日本原发性醛固酮增多症分段肾上腺静脉取样与射频消融术的成本效益分析。

IF 2.1 4区 医学
Satoru Yanagaki, Kei Omata, Sota Oguro, Hideki Ota, Tomomi Sato, Hiroki Kamada, Hiromitsu Tannai, Yuta Tezuka, Yoshikiyo Ono, Miho Sato, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Kei Takase
{"title":"日本原发性醛固酮增多症分段肾上腺静脉取样与射频消融术的成本效益分析。","authors":"Satoru Yanagaki, Kei Omata, Sota Oguro, Hideki Ota, Tomomi Sato, Hiroki Kamada, Hiromitsu Tannai, Yuta Tezuka, Yoshikiyo Ono, Miho Sato, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Kei Takase","doi":"10.1007/s11604-024-01665-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of comprehensive treatment strategy, including segmental adrenal venous sampling (sAVS) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), versus medication-only strategy for primary aldosteronism.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A Markov decision model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive treatment strategy and a medication-only strategy for 50-year-old men and women with stage I-III hypertension. The comprehensive treatment strategy included aldosterone/renin ratio measurement, two loading tests, computed tomography, sAVS, drugs, surgery, and RFA. We built a model with a yearly cycle over 32- and 38-year time horizons for men and women, respectively, and four health states: hypertension, heart failure, stroke, and death. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as Japanese yen per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), was estimated, and strategy preference was determined on the basis of 5 million Japanese yen per QALY societal willingness-to-pay threshold.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ICERs of the comprehensive treatment strategy over the medication-only strategy were 201,482 and 3,399 JPY per QALY for men and women, respectively. The resultant ICER was less than the 5 million JPY societal willingness-to-pay threshold. Deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that the results varied with the input values, but the comprehensive strategy was likely to be more cost-effective than the medication-only strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This cost-effectiveness study revealed that a comprehensive treatment strategy including sAVS and RFA was favorable compared with the medication-only strategy for managing stage I-III hypertension in 50-year-old men and women, with acceptable willingness-to-pay thresholds. This cost-effectiveness study revealed that a comprehensive treatment strategy for primary aldosteronism that included segmental adrenal sampling and radiofrequency ablation was favorable compared with the medication-only strategy for managing stage I-III hypertension in 50-year-old men and women, with acceptable willingness-to-pay thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness analysis of segmental adrenal venous sampling with radiofrequency ablation for primary aldosteronism in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Satoru Yanagaki, Kei Omata, Sota Oguro, Hideki Ota, Tomomi Sato, Hiroki Kamada, Hiromitsu Tannai, Yuta Tezuka, Yoshikiyo Ono, Miho Sato, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Kei Takase\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11604-024-01665-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of comprehensive treatment strategy, including segmental adrenal venous sampling (sAVS) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), versus medication-only strategy for primary aldosteronism.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A Markov decision model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive treatment strategy and a medication-only strategy for 50-year-old men and women with stage I-III hypertension. The comprehensive treatment strategy included aldosterone/renin ratio measurement, two loading tests, computed tomography, sAVS, drugs, surgery, and RFA. We built a model with a yearly cycle over 32- and 38-year time horizons for men and women, respectively, and four health states: hypertension, heart failure, stroke, and death. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as Japanese yen per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), was estimated, and strategy preference was determined on the basis of 5 million Japanese yen per QALY societal willingness-to-pay threshold.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ICERs of the comprehensive treatment strategy over the medication-only strategy were 201,482 and 3,399 JPY per QALY for men and women, respectively. The resultant ICER was less than the 5 million JPY societal willingness-to-pay threshold. Deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that the results varied with the input values, but the comprehensive strategy was likely to be more cost-effective than the medication-only strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This cost-effectiveness study revealed that a comprehensive treatment strategy including sAVS and RFA was favorable compared with the medication-only strategy for managing stage I-III hypertension in 50-year-old men and women, with acceptable willingness-to-pay thresholds. This cost-effectiveness study revealed that a comprehensive treatment strategy for primary aldosteronism that included segmental adrenal sampling and radiofrequency ablation was favorable compared with the medication-only strategy for managing stage I-III hypertension in 50-year-old men and women, with acceptable willingness-to-pay thresholds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-024-01665-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-024-01665-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估原发性醛固酮增多症综合治疗策略(包括节段性肾上腺静脉采样(sAVS)和射频消融(RFA))与单纯药物治疗策略的成本效益:我们建立了一个马尔可夫决策模型,以比较综合治疗策略和单纯药物治疗策略对 50 岁男性和女性 I-III 期高血压患者的成本效益。综合治疗策略包括醛固酮/肾素比值测量、两项负荷试验、计算机断层扫描、sAVS、药物、手术和 RFA。我们为男性和女性分别建立了一个以 32 年和 38 年为时间跨度的年周期模型,以及四种健康状态:高血压、心力衰竭、中风和死亡。我们估算了以每质量调整生命年(QALYs)500 万日元表示的增量成本效益比(ICER),并根据每 QALY 500 万日元的社会支付意愿阈值确定了策略偏好:男性和女性的综合治疗策略的 ICER 分别为每 QALY 201,482 日元和 3,399 日元。由此得出的 ICER 低于 500 万日元的社会支付意愿阈值。确定性敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析表明,结果随输入值的变化而变化,但综合策略可能比单纯药物治疗策略更具成本效益:这项成本效益研究表明,在管理 50 岁男性和女性 I-III 期高血压时,包括 sAVS 和 RFA 在内的综合治疗策略比单纯药物治疗策略更有利,且支付意愿阈值可接受。这项成本效益研究表明,与纯药物治疗策略相比,包括节段性肾上腺取样和射频消融在内的原发性醛固酮增多症综合治疗策略对 50 岁男性和女性 I-III 期高血压的治疗效果更佳,且患者的支付意愿阈值可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-effectiveness analysis of segmental adrenal venous sampling with radiofrequency ablation for primary aldosteronism in Japan.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of comprehensive treatment strategy, including segmental adrenal venous sampling (sAVS) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), versus medication-only strategy for primary aldosteronism.

Materials and methods: A Markov decision model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive treatment strategy and a medication-only strategy for 50-year-old men and women with stage I-III hypertension. The comprehensive treatment strategy included aldosterone/renin ratio measurement, two loading tests, computed tomography, sAVS, drugs, surgery, and RFA. We built a model with a yearly cycle over 32- and 38-year time horizons for men and women, respectively, and four health states: hypertension, heart failure, stroke, and death. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as Japanese yen per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), was estimated, and strategy preference was determined on the basis of 5 million Japanese yen per QALY societal willingness-to-pay threshold.

Results: The ICERs of the comprehensive treatment strategy over the medication-only strategy were 201,482 and 3,399 JPY per QALY for men and women, respectively. The resultant ICER was less than the 5 million JPY societal willingness-to-pay threshold. Deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that the results varied with the input values, but the comprehensive strategy was likely to be more cost-effective than the medication-only strategy.

Conclusion: This cost-effectiveness study revealed that a comprehensive treatment strategy including sAVS and RFA was favorable compared with the medication-only strategy for managing stage I-III hypertension in 50-year-old men and women, with acceptable willingness-to-pay thresholds. This cost-effectiveness study revealed that a comprehensive treatment strategy for primary aldosteronism that included segmental adrenal sampling and radiofrequency ablation was favorable compared with the medication-only strategy for managing stage I-III hypertension in 50-year-old men and women, with acceptable willingness-to-pay thresholds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信