预先护理规划的定义和建议:亚洲五个地区的德尔菲研究。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Masanori Mori, Helen Y L Chan, Cheng-Pei Lin, Sun-Hyun Kim, Raymond Ng Han Lip, Diah Martina, Kwok Keung Yuen, Shao-Yi Cheng, Sayaka Takenouchi, Sang-Yeon Suh, Sumytra Menon, Jungyoung Kim, Ping-Jen Chen, Futoshi Iwata, Shimon Tashiro, Oi Ling Annie Kwok, Jen-Kuei Peng, Hsien-Liang Huang, Tatsuya Morita, Ida J Korfage, Judith A C Rietjens, Yoshiyuki Kizawa
{"title":"预先护理规划的定义和建议:亚洲五个地区的德尔菲研究。","authors":"Masanori Mori, Helen Y L Chan, Cheng-Pei Lin, Sun-Hyun Kim, Raymond Ng Han Lip, Diah Martina, Kwok Keung Yuen, Shao-Yi Cheng, Sayaka Takenouchi, Sang-Yeon Suh, Sumytra Menon, Jungyoung Kim, Ping-Jen Chen, Futoshi Iwata, Shimon Tashiro, Oi Ling Annie Kwok, Jen-Kuei Peng, Hsien-Liang Huang, Tatsuya Morita, Ida J Korfage, Judith A C Rietjens, Yoshiyuki Kizawa","doi":"10.1177/02692163241284088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Confucian-influenced Asian societies, explicit end-of-life conversations are uncommon and family involvement in decision-making is crucial, which complicates the adoption of culturally sensitive advance care planning.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop a consensus definition of advance care planning and provide recommendations for patient-centered and family-based initiatives in Asia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A five-round Delphi study was performed. The rating of a definition and 84 recommendations developed based on systematic reviews was performed by experts with clinical or research expertise using a 7-point Likert scale. A median = 1 and an inter-quartile range = 0-1 were considered very strong agreement and very strong consensus, respectively.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>The Delphi study was carried out by multidisciplinary experts on advance care planning in five Asian sectors (Hong Kong/Japan/Korea/Singapore/Taiwan).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven of 115 (67%) experts rated the statements. Advance care planning is defined as \"a process that enables individuals to identify their values, to define goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care, to discuss these values, goals, and preferences with family and/or other closely related persons, and health-care providers, and to record and review these preferences if appropriate.\" Recommendations in the domains of considerations for a person-centered and family-based approach, as well as elements, roles and tasks, timing for initiative, policy and regulation, and evaluations received high levels of agreement and consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our definition and recommendations can guide practice, education, research, and policy-making in advance care planning for Asian populations. Our findings will aid future research in crafting culturally sensitive advance care planning interventions, ensuring Asians receive value-aligned care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2692163241284088"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Definition and recommendations of advance care planning: A Delphi study in five Asian sectors.\",\"authors\":\"Masanori Mori, Helen Y L Chan, Cheng-Pei Lin, Sun-Hyun Kim, Raymond Ng Han Lip, Diah Martina, Kwok Keung Yuen, Shao-Yi Cheng, Sayaka Takenouchi, Sang-Yeon Suh, Sumytra Menon, Jungyoung Kim, Ping-Jen Chen, Futoshi Iwata, Shimon Tashiro, Oi Ling Annie Kwok, Jen-Kuei Peng, Hsien-Liang Huang, Tatsuya Morita, Ida J Korfage, Judith A C Rietjens, Yoshiyuki Kizawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692163241284088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Confucian-influenced Asian societies, explicit end-of-life conversations are uncommon and family involvement in decision-making is crucial, which complicates the adoption of culturally sensitive advance care planning.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop a consensus definition of advance care planning and provide recommendations for patient-centered and family-based initiatives in Asia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A five-round Delphi study was performed. The rating of a definition and 84 recommendations developed based on systematic reviews was performed by experts with clinical or research expertise using a 7-point Likert scale. A median = 1 and an inter-quartile range = 0-1 were considered very strong agreement and very strong consensus, respectively.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>The Delphi study was carried out by multidisciplinary experts on advance care planning in five Asian sectors (Hong Kong/Japan/Korea/Singapore/Taiwan).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven of 115 (67%) experts rated the statements. Advance care planning is defined as \\\"a process that enables individuals to identify their values, to define goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care, to discuss these values, goals, and preferences with family and/or other closely related persons, and health-care providers, and to record and review these preferences if appropriate.\\\" Recommendations in the domains of considerations for a person-centered and family-based approach, as well as elements, roles and tasks, timing for initiative, policy and regulation, and evaluations received high levels of agreement and consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our definition and recommendations can guide practice, education, research, and policy-making in advance care planning for Asian populations. Our findings will aid future research in crafting culturally sensitive advance care planning interventions, ensuring Asians receive value-aligned care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2692163241284088\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241284088\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241284088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在受儒家思想影响的亚洲社会中,明确的临终对话并不常见,家人参与决策至关重要,这使得采用具有文化敏感性的预先护理计划变得更加复杂。目的:为预先护理计划制定一个共识定义,并为在亚洲开展以患者为中心、以家庭为基础的行动提供建议:设计:进行了五轮德尔菲研究。由具有临床或研究专长的专家采用 7 点李克特量表对基于系统综述制定的定义和 84 项建议进行评分。中位数 = 1 和四分位数间距 = 0-1 分别被视为非常一致和非常一致:德尔菲研究由亚洲五个地区(香港/日本/韩国/新加坡/台湾)的多学科专家进行:115 位专家中有 77 位(67%)对陈述进行了评分。预先护理规划被定义为 "一个过程,使个人能够识别自己的价值观,确定未来医疗和护理的目标和偏好,与家人和/或其他密切相关的人以及医疗服务提供者讨论这些价值观、目标和偏好,并在适当的情况下记录和审查这些偏好"。在 "以人为本和以家庭为基础的方法的注意事项"、"要素、角色和任务"、"采取举措的时机"、"政策和法规 "以及 "评估 "等领域的建议获得了高度的认同和共识:我们的定义和建议可以指导亚裔人群预先护理规划的实践、教育、研究和政策制定。我们的研究结果将有助于未来的研究,以制定具有文化敏感性的预先护理规划干预措施,确保亚裔获得与价值相一致的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Definition and recommendations of advance care planning: A Delphi study in five Asian sectors.

Background: In Confucian-influenced Asian societies, explicit end-of-life conversations are uncommon and family involvement in decision-making is crucial, which complicates the adoption of culturally sensitive advance care planning.

Aim: To develop a consensus definition of advance care planning and provide recommendations for patient-centered and family-based initiatives in Asia.

Design: A five-round Delphi study was performed. The rating of a definition and 84 recommendations developed based on systematic reviews was performed by experts with clinical or research expertise using a 7-point Likert scale. A median = 1 and an inter-quartile range = 0-1 were considered very strong agreement and very strong consensus, respectively.

Setting/participants: The Delphi study was carried out by multidisciplinary experts on advance care planning in five Asian sectors (Hong Kong/Japan/Korea/Singapore/Taiwan).

Results: Seventy-seven of 115 (67%) experts rated the statements. Advance care planning is defined as "a process that enables individuals to identify their values, to define goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care, to discuss these values, goals, and preferences with family and/or other closely related persons, and health-care providers, and to record and review these preferences if appropriate." Recommendations in the domains of considerations for a person-centered and family-based approach, as well as elements, roles and tasks, timing for initiative, policy and regulation, and evaluations received high levels of agreement and consensus.

Conclusions: Our definition and recommendations can guide practice, education, research, and policy-making in advance care planning for Asian populations. Our findings will aid future research in crafting culturally sensitive advance care planning interventions, ensuring Asians receive value-aligned care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信