Patrick Greiffenstein, Alexander Cavalea, Alison Smith, Thomas Sharp, Olivia Warren, Jenna Dennis, Mary C Gatterer, Denise Danos, Terrence C Byrne, Amy Scarborough, Paige Deville, Keith VanMeter
{"title":"心肺复苏对猪严重失血性休克模型灌注的影响。","authors":"Patrick Greiffenstein, Alexander Cavalea, Alison Smith, Thomas Sharp, Olivia Warren, Jenna Dennis, Mary C Gatterer, Denise Danos, Terrence C Byrne, Amy Scarborough, Paige Deville, Keith VanMeter","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulseless electrical activity from hemorrhagic shock has not been shown to benefit from cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Using a porcine model, our objective was to determine the effects of CPR on brain and skin oxygenation as a measure of perfusion in the setting of severe hemorrhagic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult swine randomized to non-CPR and CPR were anesthetized. Tissue oxygen sensors were inserted into the parietal cerebral parenchyma and skin. Controlled hemorrhagic shock with mean arterial pressure (MAP) <30 mm Hg was achieved and allowed to persist for 10 minutes. Animals were randomized to either receive automated CPR or no treatment. They were then autotransfused with sufficient blood to achieve MAP >60 mm Hg. Measurements were obtained before, during, and after shock state. Outcomes were modeled using mixed-effects lognormal models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 swine were used, and the results were analyzed (non-CPR, n = 5; CPR, n = 7). One animal in the CPR group died during shock. One cerebral probe sensor malfunctioned, and these data were excluded. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. MAP during shock was similar between groups; however, the CPR group had significantly higher systolic blood pressure (62.8 vs. 48.8 mm Hg, p = 0.010) and lower diastolic blood pressure (12.8 vs. 27.8 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Both cerebral (pBO 2 ) and skin oxygenation (TcO 2 ) dropped significantly as a result of shock. The CPR group had lower overall measures of tissue perfusion during shock, but only TcO 2 at the shoulder was significantly lower during shock (11.5 vs. 21.1 mm Hg, p = 0.027) and recovery (33.3 vs. 62 mm Hg, p = 0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our model showed that adding CPR during hemorrhagic shock did not improve end-organ oxygenation/perfusion, but did significantly diminish skin perfusion. This experiment corroborates existing literature on the potential detrimental effects of CPR during hemorrhagic pulseless electrical activity, but further work is needed to confirm this observation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"251-257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on perfusion in a porcine model of severe hemorrhagic shock.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Greiffenstein, Alexander Cavalea, Alison Smith, Thomas Sharp, Olivia Warren, Jenna Dennis, Mary C Gatterer, Denise Danos, Terrence C Byrne, Amy Scarborough, Paige Deville, Keith VanMeter\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TA.0000000000004437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulseless electrical activity from hemorrhagic shock has not been shown to benefit from cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Using a porcine model, our objective was to determine the effects of CPR on brain and skin oxygenation as a measure of perfusion in the setting of severe hemorrhagic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult swine randomized to non-CPR and CPR were anesthetized. Tissue oxygen sensors were inserted into the parietal cerebral parenchyma and skin. Controlled hemorrhagic shock with mean arterial pressure (MAP) <30 mm Hg was achieved and allowed to persist for 10 minutes. Animals were randomized to either receive automated CPR or no treatment. They were then autotransfused with sufficient blood to achieve MAP >60 mm Hg. Measurements were obtained before, during, and after shock state. Outcomes were modeled using mixed-effects lognormal models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 swine were used, and the results were analyzed (non-CPR, n = 5; CPR, n = 7). One animal in the CPR group died during shock. One cerebral probe sensor malfunctioned, and these data were excluded. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. MAP during shock was similar between groups; however, the CPR group had significantly higher systolic blood pressure (62.8 vs. 48.8 mm Hg, p = 0.010) and lower diastolic blood pressure (12.8 vs. 27.8 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Both cerebral (pBO 2 ) and skin oxygenation (TcO 2 ) dropped significantly as a result of shock. The CPR group had lower overall measures of tissue perfusion during shock, but only TcO 2 at the shoulder was significantly lower during shock (11.5 vs. 21.1 mm Hg, p = 0.027) and recovery (33.3 vs. 62 mm Hg, p = 0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our model showed that adding CPR during hemorrhagic shock did not improve end-organ oxygenation/perfusion, but did significantly diminish skin perfusion. This experiment corroborates existing literature on the potential detrimental effects of CPR during hemorrhagic pulseless electrical activity, but further work is needed to confirm this observation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"251-257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004437\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004437","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:失血性休克引起的无脉搏电活动尚未证明能从心肺复苏(CPR)中获益。我们使用猪模型的目的是确定心肺复苏对大脑和皮肤氧合的影响,以此衡量严重失血性休克时的灌注情况:方法:对随机接受非心肺复苏和心肺复苏的成年猪进行麻醉。将组织氧传感器插入顶叶脑实质和皮肤。控制失血性休克,平均动脉压 (MAP) 为 60 毫米汞柱。在休克状态之前、期间和之后进行测量。结果采用混合效应对数正态模型进行建模:共使用了 12 头猪,并对结果进行了分析(非心肺复苏,n = 5;心肺复苏,n = 7)。心肺复苏组有一头猪在休克期间死亡。一个大脑探头传感器发生故障,这些数据被排除在外。各组的基线特征相似。两组休克时的血压相似,但心肺复苏组的收缩压明显更高(62.8 vs. 48.8 mm Hg,p = 0.010),舒张压更低(12.8 vs. 27.8 mm Hg,p < 0.001)。休克导致脑氧合(pBO2)和皮肤氧合(TcO2)显著下降。心肺复苏组在休克期间的总体组织灌注量较低,但只有肩部的TcO2在休克期间(11.5 vs. 21.1 mm Hg,p = 0.027)和恢复期间(33.3 vs. 62 mm Hg,p = 0.033)显著降低:我们的模型显示,在失血性休克期间增加心肺复苏并不能改善终末器官的氧合/灌注,但会显著降低皮肤灌注。该实验证实了现有文献中关于失血性休克无脉搏电活动时心肺复苏的潜在不利影响,但还需要进一步的工作来证实这一观察结果。
Effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on perfusion in a porcine model of severe hemorrhagic shock.
Background: Pulseless electrical activity from hemorrhagic shock has not been shown to benefit from cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Using a porcine model, our objective was to determine the effects of CPR on brain and skin oxygenation as a measure of perfusion in the setting of severe hemorrhagic shock.
Methods: Adult swine randomized to non-CPR and CPR were anesthetized. Tissue oxygen sensors were inserted into the parietal cerebral parenchyma and skin. Controlled hemorrhagic shock with mean arterial pressure (MAP) <30 mm Hg was achieved and allowed to persist for 10 minutes. Animals were randomized to either receive automated CPR or no treatment. They were then autotransfused with sufficient blood to achieve MAP >60 mm Hg. Measurements were obtained before, during, and after shock state. Outcomes were modeled using mixed-effects lognormal models.
Results: A total of 12 swine were used, and the results were analyzed (non-CPR, n = 5; CPR, n = 7). One animal in the CPR group died during shock. One cerebral probe sensor malfunctioned, and these data were excluded. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. MAP during shock was similar between groups; however, the CPR group had significantly higher systolic blood pressure (62.8 vs. 48.8 mm Hg, p = 0.010) and lower diastolic blood pressure (12.8 vs. 27.8 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Both cerebral (pBO 2 ) and skin oxygenation (TcO 2 ) dropped significantly as a result of shock. The CPR group had lower overall measures of tissue perfusion during shock, but only TcO 2 at the shoulder was significantly lower during shock (11.5 vs. 21.1 mm Hg, p = 0.027) and recovery (33.3 vs. 62 mm Hg, p = 0.033).
Conclusion: Our model showed that adding CPR during hemorrhagic shock did not improve end-organ oxygenation/perfusion, but did significantly diminish skin perfusion. This experiment corroborates existing literature on the potential detrimental effects of CPR during hemorrhagic pulseless electrical activity, but further work is needed to confirm this observation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.