利用化学计量学结合网络药理学全面研究枳壳与枳壳之间的同源性和异质性。

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Journal of medicinal food Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1089/jmf.2024.k.0071
Jie Gao, Meiqi Liu, Zijie Yang, Xiaoran Zhao, Zicheng Ma, Lili Sun, Yanan Liu, Xiaoliang Ren
{"title":"利用化学计量学结合网络药理学全面研究枳壳与枳壳之间的同源性和异质性。","authors":"Jie Gao, Meiqi Liu, Zijie Yang, Xiaoran Zhao, Zicheng Ma, Lili Sun, Yanan Liu, Xiaoliang Ren","doi":"10.1089/jmf.2024.k.0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aurantii Fructus (AF) and Aurantii Fructus Immaturus (AFI) are distinct herbs outlined by the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. They are sourced from the same plant but harvested at different times, resulting in differences in efficacy. It is important to avoid mixing them clinically and to distinguish between the two. Furthermore, dissimilar cultivation conditions may cause variability in the quality of herbs, so it is vital to differentiate drugs from dissimilar origins. In this study, two plants, AF and AFI from different provinces, were comparatively analyzed based on High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) fingerprints and classified using chemometric methods. The results indicate that the two medicines can be clearly distinguished. Also, AF and AFI grown in different locations can be distinguished. Ten chemical markers were screened, and their variations were determined, including eriocitrin, narirutin, naringin, meranzin hydrate, naringenin, hesperidin, nobiletin, tangeretin, neohesperidin, and poncirin. Subsequent network pharmacology correlated the screened chemical components with the biological network of the organism. The material basis of the difference in efficacy of the two homologous herbs was explored from the perspective of changes in chemical composition. This study provides a reference for formulating quality evaluation standards for AF and AFI and lays a foundation for the efficacy-related quality research of the two.</p>","PeriodicalId":16440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medicinal food","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive Investigation of Homology and Heterogeneity Between Aurantii Fructus and Aurantii Fructus Immaturus Using Chemometrics Combined with Network Pharmacology.\",\"authors\":\"Jie Gao, Meiqi Liu, Zijie Yang, Xiaoran Zhao, Zicheng Ma, Lili Sun, Yanan Liu, Xiaoliang Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jmf.2024.k.0071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aurantii Fructus (AF) and Aurantii Fructus Immaturus (AFI) are distinct herbs outlined by the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. They are sourced from the same plant but harvested at different times, resulting in differences in efficacy. It is important to avoid mixing them clinically and to distinguish between the two. Furthermore, dissimilar cultivation conditions may cause variability in the quality of herbs, so it is vital to differentiate drugs from dissimilar origins. In this study, two plants, AF and AFI from different provinces, were comparatively analyzed based on High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) fingerprints and classified using chemometric methods. The results indicate that the two medicines can be clearly distinguished. Also, AF and AFI grown in different locations can be distinguished. Ten chemical markers were screened, and their variations were determined, including eriocitrin, narirutin, naringin, meranzin hydrate, naringenin, hesperidin, nobiletin, tangeretin, neohesperidin, and poncirin. Subsequent network pharmacology correlated the screened chemical components with the biological network of the organism. The material basis of the difference in efficacy of the two homologous herbs was explored from the perspective of changes in chemical composition. This study provides a reference for formulating quality evaluation standards for AF and AFI and lays a foundation for the efficacy-related quality research of the two.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medicinal food\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medicinal food\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2024.k.0071\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medicinal food","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2024.k.0071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Aurantii Fructus(AF)和 Aurantii Fructus Immaturus(AFI)是《中国药典》中规定的不同药材。它们来自同一种植物,但采收时间不同,因此药效也不同。临床上必须避免混用,并将两者区分开来。此外,不同的栽培条件也会导致药材质量的差异,因此区分不同产地的药物至关重要。本研究根据高效液相色谱(HPLC)指纹图谱对来自不同省份的两种植物 AF 和 AFI 进行了比较分析,并采用化学计量学方法进行了分类。结果表明,这两种药物可以明显区分。此外,还能区分生长在不同地区的 AF 和 AFI。筛选并确定了十种化学标记物,包括麦角苷、柚皮苷、柚皮苷、水合美兰苷、柚皮苷、橙皮苷、柚皮苷、桔皮苷、新橙皮苷和柚皮苷。随后的网络药理学将筛选出的化学成分与生物体的生物网络联系起来。从化学成分变化的角度探讨了两种同源药材功效差异的物质基础。该研究为制定 AF 和 AFI 的质量评价标准提供了参考,并为两者功效相关的质量研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive Investigation of Homology and Heterogeneity Between Aurantii Fructus and Aurantii Fructus Immaturus Using Chemometrics Combined with Network Pharmacology.

Aurantii Fructus (AF) and Aurantii Fructus Immaturus (AFI) are distinct herbs outlined by the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. They are sourced from the same plant but harvested at different times, resulting in differences in efficacy. It is important to avoid mixing them clinically and to distinguish between the two. Furthermore, dissimilar cultivation conditions may cause variability in the quality of herbs, so it is vital to differentiate drugs from dissimilar origins. In this study, two plants, AF and AFI from different provinces, were comparatively analyzed based on High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) fingerprints and classified using chemometric methods. The results indicate that the two medicines can be clearly distinguished. Also, AF and AFI grown in different locations can be distinguished. Ten chemical markers were screened, and their variations were determined, including eriocitrin, narirutin, naringin, meranzin hydrate, naringenin, hesperidin, nobiletin, tangeretin, neohesperidin, and poncirin. Subsequent network pharmacology correlated the screened chemical components with the biological network of the organism. The material basis of the difference in efficacy of the two homologous herbs was explored from the perspective of changes in chemical composition. This study provides a reference for formulating quality evaluation standards for AF and AFI and lays a foundation for the efficacy-related quality research of the two.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of medicinal food
Journal of medicinal food 医学-食品科技
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medicinal Food is the only peer-reviewed journal focusing exclusively on the medicinal value and biomedical effects of food materials. International in scope, the Journal advances the knowledge of the development of new food products and dietary supplements targeted at promoting health and the prevention and treatment of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信