{"title":"医疗和社会护理专业人员何时以及在何种情况下可以接受以患者为目标的谷歌搜索?叙事回顾与主题分析。","authors":"Gemma Ryan-Blackwell, Jessica Jackson, Sharif Haider","doi":"10.1177/14604582241285756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patient-targeted Googling (PTG) is the use of Internet search engines by care professionals to source information about their patients. <b>Objective:</b> To thematically analyse research evidence on PTG and explain what, why and how it can be used for the benefit of patient care. <b>Methods:</b> The Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review articles was used as a reporting tool. Studies were identified via AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE and APA PsycInfo, ProQuest, and grey literature via Google Scholar. <b>Results:</b> 19 studies were included, and content was thematically analysed. Themes included practitioner behaviours, attitudes and experience, the nature of online information, when PTG is not acceptable, when, why and how is PTG acceptable and the need for education and training on PTG. <b>Discussion & conclusion:</b> In the absence of professional guidance, it makes practical recommendations about why and in what circumstances can use patient-targeted Googling for the benefit of patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"30 3","pages":"14604582241285756"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When and in what circumstances is patient-targeted googling acceptable for health and social care professionals? A narrative review and thematic analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gemma Ryan-Blackwell, Jessica Jackson, Sharif Haider\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14604582241285756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patient-targeted Googling (PTG) is the use of Internet search engines by care professionals to source information about their patients. <b>Objective:</b> To thematically analyse research evidence on PTG and explain what, why and how it can be used for the benefit of patient care. <b>Methods:</b> The Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review articles was used as a reporting tool. Studies were identified via AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE and APA PsycInfo, ProQuest, and grey literature via Google Scholar. <b>Results:</b> 19 studies were included, and content was thematically analysed. Themes included practitioner behaviours, attitudes and experience, the nature of online information, when PTG is not acceptable, when, why and how is PTG acceptable and the need for education and training on PTG. <b>Discussion & conclusion:</b> In the absence of professional guidance, it makes practical recommendations about why and in what circumstances can use patient-targeted Googling for the benefit of patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"14604582241285756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241285756\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241285756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
When and in what circumstances is patient-targeted googling acceptable for health and social care professionals? A narrative review and thematic analysis.
Background: Patient-targeted Googling (PTG) is the use of Internet search engines by care professionals to source information about their patients. Objective: To thematically analyse research evidence on PTG and explain what, why and how it can be used for the benefit of patient care. Methods: The Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review articles was used as a reporting tool. Studies were identified via AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE and APA PsycInfo, ProQuest, and grey literature via Google Scholar. Results: 19 studies were included, and content was thematically analysed. Themes included practitioner behaviours, attitudes and experience, the nature of online information, when PTG is not acceptable, when, why and how is PTG acceptable and the need for education and training on PTG. Discussion & conclusion: In the absence of professional guidance, it makes practical recommendations about why and in what circumstances can use patient-targeted Googling for the benefit of patient care.
期刊介绍:
Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.