尿道中段吊带术后妇女的性功能和不适。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Marie Bugnon, Cécilia Ricard, Renaud Detayrac
{"title":"尿道中段吊带术后妇女的性功能和不适。","authors":"Marie Bugnon, Cécilia Ricard, Renaud Detayrac","doi":"10.1007/s00192-024-05929-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate medium-term sexual function following midurethral sling (MUS) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an ambidirectional observational study with a nested matched case-control study performed in a tertiary urogynecology referral center. We assessed sexual discomfort and function using the Pelvi-Perineal Surgery Sexuality Questionnaire (PPSSQ), pre- and postoperatively, in a patient cohort that comprised patients who underwent an MUS procedure between January 2014 and December 2019. We recruited a group of volunteers without a previous history of MUS surgery. The nested case-control study comprised a subgroup of cases from the patients' cohort matched to controls from the volunteer's cohort. Cases and controls were matched for age and menopausal status at a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 118 patients and 128 volunteers were recruited. Of these, 105 cases and 105 controls comprised the nested case-control study. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean discomfort and pain scores between cases and controls (19.8 ± 21.2 vs 15.4 ± 15.7 respectively; p = 0.19 primary outcome). Similarly, there was no difference in mean sexual health scores. However, the rate of reported sensation of an obstruction in the vagina was significantly more in cases (16%) than in controls (2.6%; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences between patient-reported sexual function at follow-up compared with their recollection before surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Midurethral sling surgery does not seem to impair the quality of sexual life in the medium term.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual Function and Discomfort in Women After Midurethral Sling Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Marie Bugnon, Cécilia Ricard, Renaud Detayrac\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-024-05929-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate medium-term sexual function following midurethral sling (MUS) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an ambidirectional observational study with a nested matched case-control study performed in a tertiary urogynecology referral center. We assessed sexual discomfort and function using the Pelvi-Perineal Surgery Sexuality Questionnaire (PPSSQ), pre- and postoperatively, in a patient cohort that comprised patients who underwent an MUS procedure between January 2014 and December 2019. We recruited a group of volunteers without a previous history of MUS surgery. The nested case-control study comprised a subgroup of cases from the patients' cohort matched to controls from the volunteer's cohort. Cases and controls were matched for age and menopausal status at a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 118 patients and 128 volunteers were recruited. Of these, 105 cases and 105 controls comprised the nested case-control study. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean discomfort and pain scores between cases and controls (19.8 ± 21.2 vs 15.4 ± 15.7 respectively; p = 0.19 primary outcome). Similarly, there was no difference in mean sexual health scores. However, the rate of reported sensation of an obstruction in the vagina was significantly more in cases (16%) than in controls (2.6%; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences between patient-reported sexual function at follow-up compared with their recollection before surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Midurethral sling surgery does not seem to impair the quality of sexual life in the medium term.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05929-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05929-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和假设:本研究旨在评估尿道中段吊带术(MUS)术后的中期性功能:这是一项在三级泌尿妇科转诊中心进行的嵌套匹配病例对照研究。我们在2014年1月至2019年12月期间接受MUS手术的患者队列中使用盆腔会阴手术性生活问卷(PPSSQ)对术前和术后的性不适和性功能进行了评估。我们还招募了一组既往无 MUS 手术史的志愿者。嵌套病例对照研究由患者队列中的病例亚组与志愿者队列中的对照组组成。病例和对照组的年龄和绝经状态按 1:1 的比例匹配:共招募了 118 名患者和 128 名志愿者。结果:共招募了 118 名患者和 128 名志愿者,其中 105 名病例和 105 名对照组成了巢式病例对照研究。病例和对照组的平均不适和疼痛评分没有明显的统计学差异(分别为 19.8 ± 21.2 vs 15.4 ± 15.7;主要结果 p = 0.19)。同样,平均性健康评分也没有差异。然而,病例(16%)报告的阴道阻塞感明显高于对照组(2.6%;P = 0.001)。患者随访时报告的性功能与手术前的回忆没有明显差异:结论:从中期来看,尿道中段吊带手术似乎不会影响性生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sexual Function and Discomfort in Women After Midurethral Sling Surgery.

Introduction and hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate medium-term sexual function following midurethral sling (MUS) surgery.

Methods: This was an ambidirectional observational study with a nested matched case-control study performed in a tertiary urogynecology referral center. We assessed sexual discomfort and function using the Pelvi-Perineal Surgery Sexuality Questionnaire (PPSSQ), pre- and postoperatively, in a patient cohort that comprised patients who underwent an MUS procedure between January 2014 and December 2019. We recruited a group of volunteers without a previous history of MUS surgery. The nested case-control study comprised a subgroup of cases from the patients' cohort matched to controls from the volunteer's cohort. Cases and controls were matched for age and menopausal status at a 1:1 ratio.

Results: A total of 118 patients and 128 volunteers were recruited. Of these, 105 cases and 105 controls comprised the nested case-control study. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean discomfort and pain scores between cases and controls (19.8 ± 21.2 vs 15.4 ± 15.7 respectively; p = 0.19 primary outcome). Similarly, there was no difference in mean sexual health scores. However, the rate of reported sensation of an obstruction in the vagina was significantly more in cases (16%) than in controls (2.6%; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences between patient-reported sexual function at follow-up compared with their recollection before surgery.

Conclusion: Midurethral sling surgery does not seem to impair the quality of sexual life in the medium term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信