利用肾脏分数血流储备评估肾动脉狭窄程度以及与血管造影术和彩色多普勒超声波检查的相关性:来自 FAIR 试点试验的数据。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Yuxi Chang, Yuxi Li, Xiufang Duan, Nan Lv, Yuanfeng Meng, Fude Zhou, Luzeng Chen, Hong Zhang, Yan Zhang, Jianping Li
{"title":"利用肾脏分数血流储备评估肾动脉狭窄程度以及与血管造影术和彩色多普勒超声波检查的相关性:来自 FAIR 试点试验的数据。","authors":"Yuxi Chang, Yuxi Li, Xiufang Duan, Nan Lv, Yuanfeng Meng, Fude Zhou, Luzeng Chen, Hong Zhang, Yan Zhang, Jianping Li","doi":"10.1038/s41440-024-01948-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Renal fractional flow reserve (rFFR), a hemodynamic evaluation indicator for functional measurement, could be used for the detection of significant renal artery stenosis (RAS). In this study, we evaluated the correlation between color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU), angiography and rFFR in assessing RAS and to validate cut-off points of ultrasound parameters for significant RAS with rFFR<0.8. A total of 77 renal artery lesions from 58 patients with at least unilateral RAS were included into this study. All patients were participated in Fractional Flow Reserve to Determine the Appropriateness of Percutaneous Renal Artery Intervention in Atherosclerosis Renal Hypertension Patients (FAIR)-pilot study (NCT05732077). The rFFR was measured through a pressure wire after renal hyperemia induced by dopamine. Peak systolic velocity (PSV), renal-to-aortic ratio (RAR), resistive index (RI) and side-to-side differences of the intrarenal resistive indices (ΔRI) were obtained by CDU. The rFFR showed good correlation with both CDU and angiography assessment methods. Among CDU parameters, the best correlation was observed in rFFR with PSV (rho = -0.668, P < 0.0001) and RAR (rho = -0.597, P < 0.001). With a rFFR<0.80 as cut-off value for significant RAS, we computed sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of CDU parameters. The most predicting cut-off points of CDU parameters were calculated as PSV for 2.415 m/s, RAR for 4.495, RI for 0.605 and ΔRI for 0.04, respectively. A PSV > 2.415 m/s provided a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 75%, accuracy of 81% and AUC of 0.84 for detecting RAS with rFFR<0.8.</p>","PeriodicalId":13029,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of renal artery stenosis using renal fractional flow reserve and correlation with angiography and color Doppler ultrasonography: data from FAIR-pilot trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yuxi Chang, Yuxi Li, Xiufang Duan, Nan Lv, Yuanfeng Meng, Fude Zhou, Luzeng Chen, Hong Zhang, Yan Zhang, Jianping Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41440-024-01948-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Renal fractional flow reserve (rFFR), a hemodynamic evaluation indicator for functional measurement, could be used for the detection of significant renal artery stenosis (RAS). In this study, we evaluated the correlation between color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU), angiography and rFFR in assessing RAS and to validate cut-off points of ultrasound parameters for significant RAS with rFFR<0.8. A total of 77 renal artery lesions from 58 patients with at least unilateral RAS were included into this study. All patients were participated in Fractional Flow Reserve to Determine the Appropriateness of Percutaneous Renal Artery Intervention in Atherosclerosis Renal Hypertension Patients (FAIR)-pilot study (NCT05732077). The rFFR was measured through a pressure wire after renal hyperemia induced by dopamine. Peak systolic velocity (PSV), renal-to-aortic ratio (RAR), resistive index (RI) and side-to-side differences of the intrarenal resistive indices (ΔRI) were obtained by CDU. The rFFR showed good correlation with both CDU and angiography assessment methods. Among CDU parameters, the best correlation was observed in rFFR with PSV (rho = -0.668, P < 0.0001) and RAR (rho = -0.597, P < 0.001). With a rFFR<0.80 as cut-off value for significant RAS, we computed sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of CDU parameters. The most predicting cut-off points of CDU parameters were calculated as PSV for 2.415 m/s, RAR for 4.495, RI for 0.605 and ΔRI for 0.04, respectively. A PSV > 2.415 m/s provided a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 75%, accuracy of 81% and AUC of 0.84 for detecting RAS with rFFR<0.8.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01948-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01948-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肾脏分数血流储备(rFFR)是功能测量的血流动力学评价指标,可用于检测明显的肾动脉狭窄(RAS)。在这项研究中,我们评估了彩色多普勒超声成像(CDU)、血管造影术和 rFFR 在评估 RAS 时的相关性,并验证了 rFFR 2.415 m/s 时检测 RAS 的敏感性为 90%,特异性为 75%,准确性为 81%,AUC 为 0.84。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of renal artery stenosis using renal fractional flow reserve and correlation with angiography and color Doppler ultrasonography: data from FAIR-pilot trial.

Renal fractional flow reserve (rFFR), a hemodynamic evaluation indicator for functional measurement, could be used for the detection of significant renal artery stenosis (RAS). In this study, we evaluated the correlation between color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU), angiography and rFFR in assessing RAS and to validate cut-off points of ultrasound parameters for significant RAS with rFFR<0.8. A total of 77 renal artery lesions from 58 patients with at least unilateral RAS were included into this study. All patients were participated in Fractional Flow Reserve to Determine the Appropriateness of Percutaneous Renal Artery Intervention in Atherosclerosis Renal Hypertension Patients (FAIR)-pilot study (NCT05732077). The rFFR was measured through a pressure wire after renal hyperemia induced by dopamine. Peak systolic velocity (PSV), renal-to-aortic ratio (RAR), resistive index (RI) and side-to-side differences of the intrarenal resistive indices (ΔRI) were obtained by CDU. The rFFR showed good correlation with both CDU and angiography assessment methods. Among CDU parameters, the best correlation was observed in rFFR with PSV (rho = -0.668, P < 0.0001) and RAR (rho = -0.597, P < 0.001). With a rFFR<0.80 as cut-off value for significant RAS, we computed sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of CDU parameters. The most predicting cut-off points of CDU parameters were calculated as PSV for 2.415 m/s, RAR for 4.495, RI for 0.605 and ΔRI for 0.04, respectively. A PSV > 2.415 m/s provided a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 75%, accuracy of 81% and AUC of 0.84 for detecting RAS with rFFR<0.8.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension Research
Hypertension Research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hypertension Research is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. The journal publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases. The journal publishes Review Articles, Articles, Correspondence and Comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信