街头儿童和童工的健康和权利:范围界定审查。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Eva Jörgensen, Sharanya Napier-Raman, Shona Macleod, Rajeev Seth, Michael Goodman, Neil Howard, Jónína Einarsdóttir, Meghendra Banerjee, Shanti Raman
{"title":"街头儿童和童工的健康和权利:范围界定审查。","authors":"Eva Jörgensen, Sharanya Napier-Raman, Shona Macleod, Rajeev Seth, Michael Goodman, Neil Howard, Jónína Einarsdóttir, Meghendra Banerjee, Shanti Raman","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Street and working children (SWC) and young people (YP) are highly vulnerable to violence, exploitation, hazardous environments and human rights violations. While the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and the International Labour Organisation provide some guidance, there is limited information on their right to healthcare. This study aims to identify enablers and barriers to healthcare access for SWC and document associated rights violations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2000 to the present, we conducted systematic searches for SWC (0-18 years) in databases including MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EBSCO, PUBMED and PROQUEST, using broad search terms related to street children, working children, healthcare access and rights. The searches were supplemented by grey literature and hand searches. Two independent reviewers finalised the included studies, and data were analysed using a rights-based framework with narrative analysis and thematisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search yielded 7346 articles (5972 for street children and 1374 for working children), with 35 studies (18 for street children and 17 for working children) included in the review. Most studies on working children (13/17) focused on trafficking/commercial exploitation. Studies were predominantly from Africa, followed by the USA, Asia, the UK and Canada, with only two employing a rights framework. SWC face barriers such as cost, distance, visibility/accessibility of services, stigma, seclusion, threats of violence, lack of legal documents, crisis-oriented healthcare use and self-medication. Enablers included agency, self-efficacy, positive relationships with adults and proactive healthcare use when accessible. Emergency departments are frequently accessed by SWC, indicating a need for healthcare professionals to be trained and sensitised. Holistic and comprehensive healthcare is essential.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant research gaps exist, with many SWC populations under-represented. SWC share healthcare access barriers with other marginalised groups. Healthcare for SWC must be tailored to their unique needs and strengths and be holistic and trauma-informed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to health and rights of children in street situations and working children: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Eva Jörgensen, Sharanya Napier-Raman, Shona Macleod, Rajeev Seth, Michael Goodman, Neil Howard, Jónína Einarsdóttir, Meghendra Banerjee, Shanti Raman\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Street and working children (SWC) and young people (YP) are highly vulnerable to violence, exploitation, hazardous environments and human rights violations. While the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and the International Labour Organisation provide some guidance, there is limited information on their right to healthcare. This study aims to identify enablers and barriers to healthcare access for SWC and document associated rights violations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2000 to the present, we conducted systematic searches for SWC (0-18 years) in databases including MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EBSCO, PUBMED and PROQUEST, using broad search terms related to street children, working children, healthcare access and rights. The searches were supplemented by grey literature and hand searches. Two independent reviewers finalised the included studies, and data were analysed using a rights-based framework with narrative analysis and thematisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search yielded 7346 articles (5972 for street children and 1374 for working children), with 35 studies (18 for street children and 17 for working children) included in the review. Most studies on working children (13/17) focused on trafficking/commercial exploitation. Studies were predominantly from Africa, followed by the USA, Asia, the UK and Canada, with only two employing a rights framework. SWC face barriers such as cost, distance, visibility/accessibility of services, stigma, seclusion, threats of violence, lack of legal documents, crisis-oriented healthcare use and self-medication. Enablers included agency, self-efficacy, positive relationships with adults and proactive healthcare use when accessible. Emergency departments are frequently accessed by SWC, indicating a need for healthcare professionals to be trained and sensitised. Holistic and comprehensive healthcare is essential.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant research gaps exist, with many SWC populations under-represented. SWC share healthcare access barriers with other marginalised groups. Healthcare for SWC must be tailored to their unique needs and strengths and be holistic and trauma-informed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474684/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002870\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002870","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:街头儿童和童工(SWC)以及青少年(YP)极易遭受暴力、剥削、危险环境和人权侵犯。虽然联合国儿童权利委员会和国际劳工组织提供了一些指导,但有关他们医疗保健权利的信息却很有限。本研究旨在确定小童和妇女获得医疗保健的促进因素和障碍,并记录相关的侵权行为:从 2000 年至今,我们在包括 MEDLINE、PsycINFO、EBSCO、PUBMED 和 PROQUEST 在内的数据库中,使用与街头儿童、童工、医疗保健机会和权利相关的广泛搜索条件,对小童和妇女(0-18 岁)进行了系统搜索。灰色文献和手工检索对检索进行了补充。两位独立审稿人对纳入的研究进行了最终审定,并采用基于权利的框架对数据进行了叙事分析和专题分析:初步检索共获得 7346 篇文章(其中 5972 篇涉及流浪儿童,1374 篇涉及童工),35 项研究(其中 18 项涉及流浪儿童,17 项涉及童工)被纳入审查范围。大多数关于童工的研究(13/17)侧重于贩运/商业剥削。研究主要来自非洲,其次是美国、亚洲、英国和加拿大,只有两项研究采用了权利框架。童工面临的障碍包括费用、距离、服务的可见度/可及性、污名化、隔离、暴力威胁、缺乏法律文件、以危机为导向的医疗保健使用和自我药物治疗。促进因素包括代理、自我效能感、与成年人的积极关系以及在可获得医疗服务时积极主动地使用医疗服务。急诊室是社会福利中心的常客,这表明需要对医疗保健专业人员进行培训,提高他们的认识。综合全面的医疗保健至关重要:结论:研究方面存在巨大差距,许多社会福利中心的人群代表性不足。社会福利中心与其他边缘化群体一样,在获得医疗保健服务方面存在障碍。必须根据他们的独特需求和优势,为他们提供全面的、以创伤为基础的医疗保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Access to health and rights of children in street situations and working children: a scoping review.

Background: Street and working children (SWC) and young people (YP) are highly vulnerable to violence, exploitation, hazardous environments and human rights violations. While the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and the International Labour Organisation provide some guidance, there is limited information on their right to healthcare. This study aims to identify enablers and barriers to healthcare access for SWC and document associated rights violations.

Methods: From 2000 to the present, we conducted systematic searches for SWC (0-18 years) in databases including MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EBSCO, PUBMED and PROQUEST, using broad search terms related to street children, working children, healthcare access and rights. The searches were supplemented by grey literature and hand searches. Two independent reviewers finalised the included studies, and data were analysed using a rights-based framework with narrative analysis and thematisation.

Results: The initial search yielded 7346 articles (5972 for street children and 1374 for working children), with 35 studies (18 for street children and 17 for working children) included in the review. Most studies on working children (13/17) focused on trafficking/commercial exploitation. Studies were predominantly from Africa, followed by the USA, Asia, the UK and Canada, with only two employing a rights framework. SWC face barriers such as cost, distance, visibility/accessibility of services, stigma, seclusion, threats of violence, lack of legal documents, crisis-oriented healthcare use and self-medication. Enablers included agency, self-efficacy, positive relationships with adults and proactive healthcare use when accessible. Emergency departments are frequently accessed by SWC, indicating a need for healthcare professionals to be trained and sensitised. Holistic and comprehensive healthcare is essential.

Conclusion: Significant research gaps exist, with many SWC populations under-represented. SWC share healthcare access barriers with other marginalised groups. Healthcare for SWC must be tailored to their unique needs and strengths and be holistic and trauma-informed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信