesthetic strategies for carotid endarterectomy: cervical plexus block and general anesthesia. Regional anesthesia is increasingly favoured for its ability to enable continuous neurological monitoring and maintain hemodynamic stability. General anesthesia remains essential for certain patients, offering comfort, optimal control of physiological conditions, and extended cerebral protection. We also discuss pathophysiological considerations, crucial elements for understanding patient responses to these techniques. The development of ultrasound-guided cervical plexus block emerges as a promising alternative to general anesthesia, enhancing the options available for safer and more effective anesthetic management. However, an individualized approach remains crucial to optimize clinical outcomes. This approach is part of the concept of «personalized medicine», in which contemporary anesthesia must necessarily be adapted to the specific needs of each individual.</p>","PeriodicalId":94201,"journal":{"name":"Revue medicale de Liege","volume":"79 10","pages":"645-651"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Carotid endarterectomy : General versus local anesthesia, which is the best ?]\",\"authors\":\"Youness Khaoulani, Margaux Mestdag, Simon Lacroix, Éric Deflandre\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article explores two anesthetic strategies for carotid endarterectomy: cervical plexus block and general anesthesia. Regional anesthesia is increasingly favoured for its ability to enable continuous neurological monitoring and maintain hemodynamic stability. General anesthesia remains essential for certain patients, offering comfort, optimal control of physiological conditions, and extended cerebral protection. We also discuss pathophysiological considerations, crucial elements for understanding patient responses to these techniques. The development of ultrasound-guided cervical plexus block emerges as a promising alternative to general anesthesia, enhancing the options available for safer and more effective anesthetic management. However, an individualized approach remains crucial to optimize clinical outcomes. This approach is part of the concept of «personalized medicine», in which contemporary anesthesia must necessarily be adapted to the specific needs of each individual.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue medicale de Liege\",\"volume\":\"79 10\",\"pages\":\"645-651\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue medicale de Liege\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue medicale de Liege","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了颈动脉内膜切除术的两种麻醉策略:颈丛阻滞和全身麻醉。区域麻醉能够实现持续的神经监测并保持血液动力学稳定,因此越来越受到青睐。全身麻醉对于某些患者来说仍然是必不可少的,因为它能提供舒适感、最佳的生理条件控制和更广泛的大脑保护。我们还讨论了病理生理学方面的考虑因素,这些因素对于了解患者对这些技术的反应至关重要。超声引导下颈丛阻滞技术的发展有望替代全身麻醉,为更安全、更有效的麻醉管理提供了更多选择。然而,个性化方法对于优化临床效果仍然至关重要。这种方法是 "个性化医疗 "概念的一部分,即当代麻醉必须适应每个人的特定需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Carotid endarterectomy : General versus local anesthesia, which is the best ?]

This article explores two anesthetic strategies for carotid endarterectomy: cervical plexus block and general anesthesia. Regional anesthesia is increasingly favoured for its ability to enable continuous neurological monitoring and maintain hemodynamic stability. General anesthesia remains essential for certain patients, offering comfort, optimal control of physiological conditions, and extended cerebral protection. We also discuss pathophysiological considerations, crucial elements for understanding patient responses to these techniques. The development of ultrasound-guided cervical plexus block emerges as a promising alternative to general anesthesia, enhancing the options available for safer and more effective anesthetic management. However, an individualized approach remains crucial to optimize clinical outcomes. This approach is part of the concept of «personalized medicine», in which contemporary anesthesia must necessarily be adapted to the specific needs of each individual.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信