Peby Maulina Lestari, Dindadikusuma Dindadikusuma, Ratih Krisna, Theodorus Theodorus, Abarham Martadiansyah, Nuswil Bernolian, Putri Mirani, Muhammad Al Farisi Sutrisno, Bella Stevanny
{"title":"预测阴道分娩成功率:产前经会阴超声下降角度在单个中心的作用。","authors":"Peby Maulina Lestari, Dindadikusuma Dindadikusuma, Ratih Krisna, Theodorus Theodorus, Abarham Martadiansyah, Nuswil Bernolian, Putri Mirani, Muhammad Al Farisi Sutrisno, Bella Stevanny","doi":"10.12659/MSM.945458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Assessment of labor progress via digital vaginal examination is subjective, while intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography is deemed more objective and effective. The angle of descent (AoD) is a reliable intrapartum transperineal ultrasound parameter with minimal inter-observer and intra-observer errors. This study compared intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography with digital vaginal examination in evaluating the angle of descent for vaginal delivery selection in 70 women. MATERIAL AND METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Hospital Palembang in Indonesia, using a consecutive sampling method to measure AoD of 70 patients at admission and every 2 h during labor progression. Patients were monitored until childbirth, and outcomes of successful vaginal or cesarean delivery were reported. A diagnostic test determined the optimal AoD for predicting successful vaginal delivery and its predictive value. RESULTS The study included 70 patients with a mean age of 28.29±6.09 years and a body mass index of 30.59±3.49 kg/m². Among them, 29 (41%) had successful vaginal deliveries. Adequate contraction frequency at admission was strongly associated with successful vaginal delivery (P<0.001). The optimal AoD for predicting successful vaginal delivery was 94.5°, with an area under the curve of 0.567 (95% CI 0.425-0.710), sensitivity of 84.2%, specificity of 45.7%, and accuracy of 54.3%. CONCLUSIONS Intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography for measuring AoD can be a valuable adjunct in labor management. Further investigations are needed to validate the optimal AoD in Indonesian pregnant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"30 ","pages":"e945458"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Vaginal Delivery Success: Role of Intrapartum Transperineal Ultrasound Angle of Descent at a Single Center.\",\"authors\":\"Peby Maulina Lestari, Dindadikusuma Dindadikusuma, Ratih Krisna, Theodorus Theodorus, Abarham Martadiansyah, Nuswil Bernolian, Putri Mirani, Muhammad Al Farisi Sutrisno, Bella Stevanny\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/MSM.945458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND Assessment of labor progress via digital vaginal examination is subjective, while intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography is deemed more objective and effective. The angle of descent (AoD) is a reliable intrapartum transperineal ultrasound parameter with minimal inter-observer and intra-observer errors. This study compared intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography with digital vaginal examination in evaluating the angle of descent for vaginal delivery selection in 70 women. MATERIAL AND METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Hospital Palembang in Indonesia, using a consecutive sampling method to measure AoD of 70 patients at admission and every 2 h during labor progression. Patients were monitored until childbirth, and outcomes of successful vaginal or cesarean delivery were reported. A diagnostic test determined the optimal AoD for predicting successful vaginal delivery and its predictive value. RESULTS The study included 70 patients with a mean age of 28.29±6.09 years and a body mass index of 30.59±3.49 kg/m². Among them, 29 (41%) had successful vaginal deliveries. Adequate contraction frequency at admission was strongly associated with successful vaginal delivery (P<0.001). The optimal AoD for predicting successful vaginal delivery was 94.5°, with an area under the curve of 0.567 (95% CI 0.425-0.710), sensitivity of 84.2%, specificity of 45.7%, and accuracy of 54.3%. CONCLUSIONS Intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography for measuring AoD can be a valuable adjunct in labor management. Further investigations are needed to validate the optimal AoD in Indonesian pregnant women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"e945458\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476033/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.945458\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.945458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting Vaginal Delivery Success: Role of Intrapartum Transperineal Ultrasound Angle of Descent at a Single Center.
BACKGROUND Assessment of labor progress via digital vaginal examination is subjective, while intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography is deemed more objective and effective. The angle of descent (AoD) is a reliable intrapartum transperineal ultrasound parameter with minimal inter-observer and intra-observer errors. This study compared intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography with digital vaginal examination in evaluating the angle of descent for vaginal delivery selection in 70 women. MATERIAL AND METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Hospital Palembang in Indonesia, using a consecutive sampling method to measure AoD of 70 patients at admission and every 2 h during labor progression. Patients were monitored until childbirth, and outcomes of successful vaginal or cesarean delivery were reported. A diagnostic test determined the optimal AoD for predicting successful vaginal delivery and its predictive value. RESULTS The study included 70 patients with a mean age of 28.29±6.09 years and a body mass index of 30.59±3.49 kg/m². Among them, 29 (41%) had successful vaginal deliveries. Adequate contraction frequency at admission was strongly associated with successful vaginal delivery (P<0.001). The optimal AoD for predicting successful vaginal delivery was 94.5°, with an area under the curve of 0.567 (95% CI 0.425-0.710), sensitivity of 84.2%, specificity of 45.7%, and accuracy of 54.3%. CONCLUSIONS Intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography for measuring AoD can be a valuable adjunct in labor management. Further investigations are needed to validate the optimal AoD in Indonesian pregnant women.
期刊介绍:
Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper.
Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.