羊膜移植治疗化学和热眼表损伤的疗效:美国眼科学会报告。

IF 13.1 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Peter B Veldman, Mark A Greiner, Maria S Cortina, Anthony N Kuo, Jennifer Y Li, Darby D Miller, Roni M Shtein, Mitchell P Weikert, Jia Yin, Stephen J Kim, Joanne F Shen
{"title":"羊膜移植治疗化学和热眼表损伤的疗效:美国眼科学会报告。","authors":"Peter B Veldman, Mark A Greiner, Maria S Cortina, Anthony N Kuo, Jennifer Y Li, Darby D Miller, Roni M Shtein, Mitchell P Weikert, Jia Yin, Stephen J Kim, Joanne F Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.08.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the published literature on the efficacy of amniotic membrane grafting (AMG) in the management of acute chemical and thermal ocular surface burns with respect to the rate of corneal re-epithelialization and improvement of visual acuity or corneal clarity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature searches were conducted in the PubMed database in May 2023 and updated in January 2024 and were limited to the English language without date restrictions. The searches yielded 474 citations; 58 were reviewed in full text, and 9 met the inclusion criteria. Four studies were rated level II, and 5 studies were rated level III. This assessment focuses on 3 level II articles that provided consistent primary and secondary outcomes but demonstrated suboptimal study design with respect to power calculations and lacked a priori sample-size calculations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amniotic membrane grafting significantly improved corneal re-epithelialization compared with medical therapy alone in eyes with moderate-grade burns. For severely burned eyes, AMG demonstrated no advantage over medical therapy. Additionally, AMG demonstrated no significant advantage over medical therapy for improved visual acuity or corneal clarity for moderate or severe ocular surface burns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The best available level II evidence suggests that AMG in the setting of acute ocular surface burns has efficacy in hastening re-epithelialization in moderate burns. As an adjuvant to medical therapy, it did not demonstrate a benefit in improving re-epithelialization in severe burns or visual acuity or corneal clarity in either moderate or severe burns.</p><p><strong>Financial disclosure(s): </strong>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.</p>","PeriodicalId":19533,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Amniotic Membrane Grafting for the Treatment of Chemical and Thermal Ocular Surface Injuries: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.\",\"authors\":\"Peter B Veldman, Mark A Greiner, Maria S Cortina, Anthony N Kuo, Jennifer Y Li, Darby D Miller, Roni M Shtein, Mitchell P Weikert, Jia Yin, Stephen J Kim, Joanne F Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.08.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the published literature on the efficacy of amniotic membrane grafting (AMG) in the management of acute chemical and thermal ocular surface burns with respect to the rate of corneal re-epithelialization and improvement of visual acuity or corneal clarity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature searches were conducted in the PubMed database in May 2023 and updated in January 2024 and were limited to the English language without date restrictions. The searches yielded 474 citations; 58 were reviewed in full text, and 9 met the inclusion criteria. Four studies were rated level II, and 5 studies were rated level III. This assessment focuses on 3 level II articles that provided consistent primary and secondary outcomes but demonstrated suboptimal study design with respect to power calculations and lacked a priori sample-size calculations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amniotic membrane grafting significantly improved corneal re-epithelialization compared with medical therapy alone in eyes with moderate-grade burns. For severely burned eyes, AMG demonstrated no advantage over medical therapy. Additionally, AMG demonstrated no significant advantage over medical therapy for improved visual acuity or corneal clarity for moderate or severe ocular surface burns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The best available level II evidence suggests that AMG in the setting of acute ocular surface burns has efficacy in hastening re-epithelialization in moderate burns. As an adjuvant to medical therapy, it did not demonstrate a benefit in improving re-epithelialization in severe burns or visual acuity or corneal clarity in either moderate or severe burns.</p><p><strong>Financial disclosure(s): </strong>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.08.021\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.08.021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估已发表的有关羊膜移植术(AMG)治疗急性化学性和热性眼表烧伤在角膜再上皮化率和改善视力或角膜清晰度方面疗效的文献:于 2023 年 5 月在 PubMed 数据库中进行了文献检索,并于 2024 年 1 月进行了更新,检索仅限于英语,无日期限制。搜索共获得 474 篇引文,其中 58 篇进行了全文审阅,9 篇符合纳入标准。4 项研究被评为 II 级,5 项研究被评为 III 级。本次评估主要针对 3 篇二级文章,这些文章提供了一致的主要和次要结果,但在功率计算方面显示出研究设计不够理想,并且缺乏先验样本量计算:结果:与单纯药物治疗相比,羊膜移植能显著改善中度烧伤眼的角膜再上皮化。对于严重烧伤的眼睛,AMG 与药物治疗相比没有优势。此外,对于中度或重度眼表烧伤,AMG 在改善视力或角膜清晰度方面与药物疗法相比没有明显优势:现有的最佳二级证据表明,在急性眼表烧伤的情况下,AMG 对加速中度烧伤的再上皮化有一定疗效。作为药物治疗的辅助疗法,AMG 在改善重度烧伤的再上皮化、中度或重度烧伤的视力或角膜清晰度方面并未显示出其益处:专利或商业信息披露请参见参考文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Amniotic Membrane Grafting for the Treatment of Chemical and Thermal Ocular Surface Injuries: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Objective: To evaluate the published literature on the efficacy of amniotic membrane grafting (AMG) in the management of acute chemical and thermal ocular surface burns with respect to the rate of corneal re-epithelialization and improvement of visual acuity or corneal clarity.

Methods: Literature searches were conducted in the PubMed database in May 2023 and updated in January 2024 and were limited to the English language without date restrictions. The searches yielded 474 citations; 58 were reviewed in full text, and 9 met the inclusion criteria. Four studies were rated level II, and 5 studies were rated level III. This assessment focuses on 3 level II articles that provided consistent primary and secondary outcomes but demonstrated suboptimal study design with respect to power calculations and lacked a priori sample-size calculations.

Results: Amniotic membrane grafting significantly improved corneal re-epithelialization compared with medical therapy alone in eyes with moderate-grade burns. For severely burned eyes, AMG demonstrated no advantage over medical therapy. Additionally, AMG demonstrated no significant advantage over medical therapy for improved visual acuity or corneal clarity for moderate or severe ocular surface burns.

Conclusions: The best available level II evidence suggests that AMG in the setting of acute ocular surface burns has efficacy in hastening re-epithelialization in moderate burns. As an adjuvant to medical therapy, it did not demonstrate a benefit in improving re-epithelialization in severe burns or visual acuity or corneal clarity in either moderate or severe burns.

Financial disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ophthalmology, from the American Academy of Ophthalmology, contributes to society by publishing research in clinical and basic science related to vision.It upholds excellence through unbiased peer-review, fostering innovation, promoting discovery, and encouraging lifelong learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信