鼻内侧三叉神经功能评估中侧向任务的标准数据

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Rhinology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.4193/Rhin24.063
Y Mai, A K Hernandez, I Konstantinidis, A Haehner, T Hummel
{"title":"鼻内侧三叉神经功能评估中侧向任务的标准数据","authors":"Y Mai, A K Hernandez, I Konstantinidis, A Haehner, T Hummel","doi":"10.4193/Rhin24.063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To provide normative data for the lateralization task in the assessment of intranasal trigeminal function, as well as to investigate potential effects of age, sex and olfactory function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The lateralization task using eucalyptus as target stimulus was performed to assess intranasal trigeminal function. Data were collected from: 360 healthy adult participants (mean age 37.5 ± 17.4) for the 40-trial version; 284 participants (mean age 32.6 ± 4.1) for the 20-trial version; and 418 participants (mean age 42.6 ± 15.6) for the 10-trial version. The \"Sniffin Sticks\" test was used to measure olfactory function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean scores were 35.46 ± 4.50 for the 40-trial version, 15.64 ± 3.65 for the 20-trial version, and 8.14 ± 2.16 for the 10-trial version. In the reference group aged 18-25 years, the 10th percentiles were 33 for the 40-trial version, 11 for the 20-trial version, and 6 for the 10-trial version. Significant effects of age and odor discrimination score were observed on lateralization performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We provide reference scores for the lateralization task, in large sample of healthy participants. Among the three examined tasks (40, 20 and 10), the 40-trial task yielded the most reliable information. For the 40-trial version, scores equal or higher to 33 points indicate a normal lateralization ability, whereas scores between 27 and 32 may warrant further assessment. Scores below 27 possibly point towards a decreased trigeminal function. The lateralization task serves as surrogate marker of intranasal trigeminal functions and further studies with pathological cases are needed to explore its clinical usefulness.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"92-102"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normative data for the lateralization task in the assessment of intranasal trigeminal function.\",\"authors\":\"Y Mai, A K Hernandez, I Konstantinidis, A Haehner, T Hummel\",\"doi\":\"10.4193/Rhin24.063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To provide normative data for the lateralization task in the assessment of intranasal trigeminal function, as well as to investigate potential effects of age, sex and olfactory function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The lateralization task using eucalyptus as target stimulus was performed to assess intranasal trigeminal function. Data were collected from: 360 healthy adult participants (mean age 37.5 ± 17.4) for the 40-trial version; 284 participants (mean age 32.6 ± 4.1) for the 20-trial version; and 418 participants (mean age 42.6 ± 15.6) for the 10-trial version. The \\\"Sniffin Sticks\\\" test was used to measure olfactory function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean scores were 35.46 ± 4.50 for the 40-trial version, 15.64 ± 3.65 for the 20-trial version, and 8.14 ± 2.16 for the 10-trial version. In the reference group aged 18-25 years, the 10th percentiles were 33 for the 40-trial version, 11 for the 20-trial version, and 6 for the 10-trial version. Significant effects of age and odor discrimination score were observed on lateralization performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We provide reference scores for the lateralization task, in large sample of healthy participants. Among the three examined tasks (40, 20 and 10), the 40-trial task yielded the most reliable information. For the 40-trial version, scores equal or higher to 33 points indicate a normal lateralization ability, whereas scores between 27 and 32 may warrant further assessment. Scores below 27 possibly point towards a decreased trigeminal function. The lateralization task serves as surrogate marker of intranasal trigeminal functions and further studies with pathological cases are needed to explore its clinical usefulness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"92-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin24.063\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin24.063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为评估鼻内三叉神经功能的侧化任务提供标准数据,并研究年龄、性别和嗅觉功能的潜在影响:方法:以桉树为目标刺激物进行侧化任务,以评估鼻内三叉神经功能。收集的数据分别来自:360 名健康成人参与者(平均年龄为 37.5±17.4)进行了 40 次测试;284 名参与者(平均年龄为 32.6±14.1)进行了 20 次测试;418 名参与者(平均年龄为 42.6±15.6)进行了 10 次测试。采用 "嗅觉棒 "测试测量嗅觉功能:40次试验版的平均得分为(35.46±4.50)分,20次试验版的平均得分为(15.64±3.65)分,10次试验版的平均得分为(8.14±2.16)分。在 18-25 岁的参照组中,40 次测试版本的第 10 百分位数为 33,20 次测试版本的第 10 百分位数为 11,10 次测试版本的第 10 百分位数为 6。年龄和气味辨别得分对侧向化成绩有显著影响:我们为大样本健康参与者提供了侧化任务的参考分数。在三项测试任务(40 次、20 次和 10 次)中,40 次测试任务获得的信息最为可靠。对于 40 次试验版本,得分等于或高于 33 分表明侧化能力正常,而得分在 27 分至 32 分之间则需要进一步评估。低于 27 分可能表明三叉神经功能减退。侧化任务可作为三叉神经内功能的替代标记,需要对病理病例进行进一步研究,以探讨其临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Normative data for the lateralization task in the assessment of intranasal trigeminal function.

Aim: To provide normative data for the lateralization task in the assessment of intranasal trigeminal function, as well as to investigate potential effects of age, sex and olfactory function.

Methods: The lateralization task using eucalyptus as target stimulus was performed to assess intranasal trigeminal function. Data were collected from: 360 healthy adult participants (mean age 37.5 ± 17.4) for the 40-trial version; 284 participants (mean age 32.6 ± 4.1) for the 20-trial version; and 418 participants (mean age 42.6 ± 15.6) for the 10-trial version. The "Sniffin Sticks" test was used to measure olfactory function.

Results: The mean scores were 35.46 ± 4.50 for the 40-trial version, 15.64 ± 3.65 for the 20-trial version, and 8.14 ± 2.16 for the 10-trial version. In the reference group aged 18-25 years, the 10th percentiles were 33 for the 40-trial version, 11 for the 20-trial version, and 6 for the 10-trial version. Significant effects of age and odor discrimination score were observed on lateralization performance.

Conclusions: We provide reference scores for the lateralization task, in large sample of healthy participants. Among the three examined tasks (40, 20 and 10), the 40-trial task yielded the most reliable information. For the 40-trial version, scores equal or higher to 33 points indicate a normal lateralization ability, whereas scores between 27 and 32 may warrant further assessment. Scores below 27 possibly point towards a decreased trigeminal function. The lateralization task serves as surrogate marker of intranasal trigeminal functions and further studies with pathological cases are needed to explore its clinical usefulness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信