Comment on, "Decoding pediatric spinal tumors: a single-center retrospective case series on etiology, presentation, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes".

The article "Decoding pediatric spinal tumors: a single-center retrospective case series on etiology, presentation, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes" by Lenga et al. (2024) provides essential insights into pediatric spinal tumors, a rare and challenging area of medical research. The authors present a thorough analysis of clinical presentations, treatment strategies, and patient outcomes, offering valuable data to refine therapeutic approaches and improve outcomes. However, the study's retrospective design, confined to a single center, introduces potential biases and limits the generalizability of findings. The lack of long-term follow-up data and a control group further restricts the study's scope. Future research should prioritize multi-center collaborations, incorporate control groups, and extend follow-up durations to better understand long-term outcomes. The establishment of standardized treatment protocols is also recommended to enhance consistency in managing pediatric spinal tumors across diverse clinical settings.