调强放射治疗(IMRT)治疗计划的调制复杂度评分(MCS)与区段数和局部伽马通过率的相关性。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Omar Najah Jubbier, Ali Majeed Hassan, Siham Sabah Abdullah, Haydar Hamza Alabedi, Nabaa Mohammad Ali Alazawy, Mustafa Jabbar Al-Musawi
{"title":"调强放射治疗(IMRT)治疗计划的调制复杂度评分(MCS)与区段数和局部伽马通过率的相关性。","authors":"Omar Najah Jubbier, Ali Majeed Hassan, Siham Sabah Abdullah, Haydar Hamza Alabedi, Nabaa Mohammad Ali Alazawy, Mustafa Jabbar Al-Musawi","doi":"10.47391/JPMA-BAGH-16-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the modulation complexity scores across treatment sites, and to examine their connection with monitor unit, segment number and global and local gamma passing percentage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study was conducted at the Baghdad Centre for Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine, Baghdad Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq, from May 2021 to February 2022. Included were 34 patients, with the age range between 20 - 50 years, subjected to intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck tumours in group A or pelvic tumours in group B. Treatment planning was done using Monaco 5.1, and radiotherapy was done using Synergy linear accelerator. Modulation complexity scores were calculated using MATLAB 2019a. Data was analysed using SPSS 24.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 34 patients, 22(64.7%) were in group A; 12(54.5%) males and 10(45.5%) females. There were 12(35.3%) patients in group B; 8(66.7%) females and 4(33.3%) males. The number of segments was greater in group B than group A. A modest positive linear association was seen in group A, demonstrating that an increase in segment numbers resulted in a rise in modulation complexity score (R2=0.0244). Group B tumours had inverse negative linear correlation (R2=0.0189). As the complexity of plans increased in group A, local gamma passing percentage decreased (R2=0.0452). Group B showed a slight negative connection with modulation complexity score (R2=0.0622).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modulation complexity score may be used to provide a simple prediction for pre-treatment verification, and it may also serve as a simple quality assurance tool for intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":54369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association","volume":"74 10 (Supple-8)","pages":"S26-S29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The correlation of the modulation complexity score (MCS) with the number of segments and local gamma passing rate for the Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) treatment planning delivery.\",\"authors\":\"Omar Najah Jubbier, Ali Majeed Hassan, Siham Sabah Abdullah, Haydar Hamza Alabedi, Nabaa Mohammad Ali Alazawy, Mustafa Jabbar Al-Musawi\",\"doi\":\"10.47391/JPMA-BAGH-16-72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the modulation complexity scores across treatment sites, and to examine their connection with monitor unit, segment number and global and local gamma passing percentage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study was conducted at the Baghdad Centre for Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine, Baghdad Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq, from May 2021 to February 2022. Included were 34 patients, with the age range between 20 - 50 years, subjected to intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck tumours in group A or pelvic tumours in group B. Treatment planning was done using Monaco 5.1, and radiotherapy was done using Synergy linear accelerator. Modulation complexity scores were calculated using MATLAB 2019a. Data was analysed using SPSS 24.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 34 patients, 22(64.7%) were in group A; 12(54.5%) males and 10(45.5%) females. There were 12(35.3%) patients in group B; 8(66.7%) females and 4(33.3%) males. The number of segments was greater in group B than group A. A modest positive linear association was seen in group A, demonstrating that an increase in segment numbers resulted in a rise in modulation complexity score (R2=0.0244). Group B tumours had inverse negative linear correlation (R2=0.0189). As the complexity of plans increased in group A, local gamma passing percentage decreased (R2=0.0452). Group B showed a slight negative connection with modulation complexity score (R2=0.0622).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modulation complexity score may be used to provide a simple prediction for pre-treatment verification, and it may also serve as a simple quality assurance tool for intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"74 10 (Supple-8)\",\"pages\":\"S26-S29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA-BAGH-16-72\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA-BAGH-16-72","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较不同治疗部位的调制复杂性得分,并研究其与监测器单元、区段数量以及整体和局部伽马通过率之间的联系:这项横断面研究于 2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 2 月在伊拉克巴格达巴格达医疗城巴格达放射治疗与核医学中心进行。A组患者为头颈部肿瘤,B组患者为盆腔肿瘤,34名患者接受了调强放射治疗,年龄在20-50岁之间。调制复杂度分数使用 MATLAB 2019a 计算。使用 SPSS 24 对数据进行分析:在 34 名患者中,22 人(64.7%)属于 A 组,其中男性 12 人(54.5%),女性 10 人(45.5%)。B 组患者有 12 人(35.3%),其中女性 8 人(66.7%),男性 4 人(33.3%)。B 组肿瘤的节段数多于 A 组。A 组出现了适度的正线性关系,表明节段数增加会导致调制复杂度评分上升(R2=0.0244)。B 组肿瘤呈反向负线性相关(R2=0.0189)。随着 A 组计划复杂度的增加,局部伽马通过率下降(R2=0.0452)。B组与调制复杂度评分呈轻微负相关(R2=0.0622):调强复杂性评分可用于治疗前验证的简单预测,也可作为调强放射治疗计划的简单质量保证工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The correlation of the modulation complexity score (MCS) with the number of segments and local gamma passing rate for the Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) treatment planning delivery.

Objective: To compare the modulation complexity scores across treatment sites, and to examine their connection with monitor unit, segment number and global and local gamma passing percentage.

Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted at the Baghdad Centre for Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine, Baghdad Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq, from May 2021 to February 2022. Included were 34 patients, with the age range between 20 - 50 years, subjected to intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck tumours in group A or pelvic tumours in group B. Treatment planning was done using Monaco 5.1, and radiotherapy was done using Synergy linear accelerator. Modulation complexity scores were calculated using MATLAB 2019a. Data was analysed using SPSS 24.

Results: Of the 34 patients, 22(64.7%) were in group A; 12(54.5%) males and 10(45.5%) females. There were 12(35.3%) patients in group B; 8(66.7%) females and 4(33.3%) males. The number of segments was greater in group B than group A. A modest positive linear association was seen in group A, demonstrating that an increase in segment numbers resulted in a rise in modulation complexity score (R2=0.0244). Group B tumours had inverse negative linear correlation (R2=0.0189). As the complexity of plans increased in group A, local gamma passing percentage decreased (R2=0.0452). Group B showed a slight negative connection with modulation complexity score (R2=0.0622).

Conclusions: The modulation complexity score may be used to provide a simple prediction for pre-treatment verification, and it may also serve as a simple quality assurance tool for intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
983
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Primarily being a medical journal, JPMA publishes scholarly research focusing on the various fields in the areas of health and medical education. It publishes original research describing recent advances in health particularly clinical studies, clinical trials, assessments of pathogens of diagnostic importance, medical genetics and epidemiological studies. Review articles highlighting importance of various issues in the domain of public health, drug research and medical education are also accepted. As a leading journal of South Asia, JPMA remains cognizant of the recent advances in the rapidly growing fields of biomedical sciences, it invites and encourages scholars to write short reviews and invited editorials on the emerging issues. We particularly aim to promote health standards of developing countries by encouraging manuscript submissions on issues affecting the public health and health delivery services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信