评估 COVID-19 大流行期间机械人工心脏瓣膜患者的维生素 K 拮抗剂管理和控制情况。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Israel Medical Association Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01
Ilana Gilboa, Keren Rodrig, Tzipi Hornik-Lurie, David Pereg
{"title":"评估 COVID-19 大流行期间机械人工心脏瓣膜患者的维生素 K 拮抗剂管理和控制情况。","authors":"Ilana Gilboa, Keren Rodrig, Tzipi Hornik-Lurie, David Pereg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves must be treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) due to an increased risk of valve thrombosis and systemic embolism.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on VKA treatment control in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective nationwide cohort study using the Clalit Health Services database. The cohort included patients who underwent either aortic or mitral valve replacement using a prosthetic mechanical valve. The primary outcomes included the overall time in therapeutic range (TTR) and the percent of patients with a TTR < 50% during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to preceding year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 2381 patients. The percentage of patients who had at least two international normalized ratio (INR) tests during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly lower compared to the year preceding the pandemic (81% and 87%, respectively, P < 0.001). In both years, the percentage of patients without any documented INR test was high (31.5% in the first COVID-19 pandemic year and 28.9% in the preceding year, P < 0.001). TTR was significantly lower during the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the preceding year (68.1% ± 26 and 69.4% ± 24, P = 0.03). A TTR > 50% was demonstrated in 78% and 81% during the pandemic and the preceding year, P = 0.009.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We noted overall poor VKA control in patients with mechanical heart valves. During the COVID-19 pandemic, VKA control became even worse as reflected by significantly lower TTR and INR tests rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":50268,"journal":{"name":"Israel Medical Association Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Vitamin K Antagonists Management and Control in Patients with Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valves during the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Ilana Gilboa, Keren Rodrig, Tzipi Hornik-Lurie, David Pereg\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves must be treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) due to an increased risk of valve thrombosis and systemic embolism.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on VKA treatment control in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective nationwide cohort study using the Clalit Health Services database. The cohort included patients who underwent either aortic or mitral valve replacement using a prosthetic mechanical valve. The primary outcomes included the overall time in therapeutic range (TTR) and the percent of patients with a TTR < 50% during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to preceding year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 2381 patients. The percentage of patients who had at least two international normalized ratio (INR) tests during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly lower compared to the year preceding the pandemic (81% and 87%, respectively, P < 0.001). In both years, the percentage of patients without any documented INR test was high (31.5% in the first COVID-19 pandemic year and 28.9% in the preceding year, P < 0.001). TTR was significantly lower during the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the preceding year (68.1% ± 26 and 69.4% ± 24, P = 0.03). A TTR > 50% was demonstrated in 78% and 81% during the pandemic and the preceding year, P = 0.009.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We noted overall poor VKA control in patients with mechanical heart valves. During the COVID-19 pandemic, VKA control became even worse as reflected by significantly lower TTR and INR tests rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Israel Medical Association Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Israel Medical Association Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Medical Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于瓣膜血栓形成和全身性栓塞的风险增加,机械性人工心脏瓣膜患者必须使用维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)治疗:评估 COVID-19 大流行对机械人工心脏瓣膜患者 VKA 治疗控制的影响:我们利用 Clalit 健康服务数据库开展了一项全国性回顾性队列研究。研究对象包括使用人工机械瓣膜接受主动脉瓣或二尖瓣置换术的患者。主要结果包括治疗范围内的总时间(TTR)和 COVID-19 大流行第一年与前一年相比 TTR < 50% 的患者百分比:结果:队列中有 2381 名患者。在COVID-19大流行的第一年,至少进行过两次国际标准化比值(INR)检测的患者比例明显低于大流行前一年(分别为81%和87%,P<0.001)。在这两年中,没有任何 INR 检测记录的患者比例都很高(COVID-19 大流行第一年为 31.5%,前一年为 28.9%,P<0.001)。与前一年相比,COVID-19 大流行第一年的 TTR 明显降低(68.1% ± 26 和 69.4% ± 24,P = 0.03)。大流行期间和前一年分别有 78% 和 81% 的患者 TTR >50%,P = 0.009:我们注意到,机械心脏瓣膜患者的 VKA 控制率总体较低。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,VKA 控制更差,这反映在 TTR 和 INR 检测率显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Vitamin K Antagonists Management and Control in Patients with Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valves during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: Patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves must be treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) due to an increased risk of valve thrombosis and systemic embolism.

Objectives: To assess the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on VKA treatment control in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective nationwide cohort study using the Clalit Health Services database. The cohort included patients who underwent either aortic or mitral valve replacement using a prosthetic mechanical valve. The primary outcomes included the overall time in therapeutic range (TTR) and the percent of patients with a TTR < 50% during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to preceding year.

Results: The cohort included 2381 patients. The percentage of patients who had at least two international normalized ratio (INR) tests during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly lower compared to the year preceding the pandemic (81% and 87%, respectively, P < 0.001). In both years, the percentage of patients without any documented INR test was high (31.5% in the first COVID-19 pandemic year and 28.9% in the preceding year, P < 0.001). TTR was significantly lower during the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the preceding year (68.1% ± 26 and 69.4% ± 24, P = 0.03). A TTR > 50% was demonstrated in 78% and 81% during the pandemic and the preceding year, P = 0.009.

Conclusions: We noted overall poor VKA control in patients with mechanical heart valves. During the COVID-19 pandemic, VKA control became even worse as reflected by significantly lower TTR and INR tests rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Israel Medical Association Journal
Israel Medical Association Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ), representing medical sciences and medicine in Israel, is published in English by the Israel Medical Association. The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ) was initiated in 1999.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信