根据照明委员会(L'Eclairage Commission)的标准,三种校准器的色度变化。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Teresa Domingo-Jiménez, María José González-Olmo, Carolina Nieto-Moraleda, María Pérez-Chicharro, Martin Romero-Maroto
{"title":"根据照明委员会(L'Eclairage Commission)的标准,三种校准器的色度变化。","authors":"Teresa Domingo-Jiménez, María José González-Olmo, Carolina Nieto-Moraleda, María Pérez-Chicharro, Martin Romero-Maroto","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjae047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to compare the colourimetric increment (L*, a*, and b*) of three types of aligners after subjecting them to two stains and to evaluate the initial colourimetric characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 aligners (40 Invisalign®, 40 Spark®, and 40 QuickSmile®) were immersed in two different agents (distilled water and coffee). Measurements were taken using a spectrophotometer before immersion (T0), after 12 hours (T1), and after 7 days (T2). Colour changes (ΔE*) were evaluated based on the International Commission of L'Eclairage, and subsequently converted to National Bureau of Standards units. The measurement was repeated three times. The intraclass correlation coefficient, one-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test, and the independent t test were used (P ≤ .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T0, significant differences were observed for a*: Invisalign® and Spark® tended towards redder tones, whereas Quicksmile® leaned towards greener shades. Regarding b*, all aligners tended towards yellow, with Invisalign® exhibiting the least tendency. No differences were found in water between T1 and T0. In the intervals, T2-T1 and T2-T0, Spark® showed more noticeable changes, whereas for Invisalign® and Quicksmile®, the change was only slight. In coffee, a shift to another colour was detected in T1-T0, T2-T1, and T2-T0 for Invisalign®, whereas for other brands, it was barely noticeable except for T2-T0 in Spark®, where the change was appreciable. In coffee, Invisalign® tended towards darker values (L*), turning redder (a*), and more yellow (b*) in T2-T1 and T2-T0.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Invisalign® aligners initially presented a more reddish and less yellowish colour. In water, after 7 days, a noticeable colour change was found for Spark®. In coffee, a greater loss in brightness and a change to red and yellow were observed after 12 hours and 7 days for Invisalign®. This study highlights the importance of considering the impact of coffee on the colouring of aligners, especially with Invisalign®, which shows more noticeable changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":"46 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colourimetric changes experienced in three types of aligners according to the L'Eclairage Commission.\",\"authors\":\"Teresa Domingo-Jiménez, María José González-Olmo, Carolina Nieto-Moraleda, María Pérez-Chicharro, Martin Romero-Maroto\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ejo/cjae047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to compare the colourimetric increment (L*, a*, and b*) of three types of aligners after subjecting them to two stains and to evaluate the initial colourimetric characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 aligners (40 Invisalign®, 40 Spark®, and 40 QuickSmile®) were immersed in two different agents (distilled water and coffee). Measurements were taken using a spectrophotometer before immersion (T0), after 12 hours (T1), and after 7 days (T2). Colour changes (ΔE*) were evaluated based on the International Commission of L'Eclairage, and subsequently converted to National Bureau of Standards units. The measurement was repeated three times. The intraclass correlation coefficient, one-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test, and the independent t test were used (P ≤ .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T0, significant differences were observed for a*: Invisalign® and Spark® tended towards redder tones, whereas Quicksmile® leaned towards greener shades. Regarding b*, all aligners tended towards yellow, with Invisalign® exhibiting the least tendency. No differences were found in water between T1 and T0. In the intervals, T2-T1 and T2-T0, Spark® showed more noticeable changes, whereas for Invisalign® and Quicksmile®, the change was only slight. In coffee, a shift to another colour was detected in T1-T0, T2-T1, and T2-T0 for Invisalign®, whereas for other brands, it was barely noticeable except for T2-T0 in Spark®, where the change was appreciable. In coffee, Invisalign® tended towards darker values (L*), turning redder (a*), and more yellow (b*) in T2-T1 and T2-T0.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Invisalign® aligners initially presented a more reddish and less yellowish colour. In water, after 7 days, a noticeable colour change was found for Spark®. In coffee, a greater loss in brightness and a change to red and yellow were observed after 12 hours and 7 days for Invisalign®. This study highlights the importance of considering the impact of coffee on the colouring of aligners, especially with Invisalign®, which shows more noticeable changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"46 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjae047\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjae047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的目的是比较三种矫正器在两种染色剂作用下的比色增量(L*、a*和b*),并评估初始比色特性:将 120 个矫治器(40 个 Invisalign®、40 个 Spark® 和 40 个 QuickSmile®)浸入两种不同的染色剂(蒸馏水和咖啡)中。分别在浸泡前(T0)、12 小时后(T1)和 7 天后(T2)使用分光光度计进行测量。颜色变化(ΔE*)根据国际照明委员会(International Commission of L'Eclairage)进行评估,然后转换为国家标准局的单位。测量重复三次。采用类内相关系数、单因素方差分析、Tukey 后检验和独立 t 检验(P ≤ .05):结果:在 T0,观察到 a* 存在显著差异:隐适美®和Spark®偏向于红色,而Quicksmile®偏向于绿色。在 b* 方面,所有矫正器都偏向黄色,其中隐适美®矫正器的黄色倾向最小。在 T1 和 T0 之间没有发现水的差异。在 T2-T1 和 T2-T0 之间,Spark® 显示出更明显的变化,而 Invisalign® 和 Quicksmile® 的变化则很轻微。在咖啡中,Invisalign® 在 T1-T0、T2-T1 和 T2-T0 阶段检测到向另一种颜色的转变,而其他品牌则几乎不明显,只有 Spark® 在 T2-T0 阶段的变化明显。在咖啡中,隐适美®的数值(L*)趋向于深色,在T2-T1和T2-T0变红(a*),而在T2-T0变黄(b*):隐适美®矫正器最初呈现的颜色偏红,黄色较少。在水中,7 天后发现 Spark® 有明显的颜色变化。在咖啡中,经过 12 小时和 7 天后,隐适美®矫治器的亮度下降更多,颜色变为红色和黄色。这项研究强调了考虑咖啡对矫正器颜色影响的重要性,尤其是隐适美®矫正器,其颜色变化更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Colourimetric changes experienced in three types of aligners according to the L'Eclairage Commission.

Objective: The objective was to compare the colourimetric increment (L*, a*, and b*) of three types of aligners after subjecting them to two stains and to evaluate the initial colourimetric characteristics.

Methods: A total of 120 aligners (40 Invisalign®, 40 Spark®, and 40 QuickSmile®) were immersed in two different agents (distilled water and coffee). Measurements were taken using a spectrophotometer before immersion (T0), after 12 hours (T1), and after 7 days (T2). Colour changes (ΔE*) were evaluated based on the International Commission of L'Eclairage, and subsequently converted to National Bureau of Standards units. The measurement was repeated three times. The intraclass correlation coefficient, one-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test, and the independent t test were used (P ≤ .05).

Results: At T0, significant differences were observed for a*: Invisalign® and Spark® tended towards redder tones, whereas Quicksmile® leaned towards greener shades. Regarding b*, all aligners tended towards yellow, with Invisalign® exhibiting the least tendency. No differences were found in water between T1 and T0. In the intervals, T2-T1 and T2-T0, Spark® showed more noticeable changes, whereas for Invisalign® and Quicksmile®, the change was only slight. In coffee, a shift to another colour was detected in T1-T0, T2-T1, and T2-T0 for Invisalign®, whereas for other brands, it was barely noticeable except for T2-T0 in Spark®, where the change was appreciable. In coffee, Invisalign® tended towards darker values (L*), turning redder (a*), and more yellow (b*) in T2-T1 and T2-T0.

Conclusions: Invisalign® aligners initially presented a more reddish and less yellowish colour. In water, after 7 days, a noticeable colour change was found for Spark®. In coffee, a greater loss in brightness and a change to red and yellow were observed after 12 hours and 7 days for Invisalign®. This study highlights the importance of considering the impact of coffee on the colouring of aligners, especially with Invisalign®, which shows more noticeable changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信