2012 年国际舞蹈标准测量系统(IADMS)标准测量倡议的六项建议的最新进展:评估和报告舞蹈演员的能力、风险因素和伤害。

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Sarah J Kenny, Janine H Stubbe, Chris T V Swain, Joshua Honrado, Claire E Hiller, Tom M Welsh, Marijeanne J Liederbach
{"title":"2012 年国际舞蹈标准测量系统(IADMS)标准测量倡议的六项建议的最新进展:评估和报告舞蹈演员的能力、风险因素和伤害。","authors":"Sarah J Kenny, Janine H Stubbe, Chris T V Swain, Joshua Honrado, Claire E Hiller, Tom M Welsh, Marijeanne J Liederbach","doi":"10.1177/1089313X241288998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2012, the Standard Measures Consensus Initiative (SMCI) of the International Association for Dance Medicine and Science (IADMS) presented 6 recommendations regarding dance injury surveillance, definitions of injury and exposure, dance-specific screening, risk reduction strategies, and collaborative data management. The aim was to standardize risk factor measurement and injury reporting by researchers in dance medicine and science. Since then, numerous reports on the recording and reporting of injury data in sport and performing arts have been published.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IADMS commissioned SMCI to update the 2012 recommendations, a process that involved 3 stages: (1) current field experts were invited to join SMCI, (2) SMCI members reviewed recent and relevant sport and performing arts literature, then drafted, discussed, and revised section updates, (3) IADMS invited individuals representing diverse backgrounds in the IADMS community to critically review drafted updates. The final update serves as a bridge from the 6 recommendations in the 2012 report to the current state of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We continue to encourage use of dance injury surveillance systems and support that surveillance protocols be fit-for-purpose, and that failure to use clear and consistent injury definitions perpetuates a lack of rigor in dance injury research. Based on new evidence, we recommend that some aspects of injury surveillance be self-reported, that the choice of dance exposure measures be dependent on the research question, contextual factors, and type of injury/health problem(s) of interest, and that studies using dance-specific screening articulate specific objectives, validity, and reliability of each protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future studies should focus on the development, implementation, and evaluation of strategies to minimize injury risk to improve consistency and rigor in data collection and research reporting on the health and wellness of dancer populations, thus facilitating a future dance injury consensus statement similar to recent statements published for sports and circus arts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","volume":" ","pages":"1089313X241288998"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Update on the Six Recommendations from the 2012 IADMS Standard Measures Initiative: Assessing and Reporting Dancer Capacities, Risk Factors, and Injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah J Kenny, Janine H Stubbe, Chris T V Swain, Joshua Honrado, Claire E Hiller, Tom M Welsh, Marijeanne J Liederbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1089313X241288998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2012, the Standard Measures Consensus Initiative (SMCI) of the International Association for Dance Medicine and Science (IADMS) presented 6 recommendations regarding dance injury surveillance, definitions of injury and exposure, dance-specific screening, risk reduction strategies, and collaborative data management. The aim was to standardize risk factor measurement and injury reporting by researchers in dance medicine and science. Since then, numerous reports on the recording and reporting of injury data in sport and performing arts have been published.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IADMS commissioned SMCI to update the 2012 recommendations, a process that involved 3 stages: (1) current field experts were invited to join SMCI, (2) SMCI members reviewed recent and relevant sport and performing arts literature, then drafted, discussed, and revised section updates, (3) IADMS invited individuals representing diverse backgrounds in the IADMS community to critically review drafted updates. The final update serves as a bridge from the 6 recommendations in the 2012 report to the current state of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We continue to encourage use of dance injury surveillance systems and support that surveillance protocols be fit-for-purpose, and that failure to use clear and consistent injury definitions perpetuates a lack of rigor in dance injury research. Based on new evidence, we recommend that some aspects of injury surveillance be self-reported, that the choice of dance exposure measures be dependent on the research question, contextual factors, and type of injury/health problem(s) of interest, and that studies using dance-specific screening articulate specific objectives, validity, and reliability of each protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future studies should focus on the development, implementation, and evaluation of strategies to minimize injury risk to improve consistency and rigor in data collection and research reporting on the health and wellness of dancer populations, thus facilitating a future dance injury consensus statement similar to recent statements published for sports and circus arts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1089313X241288998\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X241288998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X241288998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:2012 年,国际舞蹈医学与科学协会(IADMS)的 "标准措施共识倡议"(SMCI)提出了 6 项建议,涉及舞蹈损伤监测、损伤和暴露的定义、舞蹈特定筛查、风险降低策略以及合作数据管理。其目的是规范舞蹈医学与科学研究人员的风险因素测量和损伤报告。从那时起,有关体育和表演艺术领域损伤数据记录和报告的许多报告已经出版:国际舞蹈医学与表演艺术学会委托 SMCI 更新 2012 年的建议,这一过程包括三个阶段:(1)邀请当前领域的专家加入 SMCI;(2)SMCI 成员审查近期相关的体育和表演艺术文献,然后起草、讨论和修订更新章节;(3)国际舞蹈医学与表演艺术学会邀请代表国际舞蹈医学与表演艺术学会社区不同背景的个人对起草的更新章节进行严格审查。最终更新版是 2012 年报告中的 6 项建议与当前证据状态之间的桥梁:结果:我们继续鼓励使用舞蹈损伤监测系统,并支持监测协议应符合目的,如果不使用清晰一致的损伤定义,就会导致舞蹈损伤研究长期缺乏严谨性。基于新的证据,我们建议伤害监测的某些方面应采用自我报告的方式,舞蹈暴露测量方法的选择应取决于研究问题、背景因素以及感兴趣的伤害/健康问题的类型,使用特定舞蹈筛查的研究应阐明每个方案的具体目标、有效性和可靠性:今后的研究应侧重于开发、实施和评估最大限度降低损伤风险的策略,以提高数据收集和研究报告的一致性和严谨性,从而促进未来舞蹈损伤共识声明的发布,类似于最近发布的体育和马戏艺术声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Update on the Six Recommendations from the 2012 IADMS Standard Measures Initiative: Assessing and Reporting Dancer Capacities, Risk Factors, and Injuries.

Introduction: In 2012, the Standard Measures Consensus Initiative (SMCI) of the International Association for Dance Medicine and Science (IADMS) presented 6 recommendations regarding dance injury surveillance, definitions of injury and exposure, dance-specific screening, risk reduction strategies, and collaborative data management. The aim was to standardize risk factor measurement and injury reporting by researchers in dance medicine and science. Since then, numerous reports on the recording and reporting of injury data in sport and performing arts have been published.

Methods: IADMS commissioned SMCI to update the 2012 recommendations, a process that involved 3 stages: (1) current field experts were invited to join SMCI, (2) SMCI members reviewed recent and relevant sport and performing arts literature, then drafted, discussed, and revised section updates, (3) IADMS invited individuals representing diverse backgrounds in the IADMS community to critically review drafted updates. The final update serves as a bridge from the 6 recommendations in the 2012 report to the current state of evidence.

Results: We continue to encourage use of dance injury surveillance systems and support that surveillance protocols be fit-for-purpose, and that failure to use clear and consistent injury definitions perpetuates a lack of rigor in dance injury research. Based on new evidence, we recommend that some aspects of injury surveillance be self-reported, that the choice of dance exposure measures be dependent on the research question, contextual factors, and type of injury/health problem(s) of interest, and that studies using dance-specific screening articulate specific objectives, validity, and reliability of each protocol.

Conclusions: Future studies should focus on the development, implementation, and evaluation of strategies to minimize injury risk to improve consistency and rigor in data collection and research reporting on the health and wellness of dancer populations, thus facilitating a future dance injury consensus statement similar to recent statements published for sports and circus arts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信