DSM-5强迫症及相关障碍(OCRDs)中的普遍人格维度和功能障碍强迫观念。

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Diana M Lisi, Chelsea Wood-Ross, Rotem Regev, Judith M Laposa, Neil A Rector
{"title":"DSM-5强迫症及相关障碍(OCRDs)中的普遍人格维度和功能障碍强迫观念。","authors":"Diana M Lisi, Chelsea Wood-Ross, Rotem Regev, Judith M Laposa, Neil A Rector","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2024.2408381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to determine the extent to which personality and cognitive factors contribute to the identification of shared associations between the DSM-5's OCD and Related Disorders (OCRDs). Participants (<i>n</i> = 239) were treatment-seeking outpatients with a principal diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), hoarding disorder (HD), trichotillomania (TTM), or excoriation disorder (EXC), as compared to healthy community controls (<i>n =</i> 100). Analyses examined the relationships between diagnostic group, personality dimensions, and obsessive beliefs. Results demonstrated that compared to non-clinical controls, all diagnostic groups scored significantly higher on neuroticism and lower on extraversion and conscientiousness. Few significant differences were found across diagnostic groups: extraversion was higher in the TTM group (vs. all OCRDs), conscientiousness was lower in the HD group (vs. OCD, TTM, EXC), and openness to experience was higher in the TTM and EXC groups (vs. OCD, HD). Obsessional beliefs were significantly elevated in all clinical conditions (vs. controls) except for beliefs surrounding responsibility and threat estimation, which were only significantly higher in OCD and BDD groups. These results highlight shared personality and cognitive vulnerability in the OCRDs as well as unique disorder-specific vulnerabilities related to OCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Universal personality dimensions and dysfunctional obsessional beliefs in the DSM-5's OCD and related disorders (OCRDs).\",\"authors\":\"Diana M Lisi, Chelsea Wood-Ross, Rotem Regev, Judith M Laposa, Neil A Rector\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16506073.2024.2408381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to determine the extent to which personality and cognitive factors contribute to the identification of shared associations between the DSM-5's OCD and Related Disorders (OCRDs). Participants (<i>n</i> = 239) were treatment-seeking outpatients with a principal diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), hoarding disorder (HD), trichotillomania (TTM), or excoriation disorder (EXC), as compared to healthy community controls (<i>n =</i> 100). Analyses examined the relationships between diagnostic group, personality dimensions, and obsessive beliefs. Results demonstrated that compared to non-clinical controls, all diagnostic groups scored significantly higher on neuroticism and lower on extraversion and conscientiousness. Few significant differences were found across diagnostic groups: extraversion was higher in the TTM group (vs. all OCRDs), conscientiousness was lower in the HD group (vs. OCD, TTM, EXC), and openness to experience was higher in the TTM and EXC groups (vs. OCD, HD). Obsessional beliefs were significantly elevated in all clinical conditions (vs. controls) except for beliefs surrounding responsibility and threat estimation, which were only significantly higher in OCD and BDD groups. These results highlight shared personality and cognitive vulnerability in the OCRDs as well as unique disorder-specific vulnerabilities related to OCD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":4,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2024.2408381\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2024.2408381","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定人格和认知因素在多大程度上有助于识别 DSM-5 强迫症及相关障碍(OCRD)之间的共同关联。研究对象(n = 239)是主要诊断为强迫症(OCD)、躯体畸形障碍(BDD)、囤积障碍(HD)、嗜毛症(TTM)或排泄障碍(EXC)的寻求治疗的门诊患者,以及健康的社区对照组(n = 100)。研究分析了诊断组别、人格维度和强迫观念之间的关系。结果表明,与非临床对照组相比,所有诊断组在神经质方面的得分都明显较高,而在外向性和自觉性方面的得分则明显较低。各诊断组之间几乎没有发现明显的差异:TTM 组的外向性较高(与所有 OCRD 相比),HD 组的自觉性较低(与 OCD、TTM、EXC 相比),TTM 和 EXC 组的经验开放性较高(与 OCD、HD 相比)。所有临床症状(与对照组相比)中的强迫观念都明显增强,但与责任和威胁估计有关的观念除外,只有强迫症和 BDD 组的强迫观念明显增强。这些结果突显了 OCRDs 共同的人格和认知脆弱性,以及与强迫症相关的独特的特定障碍脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Universal personality dimensions and dysfunctional obsessional beliefs in the DSM-5's OCD and related disorders (OCRDs).

This study aimed to determine the extent to which personality and cognitive factors contribute to the identification of shared associations between the DSM-5's OCD and Related Disorders (OCRDs). Participants (n = 239) were treatment-seeking outpatients with a principal diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), hoarding disorder (HD), trichotillomania (TTM), or excoriation disorder (EXC), as compared to healthy community controls (n = 100). Analyses examined the relationships between diagnostic group, personality dimensions, and obsessive beliefs. Results demonstrated that compared to non-clinical controls, all diagnostic groups scored significantly higher on neuroticism and lower on extraversion and conscientiousness. Few significant differences were found across diagnostic groups: extraversion was higher in the TTM group (vs. all OCRDs), conscientiousness was lower in the HD group (vs. OCD, TTM, EXC), and openness to experience was higher in the TTM and EXC groups (vs. OCD, HD). Obsessional beliefs were significantly elevated in all clinical conditions (vs. controls) except for beliefs surrounding responsibility and threat estimation, which were only significantly higher in OCD and BDD groups. These results highlight shared personality and cognitive vulnerability in the OCRDs as well as unique disorder-specific vulnerabilities related to OCD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信