机器人胸腔手术和视频辅助胸腔手术患者的漏气发生率。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Harushi Ueno, Yuri Takada, Yoshito Imamura, Shoji Okado, Yuji Nomata, Hiroki Watanabe, Keita Nakanishi, Yuka Kadomatsu, Taketo Kato, Shota Nakamura, Tetsuya Mizuno, Toyofumi Fengshi Chen-Yoshikawa
{"title":"机器人胸腔手术和视频辅助胸腔手术患者的漏气发生率。","authors":"Harushi Ueno, Yuri Takada, Yoshito Imamura, Shoji Okado, Yuji Nomata, Hiroki Watanabe, Keita Nakanishi, Yuka Kadomatsu, Taketo Kato, Shota Nakamura, Tetsuya Mizuno, Toyofumi Fengshi Chen-Yoshikawa","doi":"10.18999/nagjms.86.3.464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative air leakage is the most common complication in surgery for malignant lung tumors, leading to extended hospital stays and substantial medical expenses. This study aimed to identify the incidence and characteristics of intraoperative and postoperative air leaks in both robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), as well as the causes of persistent air leakage following RATS. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent lung resection for malignant lung tumors at our institution from October 2018 to August 2022. We compared the incidence rates of intraoperative air leak, postoperative air leak, and persistent air leak between patients who underwent RATS and those who underwent VATS. Background factors were adjusted using propensity score matching. A subanalysis was performed to compare unexpected air leaks, defined as air leaks not observed intraoperatively but confirmed postoperatively. The study included 295 cases of RATS and 227 cases of VATS. In both the overall population and the matched group (187 cases each for RATS and VATS), RATS demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of persistent air leaks compared to VATS (11% vs 3%, p < 0.01; 9% vs 3%, p = 0.02, respectively). RATS also had a significantly higher incidence of unexpected air leaks compared with VATS (29% vs 18%, p = 0.05). Although there was no statistically significant difference in hospital stays, RATS showed a higher incidence of postoperative persistent air leaks and unexpected postoperative air leaks than VATS.</p>","PeriodicalId":49014,"journal":{"name":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","volume":"86 3","pages":"464-471"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of air leaks in patients undergoing robotic thoracic surgery and video-assisted thoracic surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Harushi Ueno, Yuri Takada, Yoshito Imamura, Shoji Okado, Yuji Nomata, Hiroki Watanabe, Keita Nakanishi, Yuka Kadomatsu, Taketo Kato, Shota Nakamura, Tetsuya Mizuno, Toyofumi Fengshi Chen-Yoshikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.18999/nagjms.86.3.464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Postoperative air leakage is the most common complication in surgery for malignant lung tumors, leading to extended hospital stays and substantial medical expenses. This study aimed to identify the incidence and characteristics of intraoperative and postoperative air leaks in both robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), as well as the causes of persistent air leakage following RATS. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent lung resection for malignant lung tumors at our institution from October 2018 to August 2022. We compared the incidence rates of intraoperative air leak, postoperative air leak, and persistent air leak between patients who underwent RATS and those who underwent VATS. Background factors were adjusted using propensity score matching. A subanalysis was performed to compare unexpected air leaks, defined as air leaks not observed intraoperatively but confirmed postoperatively. The study included 295 cases of RATS and 227 cases of VATS. In both the overall population and the matched group (187 cases each for RATS and VATS), RATS demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of persistent air leaks compared to VATS (11% vs 3%, p < 0.01; 9% vs 3%, p = 0.02, respectively). RATS also had a significantly higher incidence of unexpected air leaks compared with VATS (29% vs 18%, p = 0.05). Although there was no statistically significant difference in hospital stays, RATS showed a higher incidence of postoperative persistent air leaks and unexpected postoperative air leaks than VATS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"86 3\",\"pages\":\"464-471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439599/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.86.3.464\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.86.3.464","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

术后漏气是肺部恶性肿瘤手术中最常见的并发症,会导致住院时间延长和巨额医疗费用。本研究旨在确定机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS)和视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)术中和术后漏气的发生率和特点,以及 RATS 术后持续漏气的原因。我们对 2018 年 10 月至 2022 年 8 月期间在我院接受肺部恶性肿瘤切除术的患者进行了回顾性分析。我们比较了接受 RATS 和接受 VATS 的患者术中漏气、术后漏气和持续漏气的发生率。使用倾向评分匹配法调整了背景因素。还进行了一项子分析来比较意外漏气,意外漏气的定义是术中未观察到但术后证实的漏气。研究包括 295 例 RATS 和 227 例 VATS。在总体人群和匹配组(RATS 和 VATS 各 187 例)中,RATS 与 VATS 相比,持续性气漏的发生率明显更高(分别为 11% vs 3%,p < 0.01;9% vs 3%,p = 0.02)。与 VATS 相比,RATS 的意外气漏发生率也明显更高(29% vs 18%,p = 0.05)。虽然在住院时间上没有统计学意义上的显著差异,但 RATS 术后持续漏气和术后意外漏气的发生率高于 VATS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence of air leaks in patients undergoing robotic thoracic surgery and video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Postoperative air leakage is the most common complication in surgery for malignant lung tumors, leading to extended hospital stays and substantial medical expenses. This study aimed to identify the incidence and characteristics of intraoperative and postoperative air leaks in both robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), as well as the causes of persistent air leakage following RATS. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent lung resection for malignant lung tumors at our institution from October 2018 to August 2022. We compared the incidence rates of intraoperative air leak, postoperative air leak, and persistent air leak between patients who underwent RATS and those who underwent VATS. Background factors were adjusted using propensity score matching. A subanalysis was performed to compare unexpected air leaks, defined as air leaks not observed intraoperatively but confirmed postoperatively. The study included 295 cases of RATS and 227 cases of VATS. In both the overall population and the matched group (187 cases each for RATS and VATS), RATS demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of persistent air leaks compared to VATS (11% vs 3%, p < 0.01; 9% vs 3%, p = 0.02, respectively). RATS also had a significantly higher incidence of unexpected air leaks compared with VATS (29% vs 18%, p = 0.05). Although there was no statistically significant difference in hospital stays, RATS showed a higher incidence of postoperative persistent air leaks and unexpected postoperative air leaks than VATS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original papers in the areas of medical science and its related fields. Reviews, symposium reports, short communications, notes, case reports, hypothesis papers, medical image at a glance, video and announcements are also accepted. Manuscripts should be in English. It is recommended that an English check of the manuscript by a competent and knowledgeable native speaker be completed before submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信