电力零售商战略研究:零售计划设计和储备市场参与

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Hao Ming , Kairui Zhang , Ciwei Gao , Jie Yu , Xingyu Yan , Boyuan Xie
{"title":"电力零售商战略研究:零售计划设计和储备市场参与","authors":"Hao Ming ,&nbsp;Kairui Zhang ,&nbsp;Ciwei Gao ,&nbsp;Jie Yu ,&nbsp;Xingyu Yan ,&nbsp;Boyuan Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.110232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The high penetration of the renewables makes the power grid operation less reliable and risky. Demand Response programs can provide flexible capacity to alleviate the operational pressure. In a typical competitive retail market, the electricity retailer can incentivize the consumers to provide demand reduction in the reserve market and obtain additional profit from the grid. In the wholesale and reserve market, the participants receive a two-part income of certain revenue and activation revenue. In this paper, the optimal strategy of the electricity retailers is studied, including two proposed retail plans as well as the retailer’s bidding strategy in the wholesale reserve market. The proposed strategy is proven effective through a case study, demonstrating that introducing incentive-based demand response in the retail plan creates a win-win-win situation for the grid, retailers, and consumers. The experiment demonstrates that competitive bundles can generate at least 22 % additional revenue for retailers, while customized bundles can bring in an additional 23 % revenue for retailers and contribute to the system with an extra 9 % in reserve capacity bidding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 110232"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on the strategies of electricity retailers: Retail plan design and reserve market participation\",\"authors\":\"Hao Ming ,&nbsp;Kairui Zhang ,&nbsp;Ciwei Gao ,&nbsp;Jie Yu ,&nbsp;Xingyu Yan ,&nbsp;Boyuan Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.110232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The high penetration of the renewables makes the power grid operation less reliable and risky. Demand Response programs can provide flexible capacity to alleviate the operational pressure. In a typical competitive retail market, the electricity retailer can incentivize the consumers to provide demand reduction in the reserve market and obtain additional profit from the grid. In the wholesale and reserve market, the participants receive a two-part income of certain revenue and activation revenue. In this paper, the optimal strategy of the electricity retailers is studied, including two proposed retail plans as well as the retailer’s bidding strategy in the wholesale reserve market. The proposed strategy is proven effective through a case study, demonstrating that introducing incentive-based demand response in the retail plan creates a win-win-win situation for the grid, retailers, and consumers. The experiment demonstrates that competitive bundles can generate at least 22 % additional revenue for retailers, while customized bundles can bring in an additional 23 % revenue for retailers and contribute to the system with an extra 9 % in reserve capacity bidding.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061524004538\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061524004538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可再生能源的高渗透率降低了电网运行的可靠性和风险。需求响应计划可以提供灵活的容量来缓解运行压力。在典型的竞争性零售市场中,电力零售商可以激励消费者在储备市场中减少需求,并从电网中获取额外利润。在批发市场和储备市场中,参与者可获得一定收入和激活收入两部分收入。本文研究了电力零售商的最优策略,包括两种建议的零售计划以及零售商在批发储备市场的投标策略。通过案例研究证明了建议策略的有效性,表明在零售计划中引入激励性需求响应可为电网、零售商和消费者创造三赢局面。实验证明,竞争性捆绑可为零售商带来至少 22% 的额外收入,而定制捆绑可为零售商带来 23% 的额外收入,并在储备容量竞标中为系统额外贡献 9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on the strategies of electricity retailers: Retail plan design and reserve market participation
The high penetration of the renewables makes the power grid operation less reliable and risky. Demand Response programs can provide flexible capacity to alleviate the operational pressure. In a typical competitive retail market, the electricity retailer can incentivize the consumers to provide demand reduction in the reserve market and obtain additional profit from the grid. In the wholesale and reserve market, the participants receive a two-part income of certain revenue and activation revenue. In this paper, the optimal strategy of the electricity retailers is studied, including two proposed retail plans as well as the retailer’s bidding strategy in the wholesale reserve market. The proposed strategy is proven effective through a case study, demonstrating that introducing incentive-based demand response in the retail plan creates a win-win-win situation for the grid, retailers, and consumers. The experiment demonstrates that competitive bundles can generate at least 22 % additional revenue for retailers, while customized bundles can bring in an additional 23 % revenue for retailers and contribute to the system with an extra 9 % in reserve capacity bidding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
17.30%
发文量
1022
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: The journal covers theoretical developments in electrical power and energy systems and their applications. The coverage embraces: generation and network planning; reliability; long and short term operation; expert systems; neural networks; object oriented systems; system control centres; database and information systems; stock and parameter estimation; system security and adequacy; network theory, modelling and computation; small and large system dynamics; dynamic model identification; on-line control including load and switching control; protection; distribution systems; energy economics; impact of non-conventional systems; and man-machine interfaces. As well as original research papers, the journal publishes short contributions, book reviews and conference reports. All papers are peer-reviewed by at least two referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信