F Matos Semedo, E Tomaz, C Martins, L Taborda-Barata, F Inácio
{"title":"哮喘和鼻炎患者对 Lep d 2- Lepidoglyphus destructor 的过敏反应。","authors":"F Matos Semedo, E Tomaz, C Martins, L Taborda-Barata, F Inácio","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Mites are responsible for allergic diseases, such as asthma and rhinitis, in nearly 1.5% of the world population. It is known that nowadays, besides House Dust Mites (HDM), Storage Mites (SM) are important sensitisers in urban non-occupational dwellings, predominantly in the Mediterranean area. The main objective of our study was to analyse the clinical relevance of the most prevalent SM, <i>Lepidoglyphus destructor</i>, by assessing the relationship between sensitisation to the major molecular allergen Lep d 2 and allergic respiratory disease phenotype in an urban population monosensitised to this molecular allergen. <b>Methods.</b> Cross-sectional study which included consecutive patients evaluated in our Allergy Department between 2012 and 2018, from urban non-occupational setting, with rhinitis and/or asthma, perennial symptoms and proven sensitisation to SM Lep d 2, tested using ImmunoCAP Immuno Solid-phase Allergen Chip (ISAC) technology, which detects 112 allergens. <b>Results.</b> A total of 37 allergic patients were included (23 female), aged 20.1 ± 12.8, min-max 5-58 years-old. The molecular sensitisation profile showed 18.9% of <i>L. destructor</i> mite monosensitised patients, having only sIgE to Lep d 2. This subset of patients mainly had allergic rhinitis, with 28.6% also being asthmatic. Regarding severity, most patients showed a persistent moderate phenotype of respiratory disease. The mean value of Lep d 2 sIgE was 8.3 ± 9.8 ISU-E, lower than in mite polysensitised patients (21.7 ± 21.5, p = 0.049). <b>Conclusions.</b> Our proof-of-concept study focused on Lep d 2 monosensitisation, showed that SM may have clinical relevance in perennial allergic asthma and rhinitis, and should be taken into account when assessing and treating allergic respiratory disease. <b>Conclusions</b>. The present survey demonstrated that Italian primary care pediatricians accomplish ARIA guidelines and adapt treatment on the basis of the intensity of symptoms. Corticosteroids and antihistamines are the most common prescribed medications. Nasal lavages are also popular.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitisation to Lep d 2- Lepidoglyphus destructor allergy in asthma and rhinitis.\",\"authors\":\"F Matos Semedo, E Tomaz, C Martins, L Taborda-Barata, F Inácio\",\"doi\":\"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Mites are responsible for allergic diseases, such as asthma and rhinitis, in nearly 1.5% of the world population. It is known that nowadays, besides House Dust Mites (HDM), Storage Mites (SM) are important sensitisers in urban non-occupational dwellings, predominantly in the Mediterranean area. The main objective of our study was to analyse the clinical relevance of the most prevalent SM, <i>Lepidoglyphus destructor</i>, by assessing the relationship between sensitisation to the major molecular allergen Lep d 2 and allergic respiratory disease phenotype in an urban population monosensitised to this molecular allergen. <b>Methods.</b> Cross-sectional study which included consecutive patients evaluated in our Allergy Department between 2012 and 2018, from urban non-occupational setting, with rhinitis and/or asthma, perennial symptoms and proven sensitisation to SM Lep d 2, tested using ImmunoCAP Immuno Solid-phase Allergen Chip (ISAC) technology, which detects 112 allergens. <b>Results.</b> A total of 37 allergic patients were included (23 female), aged 20.1 ± 12.8, min-max 5-58 years-old. The molecular sensitisation profile showed 18.9% of <i>L. destructor</i> mite monosensitised patients, having only sIgE to Lep d 2. This subset of patients mainly had allergic rhinitis, with 28.6% also being asthmatic. Regarding severity, most patients showed a persistent moderate phenotype of respiratory disease. The mean value of Lep d 2 sIgE was 8.3 ± 9.8 ISU-E, lower than in mite polysensitised patients (21.7 ± 21.5, p = 0.049). <b>Conclusions.</b> Our proof-of-concept study focused on Lep d 2 monosensitisation, showed that SM may have clinical relevance in perennial allergic asthma and rhinitis, and should be taken into account when assessing and treating allergic respiratory disease. <b>Conclusions</b>. The present survey demonstrated that Italian primary care pediatricians accomplish ARIA guidelines and adapt treatment on the basis of the intensity of symptoms. Corticosteroids and antihistamines are the most common prescribed medications. Nasal lavages are also popular.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:背景。螨虫是导致过敏性疾病(如哮喘和鼻炎)的罪魁祸首,全世界有近 1.5%的人患有这种疾病。众所周知,如今除了屋尘螨(HDM)之外,储藏螨(SM)也是城市非职业性住宅(主要在地中海地区)中的重要致敏原。我们研究的主要目的是通过评估对主要分子过敏原 Lep d 2 的致敏与对该分子过敏原单敏的城市人群中过敏性呼吸道疾病表型之间的关系,分析最常见的储螨--破坏螨的临床相关性。研究方法横断面研究纳入了2012年至2018年期间在我院过敏科接受评估的连续患者,这些患者来自城市非职业环境,患有鼻炎和/或哮喘,常年出现症状,并已证实对SM Lep d 2过敏,使用可检测112种过敏原的ImmunoCAP免疫固相过敏原芯片(ISAC)技术进行检测。结果。共纳入 37 名过敏症患者(23 名女性),年龄为 20.1 ± 12.8 岁,最小-最大年龄为 5-58 岁。分子致敏图谱显示,18.9%的破坏螨患者为单敏患者,只对 Lep d 2 产生 sIgE。这部分患者主要患有过敏性鼻炎,其中 28.6% 还患有哮喘。就严重程度而言,大多数患者的呼吸道疾病表现为持续的中度表型。Lep d 2 sIgE 的平均值为 8.3 ± 9.8 ISU-E,低于螨虫多敏患者(21.7 ± 21.5,p = 0.049)。结论我们的概念验证研究侧重于 Lep d 2 单敏化,结果表明 SM 可能对常年性过敏性哮喘和鼻炎有临床意义,在评估和治疗过敏性呼吸道疾病时应加以考虑。结论。本调查表明,意大利初级保健儿科医生会执行 ARIA 指南,并根据症状强度调整治疗方法。皮质类固醇和抗组胺药是最常见的处方药。鼻腔灌洗也很受欢迎。
Sensitisation to Lep d 2- Lepidoglyphus destructor allergy in asthma and rhinitis.
Summary: Background. Mites are responsible for allergic diseases, such as asthma and rhinitis, in nearly 1.5% of the world population. It is known that nowadays, besides House Dust Mites (HDM), Storage Mites (SM) are important sensitisers in urban non-occupational dwellings, predominantly in the Mediterranean area. The main objective of our study was to analyse the clinical relevance of the most prevalent SM, Lepidoglyphus destructor, by assessing the relationship between sensitisation to the major molecular allergen Lep d 2 and allergic respiratory disease phenotype in an urban population monosensitised to this molecular allergen. Methods. Cross-sectional study which included consecutive patients evaluated in our Allergy Department between 2012 and 2018, from urban non-occupational setting, with rhinitis and/or asthma, perennial symptoms and proven sensitisation to SM Lep d 2, tested using ImmunoCAP Immuno Solid-phase Allergen Chip (ISAC) technology, which detects 112 allergens. Results. A total of 37 allergic patients were included (23 female), aged 20.1 ± 12.8, min-max 5-58 years-old. The molecular sensitisation profile showed 18.9% of L. destructor mite monosensitised patients, having only sIgE to Lep d 2. This subset of patients mainly had allergic rhinitis, with 28.6% also being asthmatic. Regarding severity, most patients showed a persistent moderate phenotype of respiratory disease. The mean value of Lep d 2 sIgE was 8.3 ± 9.8 ISU-E, lower than in mite polysensitised patients (21.7 ± 21.5, p = 0.049). Conclusions. Our proof-of-concept study focused on Lep d 2 monosensitisation, showed that SM may have clinical relevance in perennial allergic asthma and rhinitis, and should be taken into account when assessing and treating allergic respiratory disease. Conclusions. The present survey demonstrated that Italian primary care pediatricians accomplish ARIA guidelines and adapt treatment on the basis of the intensity of symptoms. Corticosteroids and antihistamines are the most common prescribed medications. Nasal lavages are also popular.