瑞典全国阴茎癌登记数据质量评估。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Åsa Warnolf, Dominik Glombik, Fredrik Sandin, Mats Lambe, Gediminas Baseckas, Axel Gerdtsson, Kimia Kohestani, Peter Kirrander
{"title":"瑞典全国阴茎癌登记数据质量评估。","authors":"Åsa Warnolf, Dominik Glombik, Fredrik Sandin, Mats Lambe, Gediminas Baseckas, Axel Gerdtsson, Kimia Kohestani, Peter Kirrander","doi":"10.2340/sju.v59.42029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The National Penile Cancer Register (NPECR) in Sweden was initiated in year 2000 and currently contains more than 3,900 men diagnosed with penile cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate data quality in the NPECR in terms of completeness, timeliness, comparability, and validity.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Completeness was assessed by cross-linkage to the Swedish Cancer Register. Timeliness, defined as time from date of diagnosis to date of reporting in the NPECR, was calculated. Comparability was evaluated by reviewing and comparing coding routines in the NPECR with national and international guidelines. To assess validity, medical records of 375 men with a penile cancer diagnosis in the NPECR between 2017 and 2020 were reviewed and selected variables were re-abstracted and compared with previously registered data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Completeness was high (93%). Timeliness was in median 4.6 (Inter Quartile Range 2.6-8.8) months. Comparability was good with coding routines and the registration forms were in compliance with current guidelines. Overall, the validity was high. The majority of variables showed an exact agreement exceeding 90%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data quality in the Swedish NPECR is generally high with respect to completeness, timeliness, comparability, and validity. Hence, the NPECR represents a reliable data source for monitoring the quality of penile cancer care and research. Data quality can be further improved by revision of reporting forms and manuals, training of reporting staff, and by organizational adjustments.</p>","PeriodicalId":21542,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","volume":"59 ","pages":"162-168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of data quality in the Swedish National Penile Cancer Register.\",\"authors\":\"Åsa Warnolf, Dominik Glombik, Fredrik Sandin, Mats Lambe, Gediminas Baseckas, Axel Gerdtsson, Kimia Kohestani, Peter Kirrander\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/sju.v59.42029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The National Penile Cancer Register (NPECR) in Sweden was initiated in year 2000 and currently contains more than 3,900 men diagnosed with penile cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate data quality in the NPECR in terms of completeness, timeliness, comparability, and validity.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Completeness was assessed by cross-linkage to the Swedish Cancer Register. Timeliness, defined as time from date of diagnosis to date of reporting in the NPECR, was calculated. Comparability was evaluated by reviewing and comparing coding routines in the NPECR with national and international guidelines. To assess validity, medical records of 375 men with a penile cancer diagnosis in the NPECR between 2017 and 2020 were reviewed and selected variables were re-abstracted and compared with previously registered data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Completeness was high (93%). Timeliness was in median 4.6 (Inter Quartile Range 2.6-8.8) months. Comparability was good with coding routines and the registration forms were in compliance with current guidelines. Overall, the validity was high. The majority of variables showed an exact agreement exceeding 90%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data quality in the Swedish NPECR is generally high with respect to completeness, timeliness, comparability, and validity. Hence, the NPECR represents a reliable data source for monitoring the quality of penile cancer care and research. Data quality can be further improved by revision of reporting forms and manuals, training of reporting staff, and by organizational adjustments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"59 \",\"pages\":\"162-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v59.42029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v59.42029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:瑞典全国阴茎癌登记(NPECR)于 2000 年启动,目前登记了 3900 多名确诊为阴茎癌的男性患者。本研究旨在从完整性、及时性、可比性和有效性等方面评估 NPECR 的数据质量:完整性通过与瑞典癌症登记册的交叉链接进行评估。及时性是指从诊断日期到在 NPECR 中报告日期的时间。通过审查和比较 NPECR 与国内和国际指南的编码例程来评估可比性。为评估有效性,对2017年至2020年间在NPECR中确诊为阴茎癌的375名男性的医疗记录进行了审查,并重新摘录了部分变量,与之前登记的数据进行了比较:完整性很高(93%)。及时性中位数为 4.6 个月(四分位间范围 2.6-8.8)。编码程序的可比性良好,登记表符合现行指南。总体而言,有效性很高。大多数变量的精确一致性超过 90%:瑞典 NPECR 在完整性、及时性、可比性和有效性方面的数据质量普遍较高。因此,NPECR 是监测阴茎癌治疗和研究质量的可靠数据来源。通过修订报告表格和手册、培训报告人员以及调整组织结构,可以进一步提高数据质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of data quality in the Swedish National Penile Cancer Register.

Objective: The National Penile Cancer Register (NPECR) in Sweden was initiated in year 2000 and currently contains more than 3,900 men diagnosed with penile cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate data quality in the NPECR in terms of completeness, timeliness, comparability, and validity.

Material and methods: Completeness was assessed by cross-linkage to the Swedish Cancer Register. Timeliness, defined as time from date of diagnosis to date of reporting in the NPECR, was calculated. Comparability was evaluated by reviewing and comparing coding routines in the NPECR with national and international guidelines. To assess validity, medical records of 375 men with a penile cancer diagnosis in the NPECR between 2017 and 2020 were reviewed and selected variables were re-abstracted and compared with previously registered data.

Results: Completeness was high (93%). Timeliness was in median 4.6 (Inter Quartile Range 2.6-8.8) months. Comparability was good with coding routines and the registration forms were in compliance with current guidelines. Overall, the validity was high. The majority of variables showed an exact agreement exceeding 90%.

Conclusion: Data quality in the Swedish NPECR is generally high with respect to completeness, timeliness, comparability, and validity. Hence, the NPECR represents a reliable data source for monitoring the quality of penile cancer care and research. Data quality can be further improved by revision of reporting forms and manuals, training of reporting staff, and by organizational adjustments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Urology is a journal for the clinical urologist and publishes papers within all fields in clinical urology. Experimental papers related to clinical questions are also invited.Important reports with great news value are published promptly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信