FOCUS-PDCA 对降低经桡动脉介入术后并发症发生率的影响。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tong Zhou, Jing Liu, Shuangshuang Wang, Qian Zhang
{"title":"FOCUS-PDCA 对降低经桡动脉介入术后并发症发生率的影响。","authors":"Tong Zhou, Jing Liu, Shuangshuang Wang, Qian Zhang","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06544-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the find, organize, clarify, understand, select-plan, do, check, act (FOCUS-PDCA) procedure on reducing the incidence of complications at the puncture site.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent the transradial interventional therapy (TRI) were divided into control (N.=160) and FOCUS-PDCA (N.=158) groups. The postoperative complications at the puncture site was observed in the two groups, and the pain, bleeding, swelling and comfort of the two groups were compared and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hours after surgery, the number of pain-free patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (62.1% vs. 44.4%, P=0.014). The degree of swelling at 6 and 2 hours after TRI in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group (-0.08±0.23 vs. -0.00±0.17, P=0.001). No early radial artery occlusion was found in either group. The postoperative comfort score in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group (101.94±9.99 vs. 91.14±14.50, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FOCUS-PDCA approach may reduce the incidence of early pain and long-term swelling after TRI, improve patient comfort, and enhance the quality of specialist care. The results suggested that FOCUS-PDCA had the value of popularization and application.</p>","PeriodicalId":18668,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of FOCUS-PDCA on reducing the incidence of complications after transradial intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Tong Zhou, Jing Liu, Shuangshuang Wang, Qian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06544-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the find, organize, clarify, understand, select-plan, do, check, act (FOCUS-PDCA) procedure on reducing the incidence of complications at the puncture site.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent the transradial interventional therapy (TRI) were divided into control (N.=160) and FOCUS-PDCA (N.=158) groups. The postoperative complications at the puncture site was observed in the two groups, and the pain, bleeding, swelling and comfort of the two groups were compared and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hours after surgery, the number of pain-free patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (62.1% vs. 44.4%, P=0.014). The degree of swelling at 6 and 2 hours after TRI in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group (-0.08±0.23 vs. -0.00±0.17, P=0.001). No early radial artery occlusion was found in either group. The postoperative comfort score in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group (101.94±9.99 vs. 91.14±14.50, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FOCUS-PDCA approach may reduce the incidence of early pain and long-term swelling after TRI, improve patient comfort, and enhance the quality of specialist care. The results suggested that FOCUS-PDCA had the value of popularization and application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva cardiology and angiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva cardiology and angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06544-X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06544-X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估发现、组织、澄清、理解、选择-计划、执行、检查、行动(FOCUS-PDCA)程序对降低穿刺部位并发症发生率的影响:方法:将接受经桡动脉介入治疗(TRI)的患者分为对照组(160 人)和 FOCUS-PDCA 组(158 人)。观察两组患者术后穿刺部位的并发症情况,并对两组患者的疼痛、出血、肿胀和舒适度进行比较和分析:术后两小时,观察组患者无痛人数明显高于对照组(62.1% 对 44.4%,P=0.014)。观察组在 TRI 术后 6 小时和 2 小时的肿胀程度明显低于对照组(-0.08±0.23 vs. -0.00±0.17,P=0.001)。两组均未发现早期桡动脉闭塞。观察组术后舒适度评分明显高于对照组(101.94±9.99 vs. 91.14±14.50,P=0.001):FOCUS-PDCA方法可降低TRI术后早期疼痛和长期肿胀的发生率,改善患者舒适度,提高专科护理质量。结果表明,FOCUS-PDCA 具有推广和应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of FOCUS-PDCA on reducing the incidence of complications after transradial intervention.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the find, organize, clarify, understand, select-plan, do, check, act (FOCUS-PDCA) procedure on reducing the incidence of complications at the puncture site.

Methods: Patients who underwent the transradial interventional therapy (TRI) were divided into control (N.=160) and FOCUS-PDCA (N.=158) groups. The postoperative complications at the puncture site was observed in the two groups, and the pain, bleeding, swelling and comfort of the two groups were compared and analyzed.

Results: Two hours after surgery, the number of pain-free patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (62.1% vs. 44.4%, P=0.014). The degree of swelling at 6 and 2 hours after TRI in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group (-0.08±0.23 vs. -0.00±0.17, P=0.001). No early radial artery occlusion was found in either group. The postoperative comfort score in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group (101.94±9.99 vs. 91.14±14.50, P<0.001).

Conclusions: The FOCUS-PDCA approach may reduce the incidence of early pain and long-term swelling after TRI, improve patient comfort, and enhance the quality of specialist care. The results suggested that FOCUS-PDCA had the value of popularization and application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva cardiology and angiology
Minerva cardiology and angiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信