D Kumar, D Kumar, U Irfan, Y S Yadav, R K Yadav, V Kanti, P Sharma, S K Shukla
{"title":"CRIB 评分 II 和灌注指数在评估患病早产新生儿病情严重程度中的预测值和相关性:一项观察性研究。","authors":"D Kumar, D Kumar, U Irfan, Y S Yadav, R K Yadav, V Kanti, P Sharma, S K Shukla","doi":"10.3233/NPM-240084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perfusion index (PI) and CRIB (Clinical risk index of babies) Score II both are minimally invasive tools for prediction of mortality and morbidity in sick neonates. This study aims to know the predictive values of both PI and CRIB Score II in assessment of severity of illness in preterm neonates of 28 to 32 weeks and their correlation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PI and CRIB II Score of 125 sick preterm neonates admitted in NICU were assessed within 12 hours of admission. Severity noted in form of outcome. Correlation between PI and CRIB Score II were observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were plotted for PI and CIRB Score II with outcome (discharged vs expired). Area under curve for perfusion index was 0.776 at 95% confidence interval. Optimum cutoff point based on ROC curve was 1.65 with sensitivity of 84%., specificity of 37.2% with positive predictive value of 70% and negative predictive value of 57%. Area under curve for CRIB Score II was 0.622 (p value < 0.028), optimum cut off point based on ROC curve for CRIB II score was 3.5 with sensitivity 79.10% of specificity of 40% positive predictive value is 43.03% and negative predictive value of 76.9%. Spearman's correlation coefficient between PI and CRIB II score was -0.272 and p value is 0.002.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study concluded that perfusion index (p < 0.001) is better for predicting the severity compared to CRIB II score (p < 0.028). A weak negative correlation exists between PI and CRIB II score (r = -0.272).</p>","PeriodicalId":16537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"723-730"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive values and correlation of CRIB Score II and perfusion index in assessment of severity of illness in sick preterm neonates: An observational study.\",\"authors\":\"D Kumar, D Kumar, U Irfan, Y S Yadav, R K Yadav, V Kanti, P Sharma, S K Shukla\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/NPM-240084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perfusion index (PI) and CRIB (Clinical risk index of babies) Score II both are minimally invasive tools for prediction of mortality and morbidity in sick neonates. This study aims to know the predictive values of both PI and CRIB Score II in assessment of severity of illness in preterm neonates of 28 to 32 weeks and their correlation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PI and CRIB II Score of 125 sick preterm neonates admitted in NICU were assessed within 12 hours of admission. Severity noted in form of outcome. Correlation between PI and CRIB Score II were observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were plotted for PI and CIRB Score II with outcome (discharged vs expired). Area under curve for perfusion index was 0.776 at 95% confidence interval. Optimum cutoff point based on ROC curve was 1.65 with sensitivity of 84%., specificity of 37.2% with positive predictive value of 70% and negative predictive value of 57%. Area under curve for CRIB Score II was 0.622 (p value < 0.028), optimum cut off point based on ROC curve for CRIB II score was 3.5 with sensitivity 79.10% of specificity of 40% positive predictive value is 43.03% and negative predictive value of 76.9%. Spearman's correlation coefficient between PI and CRIB II score was -0.272 and p value is 0.002.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study concluded that perfusion index (p < 0.001) is better for predicting the severity compared to CRIB II score (p < 0.028). A weak negative correlation exists between PI and CRIB II score (r = -0.272).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"723-730\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/NPM-240084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/NPM-240084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:灌注指数(PI)和CRIB(婴儿临床风险指数)评分II都是预测患病新生儿死亡率和发病率的微创工具。本研究旨在了解 PI 和 CRIB 评分 II 在评估 28 至 32 周早产新生儿病情严重程度时的预测值及其相关性:方法:在新生儿重症监护室对 125 名入院 12 小时内的早产新生儿进行 PI 和 CRIB II 评分评估。以结果的形式记录严重程度。观察 PI 和 CRIB 评分 II 之间的相关性:绘制了PI和CIRB评分II与预后(出院与死亡)的接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)。灌注指数的曲线下面积为 0.776,置信区间为 95%。根据 ROC 曲线,最佳临界点为 1.65,灵敏度为 84%,特异性为 37.2%,阳性预测值为 70%,阴性预测值为 57%。CRIB 评分 II 的曲线下面积为 0.622(P 值 结论:CRIB 评分 II 的曲线下面积为 0.622(P 值):本研究得出结论,灌注指数(p
Predictive values and correlation of CRIB Score II and perfusion index in assessment of severity of illness in sick preterm neonates: An observational study.
Background: Perfusion index (PI) and CRIB (Clinical risk index of babies) Score II both are minimally invasive tools for prediction of mortality and morbidity in sick neonates. This study aims to know the predictive values of both PI and CRIB Score II in assessment of severity of illness in preterm neonates of 28 to 32 weeks and their correlation.
Methods: PI and CRIB II Score of 125 sick preterm neonates admitted in NICU were assessed within 12 hours of admission. Severity noted in form of outcome. Correlation between PI and CRIB Score II were observed.
Results: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were plotted for PI and CIRB Score II with outcome (discharged vs expired). Area under curve for perfusion index was 0.776 at 95% confidence interval. Optimum cutoff point based on ROC curve was 1.65 with sensitivity of 84%., specificity of 37.2% with positive predictive value of 70% and negative predictive value of 57%. Area under curve for CRIB Score II was 0.622 (p value < 0.028), optimum cut off point based on ROC curve for CRIB II score was 3.5 with sensitivity 79.10% of specificity of 40% positive predictive value is 43.03% and negative predictive value of 76.9%. Spearman's correlation coefficient between PI and CRIB II score was -0.272 and p value is 0.002.
Conclusion: This study concluded that perfusion index (p < 0.001) is better for predicting the severity compared to CRIB II score (p < 0.028). A weak negative correlation exists between PI and CRIB II score (r = -0.272).