Osia®2骨导助听器磁共振成像上的伪影:尸体研究

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Beata Diosi, Zsofia Bere, Angela Csomor, Tamara Tapai, Zoltan Toth, Edina Kovacs, Balint Posta, Miklos Csanady, Antal Nogradi, Zsigmond Tamas Kincses, Laszlo Rovo, Adam Perenyi
{"title":"Osia®2骨导助听器磁共振成像上的伪影:尸体研究","authors":"Beata Diosi, Zsofia Bere, Angela Csomor, Tamara Tapai, Zoltan Toth, Edina Kovacs, Balint Posta, Miklos Csanady, Antal Nogradi, Zsigmond Tamas Kincses, Laszlo Rovo, Adam Perenyi","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2398833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hearing implants often limit the assessment of magnetic resonance examinations due to susceptibility artefacts. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of artefacts attributed to the Osia®2 implant system in terms of utility in visualizing selected cranial structures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A BI300 implant and an OSI200 actuator were implanted into a human cadaver head in the audiologically most favourable position according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Scanning was accomplished using the institutional <i>head and inner ear</i> protocol with a General Electric 1.5 Tesla scanner with retained and removed implant magnet, extended with T1 and T2 weighted sequences with metal-artefact reduction (MAVRIC SL). Image quality was evaluated by three radiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Osia®2 produced significant artefacts in most of the series of standard imaging sequences predominantly on the ipsilateral side of the head. The majority of the artefacts were caused by the implant magnet. Even without removing the magnet, MAVRIC SL improved image quality to such an extent that it became comparable with that after magnet removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The standard sequences suffer considerable quality loss due to the artefacts, attributed predominantly to the magnetic component. Metal-artefact reduction sequences are effective in obtaining sufficient-to-good quality images without surgical magnet removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artefacts on magnetic resonance imaging with Osia®2 bone conduction hearing aid: A cadaver study.\",\"authors\":\"Beata Diosi, Zsofia Bere, Angela Csomor, Tamara Tapai, Zoltan Toth, Edina Kovacs, Balint Posta, Miklos Csanady, Antal Nogradi, Zsigmond Tamas Kincses, Laszlo Rovo, Adam Perenyi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14670100.2024.2398833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hearing implants often limit the assessment of magnetic resonance examinations due to susceptibility artefacts. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of artefacts attributed to the Osia®2 implant system in terms of utility in visualizing selected cranial structures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A BI300 implant and an OSI200 actuator were implanted into a human cadaver head in the audiologically most favourable position according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Scanning was accomplished using the institutional <i>head and inner ear</i> protocol with a General Electric 1.5 Tesla scanner with retained and removed implant magnet, extended with T1 and T2 weighted sequences with metal-artefact reduction (MAVRIC SL). Image quality was evaluated by three radiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Osia®2 produced significant artefacts in most of the series of standard imaging sequences predominantly on the ipsilateral side of the head. The majority of the artefacts were caused by the implant magnet. Even without removing the magnet, MAVRIC SL improved image quality to such an extent that it became comparable with that after magnet removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The standard sequences suffer considerable quality loss due to the artefacts, attributed predominantly to the magnetic component. Metal-artefact reduction sequences are effective in obtaining sufficient-to-good quality images without surgical magnet removal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2024.2398833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2024.2398833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于易感伪影的存在,听力植入物通常会限制磁共振检查的评估。我们的目的是评估 Osia®2 植入系统产生的伪影对选定颅骨结构可视化的影响:方法:根据制造商的指导原则,将 BI300 植入体和 OSI200 驱动器植入人体尸体头部听力学最有利的位置。扫描采用通用电气公司的 1.5 特斯拉扫描仪进行,扫描仪带有保留和移除植入体的磁铁,并扩展了 T1 和 T2 加权序列,同时减少了金属失真(MAVRIC SL)。三位放射科医生对图像质量进行了评估:结果:在大多数标准成像序列中,Osia®2 都产生了明显的伪影,主要集中在头部同侧。大部分伪影是由植入磁铁造成的。即使不移除磁铁,MAVRIC SL 也能改善图像质量,使其与移除磁铁后的图像质量相当:结论:标准序列由于主要由磁性成分造成的伪影而导致相当大的质量损失。减少金属伪影的序列能在不进行磁铁移除手术的情况下有效获得质量足够好的图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artefacts on magnetic resonance imaging with Osia®2 bone conduction hearing aid: A cadaver study.

Objectives: Hearing implants often limit the assessment of magnetic resonance examinations due to susceptibility artefacts. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of artefacts attributed to the Osia®2 implant system in terms of utility in visualizing selected cranial structures.

Methods: A BI300 implant and an OSI200 actuator were implanted into a human cadaver head in the audiologically most favourable position according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Scanning was accomplished using the institutional head and inner ear protocol with a General Electric 1.5 Tesla scanner with retained and removed implant magnet, extended with T1 and T2 weighted sequences with metal-artefact reduction (MAVRIC SL). Image quality was evaluated by three radiologists.

Results: The Osia®2 produced significant artefacts in most of the series of standard imaging sequences predominantly on the ipsilateral side of the head. The majority of the artefacts were caused by the implant magnet. Even without removing the magnet, MAVRIC SL improved image quality to such an extent that it became comparable with that after magnet removal.

Conclusions: The standard sequences suffer considerable quality loss due to the artefacts, attributed predominantly to the magnetic component. Metal-artefact reduction sequences are effective in obtaining sufficient-to-good quality images without surgical magnet removal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信