动机访谈 "和 "信息、动机和行为技能模型 "咨询干预对孕妇分娩方式选择的影响:面对面培训与移动应用程序:随机对照试验

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Obstetrics and Gynecology International Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/3071183
Mahboubeh Shirzad, Elham Shakibazadeh, Payam Sheikhatari, Abbas Rahimi Foroushani, Hamid Poursharifi
{"title":"动机访谈 \"和 \"信息、动机和行为技能模型 \"咨询干预对孕妇分娩方式选择的影响:面对面培训与移动应用程序:随机对照试验","authors":"Mahboubeh Shirzad, Elham Shakibazadeh, Payam Sheikhatari, Abbas Rahimi Foroushani, Hamid Poursharifi","doi":"10.1155/2024/3071183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of counseling interventions, using face-to-face training vs. mobile app for choosing mode of delivery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A four-armed, randomized, controlled parallel-design trial. <i>Setting</i>. Ebnesina Private Hospital in Tehran, Iran. <i>Population</i>. Pregnant women, between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation (<i>n</i> = 120).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant women were randomly assigned in three psycho-educational intervention groups: (1) motivational interviewing via face-to-face training, (2) information, motivation, and behavioral skills model via face-to-face training, (3) the same model via a mobile application, and (4) usual antenatal care (control group). To assess the face-to-face and mobile app training method on women's self-efficacy and intention in choosing a mode of delivery. <i>Main Outcome Measures</i>. Mode of delivery (Cesarean section).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While all three intervention groups showed significant increases in women's self-efficacy and intentions to choose vaginal delivery, the increase was particularly noticeable among those using mobile applications: Before the intervention, self-efficacy and intention Mean ± SD were 77.1 ± 38.6 (CI-95%: [62.72, 91.60]) and 1.10 ± 0.305 (CI-95%: [0.99, 1.21]), respectively. After the intervention, these scores increased to 99.7 ± 30.7 (CI-95%: [88.27, 111.20]) for self-efficacy and 1.70 ± 0.466 (CI-95%: [1.53, 1.87]) for intention. Although 56.7% of women in the intervention groups expressed a preference for vaginal delivery, only 37.5% ultimately pursued this birthing method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brief psycho-educational interventions, particularly technology-driven interventions (mobile apps) can increase the likelihood of women choosing vaginal delivery. To enhance the effectiveness of such interventions, they can be conducted in conjunction with interventions for doctors and healthcare providers. This trial is registered with IRCT20151208025431N7.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of \\\"Motivational Interviewing\\\" and \\\"Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills Model\\\" Counseling Interventions on the Choice of Delivery Mode in Pregnant Women Using Face-to-Face Training vs. Mobile App: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mahboubeh Shirzad, Elham Shakibazadeh, Payam Sheikhatari, Abbas Rahimi Foroushani, Hamid Poursharifi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/3071183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of counseling interventions, using face-to-face training vs. mobile app for choosing mode of delivery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A four-armed, randomized, controlled parallel-design trial. <i>Setting</i>. Ebnesina Private Hospital in Tehran, Iran. <i>Population</i>. Pregnant women, between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation (<i>n</i> = 120).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant women were randomly assigned in three psycho-educational intervention groups: (1) motivational interviewing via face-to-face training, (2) information, motivation, and behavioral skills model via face-to-face training, (3) the same model via a mobile application, and (4) usual antenatal care (control group). To assess the face-to-face and mobile app training method on women's self-efficacy and intention in choosing a mode of delivery. <i>Main Outcome Measures</i>. Mode of delivery (Cesarean section).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While all three intervention groups showed significant increases in women's self-efficacy and intentions to choose vaginal delivery, the increase was particularly noticeable among those using mobile applications: Before the intervention, self-efficacy and intention Mean ± SD were 77.1 ± 38.6 (CI-95%: [62.72, 91.60]) and 1.10 ± 0.305 (CI-95%: [0.99, 1.21]), respectively. After the intervention, these scores increased to 99.7 ± 30.7 (CI-95%: [88.27, 111.20]) for self-efficacy and 1.70 ± 0.466 (CI-95%: [1.53, 1.87]) for intention. Although 56.7% of women in the intervention groups expressed a preference for vaginal delivery, only 37.5% ultimately pursued this birthing method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brief psycho-educational interventions, particularly technology-driven interventions (mobile apps) can increase the likelihood of women choosing vaginal delivery. To enhance the effectiveness of such interventions, they can be conducted in conjunction with interventions for doctors and healthcare providers. This trial is registered with IRCT20151208025431N7.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458305/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3071183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3071183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的调查咨询干预措施的影响,选择面对面培训与手机应用程序的授课方式:设计:四臂随机对照平行设计试验。地点:德黑兰 Ebnesina 私立医院伊朗德黑兰 Ebnesina 私人医院。人群妊娠 24 至 32 周的孕妇(n = 120):孕妇被随机分配到三个心理教育干预组:(1)通过面对面培训进行动机访谈;(2)通过面对面培训进行信息、动机和行为技能模式;(3)通过移动应用程序进行相同模式;(4)常规产前护理(对照组)。评估面对面培训和手机应用培训方法对产妇选择分娩方式的自我效能感和意向的影响。主要结果指标。分娩方式(剖腹产):所有三个干预组的妇女在选择阴道分娩的自我效能感和意向方面都有显著提高,而使用移动应用程序的妇女的提高尤为明显:干预前,自我效能和意向平均值(± SD)分别为 77.1 ± 38.6(CI-95%:[62.72, 91.60])和 1.10 ± 0.305(CI-95%:[0.99, 1.21])。干预后,自我效能感得分增至 99.7 ± 30.7 (CI-95%: [88.27, 111.20]),意向得分增至 1.70 ± 0.466 (CI-95%: [1.53, 1.87])。虽然干预组中有 56.7% 的妇女表示倾向于阴道分娩,但只有 37.5% 的妇女最终选择了这种分娩方式:结论:简短的心理教育干预,尤其是技术驱动的干预(手机应用)可以增加产妇选择阴道分娩的可能性。为提高此类干预措施的效果,可将其与针对医生和医疗服务提供者的干预措施结合起来进行。本试验已注册为 IRCT20151208025431N7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of "Motivational Interviewing" and "Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills Model" Counseling Interventions on the Choice of Delivery Mode in Pregnant Women Using Face-to-Face Training vs. Mobile App: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: To investigate the impact of counseling interventions, using face-to-face training vs. mobile app for choosing mode of delivery.

Design: A four-armed, randomized, controlled parallel-design trial. Setting. Ebnesina Private Hospital in Tehran, Iran. Population. Pregnant women, between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation (n = 120).

Methods: Pregnant women were randomly assigned in three psycho-educational intervention groups: (1) motivational interviewing via face-to-face training, (2) information, motivation, and behavioral skills model via face-to-face training, (3) the same model via a mobile application, and (4) usual antenatal care (control group). To assess the face-to-face and mobile app training method on women's self-efficacy and intention in choosing a mode of delivery. Main Outcome Measures. Mode of delivery (Cesarean section).

Results: While all three intervention groups showed significant increases in women's self-efficacy and intentions to choose vaginal delivery, the increase was particularly noticeable among those using mobile applications: Before the intervention, self-efficacy and intention Mean ± SD were 77.1 ± 38.6 (CI-95%: [62.72, 91.60]) and 1.10 ± 0.305 (CI-95%: [0.99, 1.21]), respectively. After the intervention, these scores increased to 99.7 ± 30.7 (CI-95%: [88.27, 111.20]) for self-efficacy and 1.70 ± 0.466 (CI-95%: [1.53, 1.87]) for intention. Although 56.7% of women in the intervention groups expressed a preference for vaginal delivery, only 37.5% ultimately pursued this birthing method.

Conclusions: Brief psycho-educational interventions, particularly technology-driven interventions (mobile apps) can increase the likelihood of women choosing vaginal delivery. To enhance the effectiveness of such interventions, they can be conducted in conjunction with interventions for doctors and healthcare providers. This trial is registered with IRCT20151208025431N7.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Obstetrics and Gynecology International OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Obstetrics and Gynecology International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a forum for scientists and clinical professionals working in obstetrics and gynecology. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine and infertility, reproductive endocrinology, and sexual medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信