中国吞咽困难服务实践调查。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Yi Li, Qiongshuai Zhang, Jing Zeng, Liugen Wang
{"title":"中国吞咽困难服务实践调查。","authors":"Yi Li,&nbsp;Qiongshuai Zhang,&nbsp;Jing Zeng,&nbsp;Liugen Wang","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.13127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Dysphagia services have only recently been formalised within Chinese health services. There has been no comprehensive evaluation of all aspects of dysphagia services practice in China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To provide a profile for the dysphagia practice in China by assessing various facets of dysphagia services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Procedures</h3>\n \n <p>This is a survey study carried out from December 2022 to May 2023 online in China. One hundred fifty-nine respondents comprising doctors, nurses or therapists involved in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation completed a questionnaire via Sojump. The questionnaire included dichotomous (e.g., yes/no) and multiple-choice questions related to participants' general information and their provision of dysphagia management services. Results were analysed descriptively and the differences among different levels of hospitals were analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Outcomes and Results</h3>\n \n <p>Approximately two-thirds of hospitals (67.9%) started dysphagia services within the last 5 years. A significant difference in the initiation of dysphagia rehabilitation was observed across different hospital levels (<i>χ</i><sup>2 </sup> = 32.70;<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Routine dysphagia screening was a standard practice in most hospitals (71.7%), with the most frequently employed screening method being the water swallow test (95.6%). Clinical swallowing evaluation emerged as the preferred initial assessment method (80.5%) and the most utilised assessment method (91.8%). Video fluoroscopic swallow study and flexible endoscopic evaluation swallowing were used by 22.7% and 12.6% of respondents. A significant difference was observed in the choice of assessment methods across hospitals of different levels (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 43.397; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The majority of respondents (53.5%) primarily employed rehabilitation as the main intervention method (76%–100%). Most respondents indicated that they would reevaluate patients after treatment (74.8%) and reported routine follow-up with patients (60.4%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions and Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the relatively recent development of dysphagia management in China, the practice patterns uncovered in this study are broadly consistent with Chinese guidelines and consensus. However, the use of instrumental assessments remains low, resulting in a lack of objective evaluation of patient conditions and outcomes. There is a need for policy and resource support in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation in China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What is already known on this subject</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Assessment and treatment methods for dysphagia are various across different patients, medical facilities and settings. There has been no comprehensive evaluation of all aspects of dysphagia rehabilitation practice in China.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What this study adds to existing knowledge</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The study assessed various facets of dysphagia rehabilitation in China through an online survey. We found that the relatively recent development of dysphagia management in China, but the practice patterns uncovered in this study are broadly consistent with Chinese guidelines and consensus. Variations in practice patterns between hospitals of different levels may be attributed to resource constraints and patient needs. Besides, while rehabilitation exercises are the primary intervention method for dysphagia in China, the assessment largely centres on clinical swallowing evaluation. The use of instrumental assessments remains low, resulting in a lack of objective evaluation of patient conditions and outcomes.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What are the clinical implications of this work?</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The study assessed various facets of dysphagia rehabilitation in China, and the results indicate that the use of instrumental assessments needs to be improved and there is a need for policy and resource support in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation in China.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"59 6","pages":"3004-3017"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of dysphagia services practice in China\",\"authors\":\"Yi Li,&nbsp;Qiongshuai Zhang,&nbsp;Jing Zeng,&nbsp;Liugen Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1460-6984.13127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dysphagia services have only recently been formalised within Chinese health services. There has been no comprehensive evaluation of all aspects of dysphagia services practice in China.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>To provide a profile for the dysphagia practice in China by assessing various facets of dysphagia services.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and Procedures</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is a survey study carried out from December 2022 to May 2023 online in China. One hundred fifty-nine respondents comprising doctors, nurses or therapists involved in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation completed a questionnaire via Sojump. The questionnaire included dichotomous (e.g., yes/no) and multiple-choice questions related to participants' general information and their provision of dysphagia management services. Results were analysed descriptively and the differences among different levels of hospitals were analysed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Outcomes and Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Approximately two-thirds of hospitals (67.9%) started dysphagia services within the last 5 years. A significant difference in the initiation of dysphagia rehabilitation was observed across different hospital levels (<i>χ</i><sup>2 </sup> = 32.70;<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Routine dysphagia screening was a standard practice in most hospitals (71.7%), with the most frequently employed screening method being the water swallow test (95.6%). Clinical swallowing evaluation emerged as the preferred initial assessment method (80.5%) and the most utilised assessment method (91.8%). Video fluoroscopic swallow study and flexible endoscopic evaluation swallowing were used by 22.7% and 12.6% of respondents. A significant difference was observed in the choice of assessment methods across hospitals of different levels (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 43.397; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The majority of respondents (53.5%) primarily employed rehabilitation as the main intervention method (76%–100%). Most respondents indicated that they would reevaluate patients after treatment (74.8%) and reported routine follow-up with patients (60.4%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions and Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite the relatively recent development of dysphagia management in China, the practice patterns uncovered in this study are broadly consistent with Chinese guidelines and consensus. However, the use of instrumental assessments remains low, resulting in a lack of objective evaluation of patient conditions and outcomes. There is a need for policy and resource support in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation in China.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> What is already known on this subject</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Assessment and treatment methods for dysphagia are various across different patients, medical facilities and settings. There has been no comprehensive evaluation of all aspects of dysphagia rehabilitation practice in China.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> What this study adds to existing knowledge</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>The study assessed various facets of dysphagia rehabilitation in China through an online survey. We found that the relatively recent development of dysphagia management in China, but the practice patterns uncovered in this study are broadly consistent with Chinese guidelines and consensus. Variations in practice patterns between hospitals of different levels may be attributed to resource constraints and patient needs. Besides, while rehabilitation exercises are the primary intervention method for dysphagia in China, the assessment largely centres on clinical swallowing evaluation. The use of instrumental assessments remains low, resulting in a lack of objective evaluation of patient conditions and outcomes.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> What are the clinical implications of this work?</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>The study assessed various facets of dysphagia rehabilitation in China, and the results indicate that the use of instrumental assessments needs to be improved and there is a need for policy and resource support in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation in China.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders\",\"volume\":\"59 6\",\"pages\":\"3004-3017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.13127\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.13127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:吞咽困难服务最近才在中国的医疗服务机构中正式开展起来。目的:通过评估吞咽困难服务的各个方面,为中国的吞咽困难服务提供一个概况:这是一项于2022年12月至2023年5月在中国进行的在线调查研究。159名受访者包括吞咽困难康复领域的医生、护士或治疗师,他们通过Sojump完成了一份调查问卷。问卷包括二分法(如 "是/否")和多项选择题,内容涉及参与者的一般信息及其提供的吞咽困难管理服务。调查结果采用描述性分析,并分析了不同级别医院之间的差异:约三分之二的医院(67.9%)在过去 5 年内开始提供吞咽困难治疗服务。不同级别医院在开始吞咽困难康复治疗方面存在明显差异(χ2 = 32.70;p 2 = 43.397; p < 0.001)。大多数受访者(53.5%)主要采用康复治疗作为主要干预方法(76%-100%)。大多数受访者表示会在治疗后对患者进行重新评估(74.8%),并对患者进行常规随访(60.4%):尽管中国的吞咽困难管理发展相对较晚,但本研究发现的实践模式与中国的指南和共识基本一致。然而,工具性评估的使用率仍然很低,导致缺乏对患者病情和结果的客观评估。中国在吞咽困难康复领域需要政策和资源支持:对这一问题的认识 吞咽困难的评估和治疗方法因患者、医疗机构和环境的不同而各异。目前尚未对中国吞咽困难康复实践的各个方面进行全面评估。本研究对现有知识的补充 本研究通过在线调查对中国吞咽困难康复的各个方面进行了评估。我们发现,中国吞咽困难管理的发展相对较晚,但本研究发现的实践模式与中国的指南和共识基本一致。不同级别医院在实践模式上的差异可能与资源限制和患者需求有关。此外,虽然康复训练是中国吞咽困难的主要干预方法,但评估主要集中于临床吞咽评估。工具性评估的使用率仍然较低,导致缺乏对患者病情和结果的客观评价。这项工作的临床意义是什么?本研究对中国吞咽困难康复的各个方面进行了评估,结果表明,中国在吞咽困难康复领域需要提高工具评估的使用率,并需要政策和资源支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey of dysphagia services practice in China

Background

Dysphagia services have only recently been formalised within Chinese health services. There has been no comprehensive evaluation of all aspects of dysphagia services practice in China.

Aims

To provide a profile for the dysphagia practice in China by assessing various facets of dysphagia services.

Methods and Procedures

This is a survey study carried out from December 2022 to May 2023 online in China. One hundred fifty-nine respondents comprising doctors, nurses or therapists involved in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation completed a questionnaire via Sojump. The questionnaire included dichotomous (e.g., yes/no) and multiple-choice questions related to participants' general information and their provision of dysphagia management services. Results were analysed descriptively and the differences among different levels of hospitals were analysed.

Outcomes and Results

Approximately two-thirds of hospitals (67.9%) started dysphagia services within the last 5 years. A significant difference in the initiation of dysphagia rehabilitation was observed across different hospital levels (χ = 32.70;p < 0.001). Routine dysphagia screening was a standard practice in most hospitals (71.7%), with the most frequently employed screening method being the water swallow test (95.6%). Clinical swallowing evaluation emerged as the preferred initial assessment method (80.5%) and the most utilised assessment method (91.8%). Video fluoroscopic swallow study and flexible endoscopic evaluation swallowing were used by 22.7% and 12.6% of respondents. A significant difference was observed in the choice of assessment methods across hospitals of different levels (χ2 = 43.397; p < 0.001). The majority of respondents (53.5%) primarily employed rehabilitation as the main intervention method (76%–100%). Most respondents indicated that they would reevaluate patients after treatment (74.8%) and reported routine follow-up with patients (60.4%).

Conclusions and Implications

Despite the relatively recent development of dysphagia management in China, the practice patterns uncovered in this study are broadly consistent with Chinese guidelines and consensus. However, the use of instrumental assessments remains low, resulting in a lack of objective evaluation of patient conditions and outcomes. There is a need for policy and resource support in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation in China.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on this subject

  • Assessment and treatment methods for dysphagia are various across different patients, medical facilities and settings. There has been no comprehensive evaluation of all aspects of dysphagia rehabilitation practice in China.

What this study adds to existing knowledge

  • The study assessed various facets of dysphagia rehabilitation in China through an online survey. We found that the relatively recent development of dysphagia management in China, but the practice patterns uncovered in this study are broadly consistent with Chinese guidelines and consensus. Variations in practice patterns between hospitals of different levels may be attributed to resource constraints and patient needs. Besides, while rehabilitation exercises are the primary intervention method for dysphagia in China, the assessment largely centres on clinical swallowing evaluation. The use of instrumental assessments remains low, resulting in a lack of objective evaluation of patient conditions and outcomes.

What are the clinical implications of this work?

  • The study assessed various facets of dysphagia rehabilitation in China, and the results indicate that the use of instrumental assessments needs to be improved and there is a need for policy and resource support in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation in China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信