总分是心理测量学还是直觉测验理论的伟大成就？

IF 2.9 2区心理学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS

Psychometrika Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1007/s11336-024-10003-8

Robert J Mislevy

引用次数: 0

摘要

Sijtsma、Ellis 和 Borsboom (Psychometrika, 89:84-117, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-024-09964-7 ) 在《心理测量学》上对总分的价值和属性以及经典测验理论进行了深入的探讨，很少有实践心理测量学家会对这些内容感到熟悉。在本说明中，我将从证据推理的角度对他们的文章发表评论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Are Sum Scores a Great Accomplishment of Psychometrics or Intuitive Test Theory?

Sijtsma, Ellis, and Borsboom (Psychometrika, 89:84-117, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-024-09964-7 ) provide a thoughtful treatment in Psychometrika of the value and properties of sum scores and classical test theory at a depth at which few practicing psychometricians are familiar. In this note, I offer comments on their article from the perspective of evidentiary reasoning.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Psychometrika 数学-数学跨学科应用

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

10.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The journal Psychometrika is devoted to the advancement of theory and methodology for behavioral data in psychology, education and the social and behavioral sciences generally. Its coverage is offered in two sections: Theory and Methods (T& M), and Application Reviews and Case Studies (ARCS). T&M articles present original research and reviews on the development of quantitative models, statistical methods, and mathematical techniques for evaluating data from psychology, the social and behavioral sciences and related fields. Application Reviews can be integrative, drawing together disparate methodologies for applications, or comparative and evaluative, discussing advantages and disadvantages of one or more methodologies in applications. Case Studies highlight methodology that deepens understanding of substantive phenomena through more informative data analysis, or more elegant data description.