第四孕期的短信:产后护理的移动医疗。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kelly Christine Bogaert, Elianna Kaplowitz, Ashish Atreja, Omara Afzal
{"title":"第四孕期的短信:产后护理的移动医疗。","authors":"Kelly Christine Bogaert, Elianna Kaplowitz, Ashish Atreja, Omara Afzal","doi":"10.1055/a-2442-7347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Rising maternal morbidity and mortality in the US is a complex problem and is often tied to the postpartum period. Postpartum visits are poorly attended leading to gaps in contraception, mental healthcare, and care for chronic conditions. mHealth, healthcare supported by mobile technologies, has been shown to improve antenatal care adherence. Our study aims to determine whether an mHealth intervention of interactive, educational text messages can improve care for women postpartum. Study Design We conducted a randomized-control trial of 191 women receiving OB/GYN care in our clinic from November 2019-April 2020. Patients were randomized postpartum to receive either routine care or routine care with mHealth text messages and appointment reminders specific to delivery type. The primary endpoint was attendance to the six-week postpartum visit with secondary endpoints of breastfeeding, contraception use, emergency visits, and postpartum depression scores (EPDS). A subgroup analysis was additionally conducted to assess the impact of some visits shifting to telehealth due to the timing of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results Patient demographics were similar between the two groups. There was no significant difference in postpartum appointment attendance between text message (n=57, 59%) and control groups (n=62, 66%, p=0.31). 117 patients were scheduled for in-person postpartum visits, and 74 for telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, with no significant difference in attendance rate between groups for either visit modality. Conclusion Automated text messages alone did not increase our primary outcome of adherence to postpartum care, even when visits were conducted by telehealth. While mHealth has proven successful in other care areas, such as antepartum follow-up, further research is needed to determine whether it is an effective method to improve adherence to postpartum care, or whether other strategies must be developed, including augmentation with human navigators.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Texting in the Fourth Trimester: mHealth for Postpartum Care.\",\"authors\":\"Kelly Christine Bogaert, Elianna Kaplowitz, Ashish Atreja, Omara Afzal\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2442-7347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective Rising maternal morbidity and mortality in the US is a complex problem and is often tied to the postpartum period. Postpartum visits are poorly attended leading to gaps in contraception, mental healthcare, and care for chronic conditions. mHealth, healthcare supported by mobile technologies, has been shown to improve antenatal care adherence. Our study aims to determine whether an mHealth intervention of interactive, educational text messages can improve care for women postpartum. Study Design We conducted a randomized-control trial of 191 women receiving OB/GYN care in our clinic from November 2019-April 2020. Patients were randomized postpartum to receive either routine care or routine care with mHealth text messages and appointment reminders specific to delivery type. The primary endpoint was attendance to the six-week postpartum visit with secondary endpoints of breastfeeding, contraception use, emergency visits, and postpartum depression scores (EPDS). A subgroup analysis was additionally conducted to assess the impact of some visits shifting to telehealth due to the timing of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results Patient demographics were similar between the two groups. There was no significant difference in postpartum appointment attendance between text message (n=57, 59%) and control groups (n=62, 66%, p=0.31). 117 patients were scheduled for in-person postpartum visits, and 74 for telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, with no significant difference in attendance rate between groups for either visit modality. Conclusion Automated text messages alone did not increase our primary outcome of adherence to postpartum care, even when visits were conducted by telehealth. While mHealth has proven successful in other care areas, such as antepartum follow-up, further research is needed to determine whether it is an effective method to improve adherence to postpartum care, or whether other strategies must be developed, including augmentation with human navigators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2442-7347\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2442-7347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标 美国孕产妇发病率和死亡率上升是一个复杂的问题,通常与产后有关。产后就诊率低导致避孕、精神保健和慢性病护理方面的缺口。移动医疗(移动技术支持下的医疗保健)已被证明可提高产前护理的依从性。我们的研究旨在确定通过交互式教育短信进行移动医疗干预能否改善产后妇女的护理。研究设计 我们在 2019 年 11 月至 2020 年 4 月期间对在本诊所接受妇产科护理的 191 名妇女进行了随机对照试验。患者在产后随机接受常规护理或带有移动医疗短信和针对分娩类型的预约提醒的常规护理。主要终点是产后六周的就诊率,次要终点是母乳喂养率、避孕药具使用率、急诊就诊率和产后抑郁评分(EPDS)。此外,还进行了分组分析,以评估由于 COVID-19 大流行的时间而导致部分就诊转为远程保健的影响。结果 两组患者的人口统计学特征相似。短信组(57 人,59%)和对照组(62 人,66%,P=0.31)的产后就诊率没有明显差异。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,117 名患者被安排进行了产后亲诊,74 名患者被安排进行了远程医疗就诊,两组患者的就诊率无明显差异。结论 仅凭自动短信并不能提高产后护理的依从性这一主要结果,即使是通过远程医疗进行就诊也是如此。虽然移动医疗在产前随访等其他护理领域已被证明是成功的,但仍需进一步研究,以确定它是否是提高产后护理依从性的有效方法,或者是否必须开发其他策略,包括增加人工导航员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Texting in the Fourth Trimester: mHealth for Postpartum Care.

Objective Rising maternal morbidity and mortality in the US is a complex problem and is often tied to the postpartum period. Postpartum visits are poorly attended leading to gaps in contraception, mental healthcare, and care for chronic conditions. mHealth, healthcare supported by mobile technologies, has been shown to improve antenatal care adherence. Our study aims to determine whether an mHealth intervention of interactive, educational text messages can improve care for women postpartum. Study Design We conducted a randomized-control trial of 191 women receiving OB/GYN care in our clinic from November 2019-April 2020. Patients were randomized postpartum to receive either routine care or routine care with mHealth text messages and appointment reminders specific to delivery type. The primary endpoint was attendance to the six-week postpartum visit with secondary endpoints of breastfeeding, contraception use, emergency visits, and postpartum depression scores (EPDS). A subgroup analysis was additionally conducted to assess the impact of some visits shifting to telehealth due to the timing of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results Patient demographics were similar between the two groups. There was no significant difference in postpartum appointment attendance between text message (n=57, 59%) and control groups (n=62, 66%, p=0.31). 117 patients were scheduled for in-person postpartum visits, and 74 for telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, with no significant difference in attendance rate between groups for either visit modality. Conclusion Automated text messages alone did not increase our primary outcome of adherence to postpartum care, even when visits were conducted by telehealth. While mHealth has proven successful in other care areas, such as antepartum follow-up, further research is needed to determine whether it is an effective method to improve adherence to postpartum care, or whether other strategies must be developed, including augmentation with human navigators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信