用较少的降压药物达到最佳血压控制效果:主要在低风险高血压患者中实现。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Zhanyang Zhou, Huanhuan Miao, Shijie Yang, Zheng Yin, Yingjun Chen, Yuqing Zhang
{"title":"用较少的降压药物达到最佳血压控制效果:主要在低风险高血压患者中实现。","authors":"Zhanyang Zhou, Huanhuan Miao, Shijie Yang, Zheng Yin, Yingjun Chen, Yuqing Zhang","doi":"10.1111/jch.14903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies indicate that intensive blood pressure (BP) targets can be reached with less than two medications. This cross-sectional study, involving 4991 individuals from the Majiapu community, assessed the correlation between BP control and the burden of antihypertensive drugs. Participants on medication were categorized into controlled (BP < 140/90 mm Hg) and uncontrolled (BP ≥ 140/90 mm Hg) groups, with the former further divided into optimal (BP < 130/80 mm Hg) and good control (BP < 140/90 but >130/80 mm Hg) subgroups. Multivariate logistic regression analyzed factors affecting hypertension control across these BP categories. The study found that, 54% of participants had hypertension. Of those treated (62.5%), 55.7% achieved BP control, including 23.15% maintaining BP below 130/80 mm Hg. The average number of antihypertensive medications was 1.61 for the controlled group (with an average BP of 126.6/76 mm Hg) and 1.75 for the uncontrolled group (with an average BP of 150.6/84.0 mm Hg). Additionally, the average number of antihypertensive medications was 1.66 in the good control group and 1.55 in the optimal control group. The uncontrolled group had a higher mean systematic coronary risk estimation (SCORE) of 5.59, against 3.97 and 2.5 in the good and optimal control groups, respectively. Key factors linked to poor BP control included age over 65, male sex, obesity, and former smoking, whereas lipid-lowering medication use was associated with better control. In conclusions, patients needing fewer antihypertensive drugs to achieve stricter targets may have a lower risk profile. Notably, only a small proportion of treated patients are low-risk individuals who can easily achieve BP levels below 130/80 mm Hg.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal blood pressure control with fewer antihypertensive medications: Achieved mostly in low-risk hypertensive patients.\",\"authors\":\"Zhanyang Zhou, Huanhuan Miao, Shijie Yang, Zheng Yin, Yingjun Chen, Yuqing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.14903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent studies indicate that intensive blood pressure (BP) targets can be reached with less than two medications. This cross-sectional study, involving 4991 individuals from the Majiapu community, assessed the correlation between BP control and the burden of antihypertensive drugs. Participants on medication were categorized into controlled (BP < 140/90 mm Hg) and uncontrolled (BP ≥ 140/90 mm Hg) groups, with the former further divided into optimal (BP < 130/80 mm Hg) and good control (BP < 140/90 but >130/80 mm Hg) subgroups. Multivariate logistic regression analyzed factors affecting hypertension control across these BP categories. The study found that, 54% of participants had hypertension. Of those treated (62.5%), 55.7% achieved BP control, including 23.15% maintaining BP below 130/80 mm Hg. The average number of antihypertensive medications was 1.61 for the controlled group (with an average BP of 126.6/76 mm Hg) and 1.75 for the uncontrolled group (with an average BP of 150.6/84.0 mm Hg). Additionally, the average number of antihypertensive medications was 1.66 in the good control group and 1.55 in the optimal control group. The uncontrolled group had a higher mean systematic coronary risk estimation (SCORE) of 5.59, against 3.97 and 2.5 in the good and optimal control groups, respectively. Key factors linked to poor BP control included age over 65, male sex, obesity, and former smoking, whereas lipid-lowering medication use was associated with better control. In conclusions, patients needing fewer antihypertensive drugs to achieve stricter targets may have a lower risk profile. Notably, only a small proportion of treated patients are low-risk individuals who can easily achieve BP levels below 130/80 mm Hg.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.14903\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.14903","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的研究表明,只需服用不到两种药物就能达到强化血压(BP)目标。这项横断面研究涉及马家堡社区的 4991 人,评估了血压控制与降压药物负担之间的相关性。接受药物治疗的参与者被分为血压控制(血压 130/80 mm Hg)亚组。多变量逻辑回归分析了这些血压类别中影响高血压控制的因素。研究发现,54% 的参与者患有高血压。在接受治疗的人(62.5%)中,55.7%实现了血压控制,其中23.15%将血压维持在130/80毫米汞柱以下。控制组(平均血压为 126.6/76 mm Hg)和未控制组(平均血压为 150.6/84.0 mm Hg)的平均降压药物服用次数分别为 1.61 次和 1.75 次。此外,良好控制组的平均降压药物数量为 1.66 种,最佳控制组为 1.55 种。未控制组的平均系统冠状动脉风险估计值(SCORE)较高,为 5.59,而良好控制组和最佳控制组分别为 3.97 和 2.5。与血压控制不佳有关的主要因素包括 65 岁以上、男性、肥胖和曾经吸烟,而降脂药物的使用与较好的血压控制有关。结论是,需要使用较少降压药以达到更严格目标的患者可能风险较低。值得注意的是,在接受治疗的患者中,只有一小部分是低风险人群,他们可以轻松将血压控制在 130/80 mm Hg 以下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal blood pressure control with fewer antihypertensive medications: Achieved mostly in low-risk hypertensive patients.

Recent studies indicate that intensive blood pressure (BP) targets can be reached with less than two medications. This cross-sectional study, involving 4991 individuals from the Majiapu community, assessed the correlation between BP control and the burden of antihypertensive drugs. Participants on medication were categorized into controlled (BP < 140/90 mm Hg) and uncontrolled (BP ≥ 140/90 mm Hg) groups, with the former further divided into optimal (BP < 130/80 mm Hg) and good control (BP < 140/90 but >130/80 mm Hg) subgroups. Multivariate logistic regression analyzed factors affecting hypertension control across these BP categories. The study found that, 54% of participants had hypertension. Of those treated (62.5%), 55.7% achieved BP control, including 23.15% maintaining BP below 130/80 mm Hg. The average number of antihypertensive medications was 1.61 for the controlled group (with an average BP of 126.6/76 mm Hg) and 1.75 for the uncontrolled group (with an average BP of 150.6/84.0 mm Hg). Additionally, the average number of antihypertensive medications was 1.66 in the good control group and 1.55 in the optimal control group. The uncontrolled group had a higher mean systematic coronary risk estimation (SCORE) of 5.59, against 3.97 and 2.5 in the good and optimal control groups, respectively. Key factors linked to poor BP control included age over 65, male sex, obesity, and former smoking, whereas lipid-lowering medication use was associated with better control. In conclusions, patients needing fewer antihypertensive drugs to achieve stricter targets may have a lower risk profile. Notably, only a small proportion of treated patients are low-risk individuals who can easily achieve BP levels below 130/80 mm Hg.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信