探索麻醉师在实施紧急颈前气道时的认知和情感过程。

IF 0.8 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
L. R. Kidd, P. Wegrzynek, C. Newell, E. Wainwright
{"title":"探索麻醉师在实施紧急颈前气道时的认知和情感过程。","authors":"L. R. Kidd,&nbsp;P. Wegrzynek,&nbsp;C. Newell,&nbsp;E. Wainwright","doi":"10.1002/anr3.12331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Emergency front of neck airway (eFONA) is a potentially lifesaving but very high-stress procedure. We explored the cognitive and affective processes involved via semi-structured interviews with 17 UK anaesthetists who had attempted eFONA within the previous two years. Thematic analyses generated two meta-themes: ‘Making the decision is the hardest part; the doing is easier’ and ‘What helps make the decision?’. We found concerns around scrutiny, lack of a flat hierarchy, unfamiliarity with the situation and the lack of a model for transitioning to eFONA. Culture change, using a shared mental model, priming and emotional disengagement, assisted with eFONA decision-making. Conclusions and implications for practice are presented.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72186,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia reports","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exploration of the cognitive and affective processes for anaesthetists when performing an emergency front of neck airway*\",\"authors\":\"L. R. Kidd,&nbsp;P. Wegrzynek,&nbsp;C. Newell,&nbsp;E. Wainwright\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/anr3.12331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Emergency front of neck airway (eFONA) is a potentially lifesaving but very high-stress procedure. We explored the cognitive and affective processes involved via semi-structured interviews with 17 UK anaesthetists who had attempted eFONA within the previous two years. Thematic analyses generated two meta-themes: ‘Making the decision is the hardest part; the doing is easier’ and ‘What helps make the decision?’. We found concerns around scrutiny, lack of a flat hierarchy, unfamiliarity with the situation and the lack of a model for transitioning to eFONA. Culture change, using a shared mental model, priming and emotional disengagement, assisted with eFONA decision-making. Conclusions and implications for practice are presented.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia reports\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anr3.12331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anr3.12331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

紧急颈前气道(eFONA)是一项可能挽救生命但压力非常大的手术。我们通过对 17 名在过去两年内尝试过 eFONA 的英国麻醉师进行半结构化访谈,探讨了其中涉及的认知和情感过程。主题分析产生了两个元主题:"做出决定是最难的部分;做起来比较容易 "和 "什么有助于做出决定?我们发现了对审查、缺乏扁平化等级制度、不熟悉情况以及缺乏向 eFONA 过渡的模式的担忧。文化变革、共同心智模式、引子和情感脱离有助于 eFONA 决策。本文提出了结论和对实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An exploration of the cognitive and affective processes for anaesthetists when performing an emergency front of neck airway*

Emergency front of neck airway (eFONA) is a potentially lifesaving but very high-stress procedure. We explored the cognitive and affective processes involved via semi-structured interviews with 17 UK anaesthetists who had attempted eFONA within the previous two years. Thematic analyses generated two meta-themes: ‘Making the decision is the hardest part; the doing is easier’ and ‘What helps make the decision?’. We found concerns around scrutiny, lack of a flat hierarchy, unfamiliarity with the situation and the lack of a model for transitioning to eFONA. Culture change, using a shared mental model, priming and emotional disengagement, assisted with eFONA decision-making. Conclusions and implications for practice are presented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信