Osstell ISQ 用于测量种植体稳定性的可靠性。

IF 1.9
Bioinformation Pub Date : 2024-08-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.6026/973206300200921
Vijay Parmar, Nureldeen An Elhammali, Omar Basheer Altaher Mohammed, Meghna Chauhan, Pushkar Gupta, Abhigyan Manas, Ankita Raj, Hrithik Chetani
{"title":"Osstell ISQ 用于测量种植体稳定性的可靠性。","authors":"Vijay Parmar, Nureldeen An Elhammali, Omar Basheer Altaher Mohammed, Meghna Chauhan, Pushkar Gupta, Abhigyan Manas, Ankita Raj, Hrithik Chetani","doi":"10.6026/973206300200921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Determining the optimal loading schedule and measuring implant stability at different times are critical tasks. Numerous tools have been created to assess implant-bone stability as a sign of a well-treated implant. Thus, the objective of this cross-sectional study was to estimate the validity of the Osstell ISQ system for assessing implant stability. Osstell ISQ was used to complete implant stability registers for 60 implants across 18 patients. Two distinct SmartPegs (types I and II) were used to complete six measurements on each implant, or three measurements in a row with each transducer. In the 1st, 2nd, and 3rdmeasurements with SmartPegs I and II, the average ISQ was 71.36, 71.31, and 71.65, and 71.02, 71.58, and 71.76, respectively. For SmartPegs I and II, equivalent values or variations below three ISQ points were found in 46.3% and 58.6% of the cases, respectively. Both SmartPegs had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96, and they also had repeatability and reproducibility of 0.96. An intra-class correlation coefficient analysis reveals nearly excellent repeatability and reproducibility for the RFA system Osstell ISQ. Measurements of Osstell ISQ have excellent repeatability.</p>","PeriodicalId":8962,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformation","volume":"20 8","pages":"921-925"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dependability of Osstell ISQ's for measuring implant stability.\",\"authors\":\"Vijay Parmar, Nureldeen An Elhammali, Omar Basheer Altaher Mohammed, Meghna Chauhan, Pushkar Gupta, Abhigyan Manas, Ankita Raj, Hrithik Chetani\",\"doi\":\"10.6026/973206300200921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Determining the optimal loading schedule and measuring implant stability at different times are critical tasks. Numerous tools have been created to assess implant-bone stability as a sign of a well-treated implant. Thus, the objective of this cross-sectional study was to estimate the validity of the Osstell ISQ system for assessing implant stability. Osstell ISQ was used to complete implant stability registers for 60 implants across 18 patients. Two distinct SmartPegs (types I and II) were used to complete six measurements on each implant, or three measurements in a row with each transducer. In the 1st, 2nd, and 3rdmeasurements with SmartPegs I and II, the average ISQ was 71.36, 71.31, and 71.65, and 71.02, 71.58, and 71.76, respectively. For SmartPegs I and II, equivalent values or variations below three ISQ points were found in 46.3% and 58.6% of the cases, respectively. Both SmartPegs had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96, and they also had repeatability and reproducibility of 0.96. An intra-class correlation coefficient analysis reveals nearly excellent repeatability and reproducibility for the RFA system Osstell ISQ. Measurements of Osstell ISQ have excellent repeatability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioinformation\",\"volume\":\"20 8\",\"pages\":\"921-925\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471406/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioinformation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300200921\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300200921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定最佳加载时间和测量不同时间段的种植体稳定性是至关重要的任务。目前已开发出许多工具来评估种植体与骨的稳定性,以此作为治疗良好的种植体的标志。因此,本横断面研究的目的是评估 Osstell ISQ 系统在评估种植体稳定性方面的有效性。研究使用 Osstell ISQ 对 18 位患者的 60 个种植体进行了种植体稳定性登记。使用两个不同的 SmartPeg(I 型和 II 型)对每个种植体进行六次测量,或使用每个传感器连续进行三次测量。在使用 SmartPegs I 和 II 进行的第一、第二和第三次测量中,平均 ISQ 分别为 71.36、71.31 和 71.65,以及 71.02、71.58 和 71.76。在 SmartPegs I 和 II 中,分别有 46.3% 和 58.6% 的情况下发现了低于三个 ISQ 点的等效值或变化。两个智能标记的类内相关系数均为 0.96,重复性和再现性也均为 0.96。类内相关系数分析表明,射频消融系统 Osstell ISQ 的重复性和再现性近乎完美。Osstell ISQ 的测量结果具有极佳的重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dependability of Osstell ISQ's for measuring implant stability.

Determining the optimal loading schedule and measuring implant stability at different times are critical tasks. Numerous tools have been created to assess implant-bone stability as a sign of a well-treated implant. Thus, the objective of this cross-sectional study was to estimate the validity of the Osstell ISQ system for assessing implant stability. Osstell ISQ was used to complete implant stability registers for 60 implants across 18 patients. Two distinct SmartPegs (types I and II) were used to complete six measurements on each implant, or three measurements in a row with each transducer. In the 1st, 2nd, and 3rdmeasurements with SmartPegs I and II, the average ISQ was 71.36, 71.31, and 71.65, and 71.02, 71.58, and 71.76, respectively. For SmartPegs I and II, equivalent values or variations below three ISQ points were found in 46.3% and 58.6% of the cases, respectively. Both SmartPegs had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96, and they also had repeatability and reproducibility of 0.96. An intra-class correlation coefficient analysis reveals nearly excellent repeatability and reproducibility for the RFA system Osstell ISQ. Measurements of Osstell ISQ have excellent repeatability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioinformation
Bioinformation MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信