评估用于区分细菌和病毒性呼吸道感染的 MeMed BV 检测方法。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Karen C Carroll
{"title":"评估用于区分细菌和病毒性呼吸道感染的 MeMed BV 检测方法。","authors":"Karen C Carroll","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2024.2408743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Distinguishing bacterial from viral infections remains a challenge due to clinically indistinguishable presentations. Non-infectious conditions such as malignancy, pulmonary emboli and rheumatological conditions may also present with fever. Consequently, patients are often over-treated with antimicrobial agents or may not receive adequate therapy.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article provides a comprehensive review of a novel protein host-signature assay, the MeMed BV assay, that distinguishes bacterial from viral infections. The focus is on the use of the test in respiratory tract infections including assay performance characteristics, clinical profiles and data on cost-effectiveness. The changing landscape from the use of single inflammatory biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein, to alternative and diverse host signature biomarkers, is also discussed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The MeMed BV assay is one of several novel host biomarkers that provide rapid results and demonstrate enhanced performance compared to single test biomarkers. This assay has been validated by a large number of carefully controlled clinical trials that demonstrate improved performance characteristics for distinguishing bacterial infections or combined bacterial/viral infections from viral or noninfectious causes of fever compared to C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. However, these trials may over-state assay performance as samples with equivocal band results are often not included in the statistical analysis. More real-world studies addressing clinical implementation of the MeMed BV assay or other biomarkers into ambulatory settings are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of MeMed BV assays for differentiating between bacterial and viral respiratory infections.\",\"authors\":\"Karen C Carroll\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737159.2024.2408743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Distinguishing bacterial from viral infections remains a challenge due to clinically indistinguishable presentations. Non-infectious conditions such as malignancy, pulmonary emboli and rheumatological conditions may also present with fever. Consequently, patients are often over-treated with antimicrobial agents or may not receive adequate therapy.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article provides a comprehensive review of a novel protein host-signature assay, the MeMed BV assay, that distinguishes bacterial from viral infections. The focus is on the use of the test in respiratory tract infections including assay performance characteristics, clinical profiles and data on cost-effectiveness. The changing landscape from the use of single inflammatory biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein, to alternative and diverse host signature biomarkers, is also discussed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The MeMed BV assay is one of several novel host biomarkers that provide rapid results and demonstrate enhanced performance compared to single test biomarkers. This assay has been validated by a large number of carefully controlled clinical trials that demonstrate improved performance characteristics for distinguishing bacterial infections or combined bacterial/viral infections from viral or noninfectious causes of fever compared to C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. However, these trials may over-state assay performance as samples with equivocal band results are often not included in the statistical analysis. More real-world studies addressing clinical implementation of the MeMed BV assay or other biomarkers into ambulatory settings are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2024.2408743\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2024.2408743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:由于临床表现难以区分,因此区分细菌和病毒感染仍是一项挑战。恶性肿瘤、肺栓塞和风湿病等非感染性疾病也可能出现发热。因此,患者往往会过度使用抗菌药物,或者没有得到适当的治疗:本文全面综述了一种新型蛋白质宿主标志检测法--MeMed BV 检测法,该检测法可区分细菌和病毒感染。重点是该检测方法在呼吸道感染中的应用,包括检测性能特点、临床概况和成本效益数据。此外,还讨论了从使用单一炎症生物标志物(如 C 反应蛋白)到使用替代性和多样化宿主特征生物标志物的变化情况:MeMed BV 检测法是几种新型宿主生物标志物之一,与单一检测生物标志物相比,它能提供快速结果并显示出更强的性能。该检测方法已通过大量仔细对照的临床试验进行了验证,与 C 反应蛋白和降钙素原相比,该检测方法在区分细菌感染或细菌/病毒合并感染以及病毒或非感染性发热方面具有更好的性能特征。不过,这些试验可能会夸大检测性能,因为带状结果不明确的样本往往不包括在统计分析中。需要进行更多的实际研究,探讨在非住院环境中临床应用 MeMed BV 检测法或其他生物标记物的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of MeMed BV assays for differentiating between bacterial and viral respiratory infections.

Introduction: Distinguishing bacterial from viral infections remains a challenge due to clinically indistinguishable presentations. Non-infectious conditions such as malignancy, pulmonary emboli and rheumatological conditions may also present with fever. Consequently, patients are often over-treated with antimicrobial agents or may not receive adequate therapy.

Areas covered: This article provides a comprehensive review of a novel protein host-signature assay, the MeMed BV assay, that distinguishes bacterial from viral infections. The focus is on the use of the test in respiratory tract infections including assay performance characteristics, clinical profiles and data on cost-effectiveness. The changing landscape from the use of single inflammatory biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein, to alternative and diverse host signature biomarkers, is also discussed.

Expert opinion: The MeMed BV assay is one of several novel host biomarkers that provide rapid results and demonstrate enhanced performance compared to single test biomarkers. This assay has been validated by a large number of carefully controlled clinical trials that demonstrate improved performance characteristics for distinguishing bacterial infections or combined bacterial/viral infections from viral or noninfectious causes of fever compared to C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. However, these trials may over-state assay performance as samples with equivocal band results are often not included in the statistical analysis. More real-world studies addressing clinical implementation of the MeMed BV assay or other biomarkers into ambulatory settings are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting. Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信