使用渗透扩张器和 Foley 球囊导管的门诊宫颈成熟计划评估。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Abbey C Sidebottom, Whitney L Wunderlich, Marc C Vacquier, Kelly A Drake, Mary P Goering, Sandra I Hoffman, David A Watson, Laura C Colicchia
{"title":"使用渗透扩张器和 Foley 球囊导管的门诊宫颈成熟计划评估。","authors":"Abbey C Sidebottom, Whitney L Wunderlich, Marc C Vacquier, Kelly A Drake, Mary P Goering, Sandra I Hoffman, David A Watson, Laura C Colicchia","doi":"10.1055/a-2413-3171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to describe patient characteristics, satisfaction, and outcome measures for patients undergoing outpatient cervical ripening.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> A retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from March 2020 to March 2022 from a large health system. The sample included patients with a low-risk singleton pregnancy undergoing outpatient cervical ripening with either an osmotic dilator or Foley balloon catheter. A subset of patients completed satisfaction surveys. Frequencies and means were used to describe the population and conduct comparisons by device type. Inverse probability of treatment weighted estimates were generated to address baseline differences between patients in the two device groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Outpatient cervical ripening was completed by 120 patients (80 osmotic dilators and 40 Foley balloon catheters). The mean time from insertion to inpatient admission was 16.2 ± 4.8 hours. The mean change in simplified Bishop score (SBS) was 1.8 ± 1.4 and the mean change in dilation was 1.8 ± 1.1 cm. There were no differences in the amount of cervical change by device type. Patients returned earlier than planned 16.7% of the time, primarily for contractions or rupture of membranes. Following outpatient cervical ripening, the time from admission to delivery was 19.9 ± 10.3 hours, with no difference by device type. Vaginal delivery occurred for 74.8% of patients. Patients reported overall satisfaction with the outpatient cervical ripening experience, with the highest satisfaction among those with osmotic dilators. Patients with both device types stated they would recommend outpatient cervical ripening to others, and experienced low levels of stress and discomfort at home prior to hospital admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Patients participating in outpatient cervical ripening with osmotic dilators or Foley balloon catheters experienced clinically meaningful changes in dilation and SBSs while at home and reported general satisfaction with the outpatient program experience.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Outpatient use of osmotic dilators or Foley balloon catheters improved Bishop scores.. · Patient and device complications were comparable to other research findings.. · Patients reported overall satisfaction with outpatient cervical ripening..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of an Outpatient Cervical Ripening Program Using Osmotic Dilators and Foley Balloon Catheters.\",\"authors\":\"Abbey C Sidebottom, Whitney L Wunderlich, Marc C Vacquier, Kelly A Drake, Mary P Goering, Sandra I Hoffman, David A Watson, Laura C Colicchia\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2413-3171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to describe patient characteristics, satisfaction, and outcome measures for patients undergoing outpatient cervical ripening.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> A retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from March 2020 to March 2022 from a large health system. The sample included patients with a low-risk singleton pregnancy undergoing outpatient cervical ripening with either an osmotic dilator or Foley balloon catheter. A subset of patients completed satisfaction surveys. Frequencies and means were used to describe the population and conduct comparisons by device type. Inverse probability of treatment weighted estimates were generated to address baseline differences between patients in the two device groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Outpatient cervical ripening was completed by 120 patients (80 osmotic dilators and 40 Foley balloon catheters). The mean time from insertion to inpatient admission was 16.2 ± 4.8 hours. The mean change in simplified Bishop score (SBS) was 1.8 ± 1.4 and the mean change in dilation was 1.8 ± 1.1 cm. There were no differences in the amount of cervical change by device type. Patients returned earlier than planned 16.7% of the time, primarily for contractions or rupture of membranes. Following outpatient cervical ripening, the time from admission to delivery was 19.9 ± 10.3 hours, with no difference by device type. Vaginal delivery occurred for 74.8% of patients. Patients reported overall satisfaction with the outpatient cervical ripening experience, with the highest satisfaction among those with osmotic dilators. Patients with both device types stated they would recommend outpatient cervical ripening to others, and experienced low levels of stress and discomfort at home prior to hospital admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Patients participating in outpatient cervical ripening with osmotic dilators or Foley balloon catheters experienced clinically meaningful changes in dilation and SBSs while at home and reported general satisfaction with the outpatient program experience.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Outpatient use of osmotic dilators or Foley balloon catheters improved Bishop scores.. · Patient and device complications were comparable to other research findings.. · Patients reported overall satisfaction with outpatient cervical ripening..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2413-3171\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2413-3171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在描述接受门诊宫颈成熟术患者的特征、满意度和结果测量:一项回顾性队列研究,使用了一家大型医疗系统 2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 3 月期间的电子健康记录数据。样本包括在门诊接受宫颈成熟术的低风险单胎妊娠患者,患者可使用渗透扩张器或 Foley 球囊导管。一部分患者完成了满意度调查。使用频率和平均值来描述人群,并按设备类型进行比较。针对两种器械组患者的基线差异,生成了治疗加权反概率估计值:结果:120 名患者完成了门诊宫颈成熟术(80 个渗透扩张器和 40 个 Foley 球囊导管)。从插入到入院的平均时间为 16.2 ± 4.8 小时。简化毕晓普评分(SBS)的平均变化率为 1.8 ± 1.4,扩张的平均变化率为 1.8 ± 1.1 厘米。不同器械类型的宫颈变化量没有差异。有 16.7% 的患者提前返回,主要是因为宫缩或胎膜破裂。门诊宫颈成熟术后,从入院到分娩的时间为(19.9 ± 10.3)小时,设备类型无差异。74.8%的患者经阴道分娩。患者对门诊宫颈成熟术的总体体验表示满意,其中使用渗透扩张器的患者满意度最高。使用两种设备的患者都表示会向他人推荐门诊宫颈成熟术,入院前在家中感受到的压力和不适程度都很低:结论:使用渗透扩张器或 Foley 球囊导管参与门诊宫颈成熟术的患者在家中经历了有临床意义的扩张和 SBS 变化,并对门诊项目体验普遍表示满意:- 门诊使用渗透性扩张器或 Foley 球囊导管改善了 Bishop 评分。- 患者和设备并发症与其他研究结果相当- 患者对门诊宫颈成熟术总体满意
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of an Outpatient Cervical Ripening Program Using Osmotic Dilators and Foley Balloon Catheters.

Objective:  This study aimed to describe patient characteristics, satisfaction, and outcome measures for patients undergoing outpatient cervical ripening.

Study design:  A retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from March 2020 to March 2022 from a large health system. The sample included patients with a low-risk singleton pregnancy undergoing outpatient cervical ripening with either an osmotic dilator or Foley balloon catheter. A subset of patients completed satisfaction surveys. Frequencies and means were used to describe the population and conduct comparisons by device type. Inverse probability of treatment weighted estimates were generated to address baseline differences between patients in the two device groups.

Results:  Outpatient cervical ripening was completed by 120 patients (80 osmotic dilators and 40 Foley balloon catheters). The mean time from insertion to inpatient admission was 16.2 ± 4.8 hours. The mean change in simplified Bishop score (SBS) was 1.8 ± 1.4 and the mean change in dilation was 1.8 ± 1.1 cm. There were no differences in the amount of cervical change by device type. Patients returned earlier than planned 16.7% of the time, primarily for contractions or rupture of membranes. Following outpatient cervical ripening, the time from admission to delivery was 19.9 ± 10.3 hours, with no difference by device type. Vaginal delivery occurred for 74.8% of patients. Patients reported overall satisfaction with the outpatient cervical ripening experience, with the highest satisfaction among those with osmotic dilators. Patients with both device types stated they would recommend outpatient cervical ripening to others, and experienced low levels of stress and discomfort at home prior to hospital admission.

Conclusion:  Patients participating in outpatient cervical ripening with osmotic dilators or Foley balloon catheters experienced clinically meaningful changes in dilation and SBSs while at home and reported general satisfaction with the outpatient program experience.

Key points: · Outpatient use of osmotic dilators or Foley balloon catheters improved Bishop scores.. · Patient and device complications were comparable to other research findings.. · Patients reported overall satisfaction with outpatient cervical ripening..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信