测量胰石蛋白与 C 反应蛋白和降钙素原在重症监护病房脓毒症诊断中的比较:系统综述。

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI:10.21315/mjms2024.31.5.3
Septian Adi Permana, Purwoko, Enrico Jonathan Hartono
{"title":"测量胰石蛋白与 C 反应蛋白和降钙素原在重症监护病房脓毒症诊断中的比较:系统综述。","authors":"Septian Adi Permana, Purwoko, Enrico Jonathan Hartono","doi":"10.21315/mjms2024.31.5.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sepsis remains a significant challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU), with prompt diagnosis and management being critical to improving patient outcomes. Biomarkers have emerged as valuable tools for identifying and predicting sepsis outcomes, with pancreatic stone protein (PSP), procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as three promising candidates. This systematic review aimed to analyse and compare the diagnostic accuracy of PSP, PCT and CRP regarding sepsis in the ICU. A review of the literature on the diagnostic performance of the three biomarkers was performed using PubMed Central, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Oxford Academic, SpringerLink and Cochrane Library. Data regarding the diagnostic accuracy of the three biomarkers were extracted, compared, and represented as the area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Three studies examining PSP, PCT and CRP biomarkers in 858 adult patients admitted to the ICU were included in this review. Compared with PCT and CRP, the PSP biomarker, with its unique applications and properties that may potentially benefit patients, doctors and hospitals, performed well and proved reliable in diagnosing sepsis in adult patients. PSP demonstrated reliability in sepsis diagnosis. Further analysis should be conducted to establish a formal, appropriate indication, as well as to determine a suspected sepsis patient's condition when testing each biomarker.</p>","PeriodicalId":47388,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"31 5","pages":"32-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11477456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of Pancreatic Stone Protein Compared with C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin in the Diagnosis of Sepsis in an Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Septian Adi Permana, Purwoko, Enrico Jonathan Hartono\",\"doi\":\"10.21315/mjms2024.31.5.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sepsis remains a significant challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU), with prompt diagnosis and management being critical to improving patient outcomes. Biomarkers have emerged as valuable tools for identifying and predicting sepsis outcomes, with pancreatic stone protein (PSP), procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as three promising candidates. This systematic review aimed to analyse and compare the diagnostic accuracy of PSP, PCT and CRP regarding sepsis in the ICU. A review of the literature on the diagnostic performance of the three biomarkers was performed using PubMed Central, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Oxford Academic, SpringerLink and Cochrane Library. Data regarding the diagnostic accuracy of the three biomarkers were extracted, compared, and represented as the area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Three studies examining PSP, PCT and CRP biomarkers in 858 adult patients admitted to the ICU were included in this review. Compared with PCT and CRP, the PSP biomarker, with its unique applications and properties that may potentially benefit patients, doctors and hospitals, performed well and proved reliable in diagnosing sepsis in adult patients. PSP demonstrated reliability in sepsis diagnosis. Further analysis should be conducted to establish a formal, appropriate indication, as well as to determine a suspected sepsis patient's condition when testing each biomarker.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"32-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11477456/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2024.31.5.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2024.31.5.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脓毒症仍然是重症监护室(ICU)面临的一项重大挑战,及时诊断和管理是改善患者预后的关键。生物标志物已成为识别和预测脓毒症结果的重要工具,其中胰石蛋白(PSP)、降钙素原(PCT)和C反应蛋白(CRP)是三种很有前途的候选指标。本系统综述旨在分析和比较 PSP、PCT 和 CRP 对 ICU 败血症的诊断准确性。我们利用 PubMed Central、PubMed、ScienceDirect、Oxford Academic、SpringerLink 和 Cochrane Library 对有关这三种生物标记物诊断性能的文献进行了综述。提取、比较了三种生物标记物的诊断准确性数据,并以曲线下面积(AUC)接收器操作特征(ROC)表示。本综述纳入了三项研究,分别对 858 名入住重症监护室的成人患者的 PSP、PCT 和 CRP 生物标志物进行了检测。与 PCT 和 CRP 相比,PSP 生物标记物具有独特的应用和特性,可为患者、医生和医院带来潜在的益处,在诊断成年患者败血症方面表现良好且可靠。PSP 在败血症诊断中表现可靠。在检测每种生物标记物时,应进行进一步分析,以确定正式、适当的适应症,并确定疑似败血症患者的病情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement of Pancreatic Stone Protein Compared with C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin in the Diagnosis of Sepsis in an Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.

Sepsis remains a significant challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU), with prompt diagnosis and management being critical to improving patient outcomes. Biomarkers have emerged as valuable tools for identifying and predicting sepsis outcomes, with pancreatic stone protein (PSP), procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as three promising candidates. This systematic review aimed to analyse and compare the diagnostic accuracy of PSP, PCT and CRP regarding sepsis in the ICU. A review of the literature on the diagnostic performance of the three biomarkers was performed using PubMed Central, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Oxford Academic, SpringerLink and Cochrane Library. Data regarding the diagnostic accuracy of the three biomarkers were extracted, compared, and represented as the area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Three studies examining PSP, PCT and CRP biomarkers in 858 adult patients admitted to the ICU were included in this review. Compared with PCT and CRP, the PSP biomarker, with its unique applications and properties that may potentially benefit patients, doctors and hospitals, performed well and proved reliable in diagnosing sepsis in adult patients. PSP demonstrated reliability in sepsis diagnosis. Further analysis should be conducted to establish a formal, appropriate indication, as well as to determine a suspected sepsis patient's condition when testing each biomarker.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences (MJMS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access, fully online journal that is published at least six times a year. The journal’s scope encompasses all aspects of medical sciences including biomedical, allied health, clinical and social sciences. We accept high quality papers from basic to translational research especially from low & middle income countries, as classified by the United Nations & World Bank (https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/ articles/906519), with the aim that published research will benefit back the bottom billion population from these countries. Manuscripts submitted from developed or high income countries to MJMS must contain data and information that will benefit the socio-health and bio-medical sciences of these low and middle income countries. The MJMS editorial board consists of internationally regarded clinicians and scientists from low and middle income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信