反态度诱惑性细节对学习的影响

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Lukas Wesenberg , Franziska Schmidt , Saskia Schwintek , Sebastian Jansen , Felix Krieglstein , Sascha Schneider , Günter Daniel Rey
{"title":"反态度诱惑性细节对学习的影响","authors":"Lukas Wesenberg ,&nbsp;Franziska Schmidt ,&nbsp;Saskia Schwintek ,&nbsp;Sebastian Jansen ,&nbsp;Felix Krieglstein ,&nbsp;Sascha Schneider ,&nbsp;Günter Daniel Rey","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Learning materials are often enriched with interesting facts that are only superficially related to the learning topic to increase student motivation. However, research suggests that such seductive details rather impair learning. Seductive details can convey a positive or negative valence, for example, when explaining advantages or disadvantages of nuclear energy. It was assumed that such seductive details are especially detrimental to learning when learners hold contrary attitudes, as cognitive conflict and dissonance could be triggered. In an experimental study, 123 university students read a text about the functioning of nuclear power plants, either without, with positive, or with negative seductive details. Results showed: the more positive learners' attitudes, the more detrimental was the inclusion of negative seductive details to learning. The inclusion of positive seductive details was detrimental regardless of learners' attitudes. Furthermore, measures of task-irrelevant thinking and extraneous cognitive load mediated detrimental effects of seductive details on learning performance.</div></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications statement</h3><div>This study showed that explaining disadvantages of nuclear power plants in addition to explaining their functioning, is especially detrimental to recalling the functioning when learners are proponents of nuclear energy. The results suggest to avoid the inclusion of valenced side notes related to polarizing topics in learning environments that set a thematically different learning goal. Considering individual attitudes towards learning topics can be important when designing instructional media.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of counterattitudinal seductive details on learning\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Wesenberg ,&nbsp;Franziska Schmidt ,&nbsp;Saskia Schwintek ,&nbsp;Sebastian Jansen ,&nbsp;Felix Krieglstein ,&nbsp;Sascha Schneider ,&nbsp;Günter Daniel Rey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Learning materials are often enriched with interesting facts that are only superficially related to the learning topic to increase student motivation. However, research suggests that such seductive details rather impair learning. Seductive details can convey a positive or negative valence, for example, when explaining advantages or disadvantages of nuclear energy. It was assumed that such seductive details are especially detrimental to learning when learners hold contrary attitudes, as cognitive conflict and dissonance could be triggered. In an experimental study, 123 university students read a text about the functioning of nuclear power plants, either without, with positive, or with negative seductive details. Results showed: the more positive learners' attitudes, the more detrimental was the inclusion of negative seductive details to learning. The inclusion of positive seductive details was detrimental regardless of learners' attitudes. Furthermore, measures of task-irrelevant thinking and extraneous cognitive load mediated detrimental effects of seductive details on learning performance.</div></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications statement</h3><div>This study showed that explaining disadvantages of nuclear power plants in addition to explaining their functioning, is especially detrimental to recalling the functioning when learners are proponents of nuclear energy. The results suggest to avoid the inclusion of valenced side notes related to polarizing topics in learning environments that set a thematically different learning goal. Considering individual attitudes towards learning topics can be important when designing instructional media.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001602\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001602","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了提高学生的学习积极性,学习材料中常常充斥着与学习主题只是表面相关的有趣事实。然而,研究表明,这些诱人的细节反而会损害学习效果。例如,在解释核能的优缺点时,诱人的细节可以传达积极或消极的情感。据推测,当学习者持有相反的态度时,这种诱导性细节尤其不利于学习,因为可能会引发认知冲突和不协调。在一项实验研究中,123 名大学生阅读了一篇关于核电站功能的文章,其中或没有、或有正面、或有负面的诱惑性细节。结果显示:学习者的态度越积极,加入负面诱惑性细节对学习越不利。无论学习者的态度如何,加入正面的诱惑性细节对学习都是不利的。这项研究表明,如果学习者是核能的支持者,那么除了解释核电站的功能之外,解释其缺点尤其不利于学习者回忆核电站的功能。研究结果表明,在设定了不同主题的学习目标的学习环境中,应避免加入与两极化话题相关的有价值的旁注。在设计教学媒体时,考虑个人对学习主题的态度非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of counterattitudinal seductive details on learning
Learning materials are often enriched with interesting facts that are only superficially related to the learning topic to increase student motivation. However, research suggests that such seductive details rather impair learning. Seductive details can convey a positive or negative valence, for example, when explaining advantages or disadvantages of nuclear energy. It was assumed that such seductive details are especially detrimental to learning when learners hold contrary attitudes, as cognitive conflict and dissonance could be triggered. In an experimental study, 123 university students read a text about the functioning of nuclear power plants, either without, with positive, or with negative seductive details. Results showed: the more positive learners' attitudes, the more detrimental was the inclusion of negative seductive details to learning. The inclusion of positive seductive details was detrimental regardless of learners' attitudes. Furthermore, measures of task-irrelevant thinking and extraneous cognitive load mediated detrimental effects of seductive details on learning performance.

Educational relevance and implications statement

This study showed that explaining disadvantages of nuclear power plants in addition to explaining their functioning, is especially detrimental to recalling the functioning when learners are proponents of nuclear energy. The results suggest to avoid the inclusion of valenced side notes related to polarizing topics in learning environments that set a thematically different learning goal. Considering individual attitudes towards learning topics can be important when designing instructional media.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信