聚类分析能否丰富创新阻力理论?意大利移动支付使用案例

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Giulia Spinelli , Luca Gastaldi , Leo Van Hove , Ellen Van Droogenbroeck
{"title":"聚类分析能否丰富创新阻力理论?意大利移动支付使用案例","authors":"Giulia Spinelli ,&nbsp;Luca Gastaldi ,&nbsp;Leo Van Hove ,&nbsp;Ellen Van Droogenbroeck","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mobile payments provide several benefits, for consumers and merchants alike. Yet, on a worldwide scale their usage is still low. Also, the barriers to mobile payment usage are still a rather unexplored topic in the literature, which is instead focused on adoption behavior. Accordingly, our objective is to investigate the factors that hinder, respectively, mobile payment usage and intention to use by consumers. The theoretical framework for our analysis integrates the Technology Readiness Index (TRI) into the Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT). To empirically assess the model, we gathered data on mobile payment usage in Italy through a web-based survey among 1,795 consumers. For the full sample, we find that the impact of the IRT barriers is different for actual use and behavioral intention to use. Also, and most importantly, once we segment consumers based on their TRI, we find yet other results. Specifically, the impact of the IRT barriers is different across the proposed clusters. This confirms that cluster analysis does indeed add value to the IRT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 102729"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can cluster analysis enrich the innovation resistance theory? The case of mobile payment usage in Italy\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Spinelli ,&nbsp;Luca Gastaldi ,&nbsp;Leo Van Hove ,&nbsp;Ellen Van Droogenbroeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mobile payments provide several benefits, for consumers and merchants alike. Yet, on a worldwide scale their usage is still low. Also, the barriers to mobile payment usage are still a rather unexplored topic in the literature, which is instead focused on adoption behavior. Accordingly, our objective is to investigate the factors that hinder, respectively, mobile payment usage and intention to use by consumers. The theoretical framework for our analysis integrates the Technology Readiness Index (TRI) into the Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT). To empirically assess the model, we gathered data on mobile payment usage in Italy through a web-based survey among 1,795 consumers. For the full sample, we find that the impact of the IRT barriers is different for actual use and behavioral intention to use. Also, and most importantly, once we segment consumers based on their TRI, we find yet other results. Specifically, the impact of the IRT barriers is different across the proposed clusters. This confirms that cluster analysis does indeed add value to the IRT.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2400277X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2400277X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

移动支付为消费者和商家带来了诸多好处。然而,在全球范围内,移动支付的使用率仍然很低。此外,在文献中,移动支付使用的障碍仍是一个未被探讨的话题,而文献主要关注的是采用行为。因此,我们的目标是研究分别阻碍消费者使用移动支付和使用意向的因素。我们分析的理论框架将技术准备指数(TRI)与创新阻力理论(IRT)相结合。为了对模型进行实证评估,我们通过网络调查收集了意大利 1795 名消费者使用移动支付的数据。在全部样本中,我们发现 IRT 障碍对实际使用和行为使用意向的影响是不同的。此外,最重要的是,当我们根据消费者的 TRI 对其进行细分时,我们还发现了其他结果。具体地说,IRT 障碍对不同群组的影响是不同的。这证实了聚类分析确实为 IRT 增添了价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can cluster analysis enrich the innovation resistance theory? The case of mobile payment usage in Italy
Mobile payments provide several benefits, for consumers and merchants alike. Yet, on a worldwide scale their usage is still low. Also, the barriers to mobile payment usage are still a rather unexplored topic in the literature, which is instead focused on adoption behavior. Accordingly, our objective is to investigate the factors that hinder, respectively, mobile payment usage and intention to use by consumers. The theoretical framework for our analysis integrates the Technology Readiness Index (TRI) into the Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT). To empirically assess the model, we gathered data on mobile payment usage in Italy through a web-based survey among 1,795 consumers. For the full sample, we find that the impact of the IRT barriers is different for actual use and behavioral intention to use. Also, and most importantly, once we segment consumers based on their TRI, we find yet other results. Specifically, the impact of the IRT barriers is different across the proposed clusters. This confirms that cluster analysis does indeed add value to the IRT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信