心力衰竭指南指导下的药物治疗诊所的疗效、安全性和机制影响。

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Aferdita Spahillari, Laura P Cohen, Claire Lin, Yuxi Liu, Ashley Tringale, Kathryn E Sheppard, Christine Ko, Rahul Khairnar, Kristin M Williamson, Jason H Wasfy, Nandita S Scott, Charlotte Paquette, Stephen J Greene, Gregg C Fonarow, James L Januzzi
{"title":"心力衰竭指南指导下的药物治疗诊所的疗效、安全性和机制影响。","authors":"Aferdita Spahillari, Laura P Cohen, Claire Lin, Yuxi Liu, Ashley Tringale, Kathryn E Sheppard, Christine Ko, Rahul Khairnar, Kristin M Williamson, Jason H Wasfy, Nandita S Scott, Charlotte Paquette, Stephen J Greene, Gregg C Fonarow, James L Januzzi","doi":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although clinical evidence supports rapid institution of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF), in actual practice, there remain large gaps in adherence to guideline recommendations. Recent data support safety and efficacy of rapid GDMT implementation; however, rapid GDMT deployment within a general cardiology environment remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a GDMT clinic within a general cardiology practice relative to usual care, the impact on prescription of GDMT, HF symptoms, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations and echocardiographic parameters of remodeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with HF with an abnormal ejection fraction (<50%) referred to the GDMT clinic underwent rapid GDMT titration with close monitoring of clinical data. Rates of GDMT prescription were compared with a matched reference group. Patients underwent echocardiography at baseline and after GDMT clinic completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 persons were treated in GDMT clinic. The mean age was 67.6 ± 14.6 years, and 32 (28%) were women. Among those referred, 100 (87.7%) had no contraindications for 4-drug GDMT. From baseline to clinic completion (median 15.8 weeks [Q1-Q3: 10.7-23.0 weeks]), patients without medication contraindications experienced significant increases in 4-drug GDMT use (from 21% to 88%; P < 0.001); of 4-drug GDMT recipients, 92% received angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor. GDMT clinic participants achieved higher medication doses than those in usual care, with greater achievement of ≥50% target dose of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (52% vs 8%), beta-blocker (78% vs 6.2%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (98% vs 15.6%), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (92% vs 6.2%). Target doses of all 4 drugs were reached in nearly 1 in 4 participants. HF symptoms improved (94% to 75% NYHA functional class II/III; P < 0.001) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration decreased (median 587 to 534 ng/L; P = 0.03) despite loop diuretic reduction. Additionally, we observed an absolute 6% LVEF increase (from 37% [Q1-Q3: 31%-41%] to 43% [Q1-Q3: 38%-53%]; P < 0.001) and substantial decrease in moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. GDMT titration was well-tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rapid GDMT implementation via an outpatient GDMT clinic was effective, safe, and associated with improvement in key clinical parameters. The more widespread role of GDMT clinics to improve HF care warrants further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":14687,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Heart failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy, Safety and Mechanistic Impact of a Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Aferdita Spahillari, Laura P Cohen, Claire Lin, Yuxi Liu, Ashley Tringale, Kathryn E Sheppard, Christine Ko, Rahul Khairnar, Kristin M Williamson, Jason H Wasfy, Nandita S Scott, Charlotte Paquette, Stephen J Greene, Gregg C Fonarow, James L Januzzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.08.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although clinical evidence supports rapid institution of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF), in actual practice, there remain large gaps in adherence to guideline recommendations. Recent data support safety and efficacy of rapid GDMT implementation; however, rapid GDMT deployment within a general cardiology environment remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a GDMT clinic within a general cardiology practice relative to usual care, the impact on prescription of GDMT, HF symptoms, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations and echocardiographic parameters of remodeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with HF with an abnormal ejection fraction (<50%) referred to the GDMT clinic underwent rapid GDMT titration with close monitoring of clinical data. Rates of GDMT prescription were compared with a matched reference group. Patients underwent echocardiography at baseline and after GDMT clinic completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 persons were treated in GDMT clinic. The mean age was 67.6 ± 14.6 years, and 32 (28%) were women. Among those referred, 100 (87.7%) had no contraindications for 4-drug GDMT. From baseline to clinic completion (median 15.8 weeks [Q1-Q3: 10.7-23.0 weeks]), patients without medication contraindications experienced significant increases in 4-drug GDMT use (from 21% to 88%; P < 0.001); of 4-drug GDMT recipients, 92% received angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor. GDMT clinic participants achieved higher medication doses than those in usual care, with greater achievement of ≥50% target dose of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (52% vs 8%), beta-blocker (78% vs 6.2%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (98% vs 15.6%), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (92% vs 6.2%). Target doses of all 4 drugs were reached in nearly 1 in 4 participants. HF symptoms improved (94% to 75% NYHA functional class II/III; P < 0.001) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration decreased (median 587 to 534 ng/L; P = 0.03) despite loop diuretic reduction. Additionally, we observed an absolute 6% LVEF increase (from 37% [Q1-Q3: 31%-41%] to 43% [Q1-Q3: 38%-53%]; P < 0.001) and substantial decrease in moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. GDMT titration was well-tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rapid GDMT implementation via an outpatient GDMT clinic was effective, safe, and associated with improvement in key clinical parameters. The more widespread role of GDMT clinics to improve HF care warrants further study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JACC. Heart failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JACC. Heart failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2024.08.017\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Heart failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2024.08.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管临床证据支持对心力衰竭(HF)快速实施指南指导下的药物治疗(GDMT),但在实际操作中,指南建议的遵守情况仍存在很大差距。最近的数据支持快速实施 GDMT 的安全性和有效性;然而,在普通心脏病学环境中快速部署 GDMT 的问题仍未得到探讨:本研究的目的是评估在普通心脏病学实践中开设 GDMT 诊所相对于常规治疗的有效性和安全性,以及对 GDMT 处方、HF 症状、N-末端前 B 型钠尿肽浓度和重塑的超声心动图参数的影响:方法:射血分数异常的心房颤动患者(Results:共有114人在GDMT诊所接受了治疗。平均年龄为 67.6 ± 14.6 岁,女性 32 人(28%)。在转诊的患者中,100 人(87.7%)没有四药 GDMT 的禁忌症。从基线到门诊结束(中位数 15.8 周 [Q1-Q3: 10.7-23.0 周]),无药物禁忌症的患者使用 4 种药物 GDMT 的比例显著增加(从 21% 增加到 88%;P < 0.001);在接受 4 种药物 GDMT 的患者中,92% 接受了血管紧张素受体肾利酶抑制剂治疗。GDMT门诊参与者的用药剂量高于常规护理参与者,血管紧张素受体肾素酶抑制剂(52% vs 8%)、β-受体阻滞剂(78% vs 6.2%)、矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(98% vs 15.6%)和钠-葡萄糖共转运体2抑制剂(92% vs 6.2%)的目标剂量≥50%的比例更高。几乎每 4 名参与者中就有 1 人达到了所有 4 种药物的目标剂量。尽管襻利尿剂用量减少,但心房颤动症状有所改善(NYHA 功能分级 II/III 级的比例从 94% 降至 75%;P < 0.001),N-末端前 B 型利钠肽浓度下降(中位数从 587 降至 534 ng/L;P = 0.03)。此外,我们观察到 LVEF 绝对值增加了 6%(从 37% [Q1-Q3: 31%-41%] 增加到 43% [Q1-Q3: 38%-53%]; P < 0.001),中度或重度二尖瓣反流大幅减少。GDMT滴定的耐受性良好:结论:通过门诊 GDMT 诊所快速实施 GDMT 是有效、安全的,并能改善主要临床参数。GDMT 诊所在改善心房颤动护理方面的广泛作用值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy, Safety and Mechanistic Impact of a Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Clinic.

Background: Although clinical evidence supports rapid institution of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF), in actual practice, there remain large gaps in adherence to guideline recommendations. Recent data support safety and efficacy of rapid GDMT implementation; however, rapid GDMT deployment within a general cardiology environment remains unexplored.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a GDMT clinic within a general cardiology practice relative to usual care, the impact on prescription of GDMT, HF symptoms, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations and echocardiographic parameters of remodeling.

Methods: Individuals with HF with an abnormal ejection fraction (<50%) referred to the GDMT clinic underwent rapid GDMT titration with close monitoring of clinical data. Rates of GDMT prescription were compared with a matched reference group. Patients underwent echocardiography at baseline and after GDMT clinic completion.

Results: A total of 114 persons were treated in GDMT clinic. The mean age was 67.6 ± 14.6 years, and 32 (28%) were women. Among those referred, 100 (87.7%) had no contraindications for 4-drug GDMT. From baseline to clinic completion (median 15.8 weeks [Q1-Q3: 10.7-23.0 weeks]), patients without medication contraindications experienced significant increases in 4-drug GDMT use (from 21% to 88%; P < 0.001); of 4-drug GDMT recipients, 92% received angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor. GDMT clinic participants achieved higher medication doses than those in usual care, with greater achievement of ≥50% target dose of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (52% vs 8%), beta-blocker (78% vs 6.2%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (98% vs 15.6%), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (92% vs 6.2%). Target doses of all 4 drugs were reached in nearly 1 in 4 participants. HF symptoms improved (94% to 75% NYHA functional class II/III; P < 0.001) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration decreased (median 587 to 534 ng/L; P = 0.03) despite loop diuretic reduction. Additionally, we observed an absolute 6% LVEF increase (from 37% [Q1-Q3: 31%-41%] to 43% [Q1-Q3: 38%-53%]; P < 0.001) and substantial decrease in moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. GDMT titration was well-tolerated.

Conclusions: Rapid GDMT implementation via an outpatient GDMT clinic was effective, safe, and associated with improvement in key clinical parameters. The more widespread role of GDMT clinics to improve HF care warrants further study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JACC. Heart failure
JACC. Heart failure CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
2.30%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: JACC: Heart Failure publishes crucial findings on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and care of heart failure patients. The goal is to enhance understanding through timely scientific communication on disease, clinical trials, outcomes, and therapeutic advances. The Journal fosters interdisciplinary connections with neuroscience, pulmonary medicine, nephrology, electrophysiology, and surgery related to heart failure. It also covers articles on pharmacogenetics, biomarkers, and metabolomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信