随身尿液 Na/K 比值能否预测接受治疗的高血压患者 24 小时尿液 Na/K 比值?晨间随意排出的尿液与前一天收集的 24 小时尿液之间的比较。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Kimika Arakawa, Mitsuhiro Tominaga, Satoko Sakata, Takuya Tsuchihashi
{"title":"随身尿液 Na/K 比值能否预测接受治疗的高血压患者 24 小时尿液 Na/K 比值?晨间随意排出的尿液与前一天收集的 24 小时尿液之间的比较。","authors":"Kimika Arakawa, Mitsuhiro Tominaga, Satoko Sakata, Takuya Tsuchihashi","doi":"10.1038/s41440-024-01945-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The urine sodium-to-potassium (Na/K) ratio is associated with blood pressure and cardiovascular diseases. A single urine sample is preferable for determining the Na/K ratio in clinical practice. We evaluated whether the Na/K ratio measured using morning casual urine samples predicts the ratio measured using the preceding 24 h urine sample in patients with hypertension. The study included 187 hypertensive patients (mean age 66.1 years, 52.4% female) whose Na and K concentrations were measured both in 24 h (24Na/K) and casual urine the next morning (CNa/K). The Na/K ratios were 3.54 ± 1.5 in 24NaK and 2.63 ± 1.9 in CNa/K. The two estimates showed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.49, p < 0.0001), and (CNa/K-24Na/K)/24Na/K was -23.5 ± 44.4%. In the Bland-Altman plot, the mean difference was -0.91. When CNa/K was divided into three groups, <2 (low), 2-4 (medium), and ≥4 (high), the overall agreement with 24Na/K was 46.0% (86 of 187). The low group had 24.4% agreement and 75.6% underestimation (24Na/K > CNa/K); the medium group had 60.8% agreement, 30.5% underestimation, and 8.7% overestimation (24Na/K < CNa/K); and the high group had 71.8% agreement and 28.2% overestimation. These results indicate that CNa/K and 24Na/K were significantly correlated; however, CNa/K was generally lower than 24Na/K, particularly at Na/K levels < 2. Further efforts should be made to address the validity of using casual urine Na/K ratios in hypertension management practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":13029,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does casual urine Na/K ratio predict 24 h urine Na/K ratio in treated hypertensive patients? Comparison between casual urine voided in the morning vs. 24 h urine collected on the previous day.\",\"authors\":\"Kimika Arakawa, Mitsuhiro Tominaga, Satoko Sakata, Takuya Tsuchihashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41440-024-01945-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The urine sodium-to-potassium (Na/K) ratio is associated with blood pressure and cardiovascular diseases. A single urine sample is preferable for determining the Na/K ratio in clinical practice. We evaluated whether the Na/K ratio measured using morning casual urine samples predicts the ratio measured using the preceding 24 h urine sample in patients with hypertension. The study included 187 hypertensive patients (mean age 66.1 years, 52.4% female) whose Na and K concentrations were measured both in 24 h (24Na/K) and casual urine the next morning (CNa/K). The Na/K ratios were 3.54 ± 1.5 in 24NaK and 2.63 ± 1.9 in CNa/K. The two estimates showed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.49, p < 0.0001), and (CNa/K-24Na/K)/24Na/K was -23.5 ± 44.4%. In the Bland-Altman plot, the mean difference was -0.91. When CNa/K was divided into three groups, <2 (low), 2-4 (medium), and ≥4 (high), the overall agreement with 24Na/K was 46.0% (86 of 187). The low group had 24.4% agreement and 75.6% underestimation (24Na/K > CNa/K); the medium group had 60.8% agreement, 30.5% underestimation, and 8.7% overestimation (24Na/K < CNa/K); and the high group had 71.8% agreement and 28.2% overestimation. These results indicate that CNa/K and 24Na/K were significantly correlated; however, CNa/K was generally lower than 24Na/K, particularly at Na/K levels < 2. Further efforts should be made to address the validity of using casual urine Na/K ratios in hypertension management practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01945-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01945-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尿液钠钾(Na/K)比值与血压和心血管疾病有关。在临床实践中,测定 Na/K 比值最好采用单一尿样。我们评估了高血压患者晨起尿样中测得的 Na/K 比值是否能预测前 24 小时尿样中测得的 Na/K 比值。研究对象包括 187 名高血压患者(平均年龄 66.1 岁,52.4% 为女性),他们的 Na 和 K 浓度都是在 24 小时尿样(24Na/K)和次日晨起尿样(CNa/K)中测定的。24NaK 的 Na/K 比值为 3.54 ± 1.5,CNa/K 的 Na/K 比值为 2.63 ± 1.9。这两个估计值显示出明显的正相关性(r = 0.49,p CNa/K);中等组的一致性为 60.8%,低估了 30.5%,高估了 8.7%(24Na/K < CNa/K);高等组的一致性为 71.8%,高估了 28.2%。这些结果表明,CNa/K 和 24Na/K 显著相关;但 CNa/K 通常低于 24Na/K,尤其是当 Na/K 水平小于 2 时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does casual urine Na/K ratio predict 24 h urine Na/K ratio in treated hypertensive patients? Comparison between casual urine voided in the morning vs. 24 h urine collected on the previous day.

The urine sodium-to-potassium (Na/K) ratio is associated with blood pressure and cardiovascular diseases. A single urine sample is preferable for determining the Na/K ratio in clinical practice. We evaluated whether the Na/K ratio measured using morning casual urine samples predicts the ratio measured using the preceding 24 h urine sample in patients with hypertension. The study included 187 hypertensive patients (mean age 66.1 years, 52.4% female) whose Na and K concentrations were measured both in 24 h (24Na/K) and casual urine the next morning (CNa/K). The Na/K ratios were 3.54 ± 1.5 in 24NaK and 2.63 ± 1.9 in CNa/K. The two estimates showed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.49, p < 0.0001), and (CNa/K-24Na/K)/24Na/K was -23.5 ± 44.4%. In the Bland-Altman plot, the mean difference was -0.91. When CNa/K was divided into three groups, <2 (low), 2-4 (medium), and ≥4 (high), the overall agreement with 24Na/K was 46.0% (86 of 187). The low group had 24.4% agreement and 75.6% underestimation (24Na/K > CNa/K); the medium group had 60.8% agreement, 30.5% underestimation, and 8.7% overestimation (24Na/K < CNa/K); and the high group had 71.8% agreement and 28.2% overestimation. These results indicate that CNa/K and 24Na/K were significantly correlated; however, CNa/K was generally lower than 24Na/K, particularly at Na/K levels < 2. Further efforts should be made to address the validity of using casual urine Na/K ratios in hypertension management practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension Research
Hypertension Research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hypertension Research is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. The journal publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases. The journal publishes Review Articles, Articles, Correspondence and Comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信