Tianlang Zhao, Jingqiu Mao, Pawan Gupta, Huanxin Zhang, Jun Wang
{"title":"阿拉斯加野火季节气溶胶光学深度与地表 PM2.5 关系的观测制约因素。","authors":"Tianlang Zhao, Jingqiu Mao, Pawan Gupta, Huanxin Zhang, Jun Wang","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.4c00120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wildfire is one of the main sources of PM<sub>2.5</sub> (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 2.5 μm) in the Alaskan summer. The complexity in wildfire smokes, as well as limited coverage of ground measurements, poses a big challenge to estimate surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> during wildfire season in Alaska. Here we aim at proposing a quick and direct method to estimate surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> over Alaska, especially in places exposed to strong wildfire events with limited measurements. We compare the AOD-surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> conversion factor (η = PM<sub>2.5</sub>/AOD; AOD, aerosol optical depth) from the chemical transport model GEOS-Chem (η<sub>GC</sub>) and from observations (η<sub>obs</sub>). We show that η<sub>GC</sub> is biased high compared to η<sub>obs</sub> under smoky conditions, largely because GEOS-Chem assigns the majority of AOD (67%) within the planetary boundary layer (PBL) when AOD > 1, inconsistent with satellite retrievals from CALIOP. The overestimation in η<sub>GC</sub> can be to some extent improved by increasing the injection height of wildfire emissions. We constructed a piecewise function for η<sub>obs</sub> across different AOD ranges based on VIIRS-SNPP AOD and PurpleAir surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> measurements over Alaska in the 2019 summer and then applied it on VIIRS AOD to derive daily surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> over continental Alaska in the 2021 and 2022 summers. The derived satellite PM<sub>2.5</sub> shows a good agreement with corrected PurpleAir PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Alaska during the 2021 and 2022 summers, suggesting that aerosol vertical distribution likely represents the largest uncertainty in converting AOD to surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations. This piecewise function, η'<sub>obs</sub>, shows the capability of providing an observation-based, quick and direct estimation of daily surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> over the whole of Alaska during wildfires, without running a 3-D model in real time.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"1 9","pages":"1164-1176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11407303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observational Constraints on the Aerosol Optical Depth-Surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> Relationship during Alaskan Wildfire Seasons.\",\"authors\":\"Tianlang Zhao, Jingqiu Mao, Pawan Gupta, Huanxin Zhang, Jun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsestair.4c00120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Wildfire is one of the main sources of PM<sub>2.5</sub> (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 2.5 μm) in the Alaskan summer. The complexity in wildfire smokes, as well as limited coverage of ground measurements, poses a big challenge to estimate surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> during wildfire season in Alaska. Here we aim at proposing a quick and direct method to estimate surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> over Alaska, especially in places exposed to strong wildfire events with limited measurements. We compare the AOD-surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> conversion factor (η = PM<sub>2.5</sub>/AOD; AOD, aerosol optical depth) from the chemical transport model GEOS-Chem (η<sub>GC</sub>) and from observations (η<sub>obs</sub>). We show that η<sub>GC</sub> is biased high compared to η<sub>obs</sub> under smoky conditions, largely because GEOS-Chem assigns the majority of AOD (67%) within the planetary boundary layer (PBL) when AOD > 1, inconsistent with satellite retrievals from CALIOP. The overestimation in η<sub>GC</sub> can be to some extent improved by increasing the injection height of wildfire emissions. We constructed a piecewise function for η<sub>obs</sub> across different AOD ranges based on VIIRS-SNPP AOD and PurpleAir surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> measurements over Alaska in the 2019 summer and then applied it on VIIRS AOD to derive daily surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> over continental Alaska in the 2021 and 2022 summers. The derived satellite PM<sub>2.5</sub> shows a good agreement with corrected PurpleAir PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Alaska during the 2021 and 2022 summers, suggesting that aerosol vertical distribution likely represents the largest uncertainty in converting AOD to surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations. This piecewise function, η'<sub>obs</sub>, shows the capability of providing an observation-based, quick and direct estimation of daily surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> over the whole of Alaska during wildfires, without running a 3-D model in real time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"volume\":\"1 9\",\"pages\":\"1164-1176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11407303/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Observational Constraints on the Aerosol Optical Depth-Surface PM2.5 Relationship during Alaskan Wildfire Seasons.
Wildfire is one of the main sources of PM2.5 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 2.5 μm) in the Alaskan summer. The complexity in wildfire smokes, as well as limited coverage of ground measurements, poses a big challenge to estimate surface PM2.5 during wildfire season in Alaska. Here we aim at proposing a quick and direct method to estimate surface PM2.5 over Alaska, especially in places exposed to strong wildfire events with limited measurements. We compare the AOD-surface PM2.5 conversion factor (η = PM2.5/AOD; AOD, aerosol optical depth) from the chemical transport model GEOS-Chem (ηGC) and from observations (ηobs). We show that ηGC is biased high compared to ηobs under smoky conditions, largely because GEOS-Chem assigns the majority of AOD (67%) within the planetary boundary layer (PBL) when AOD > 1, inconsistent with satellite retrievals from CALIOP. The overestimation in ηGC can be to some extent improved by increasing the injection height of wildfire emissions. We constructed a piecewise function for ηobs across different AOD ranges based on VIIRS-SNPP AOD and PurpleAir surface PM2.5 measurements over Alaska in the 2019 summer and then applied it on VIIRS AOD to derive daily surface PM2.5 over continental Alaska in the 2021 and 2022 summers. The derived satellite PM2.5 shows a good agreement with corrected PurpleAir PM2.5 in Alaska during the 2021 and 2022 summers, suggesting that aerosol vertical distribution likely represents the largest uncertainty in converting AOD to surface PM2.5 concentrations. This piecewise function, η'obs, shows the capability of providing an observation-based, quick and direct estimation of daily surface PM2.5 over the whole of Alaska during wildfires, without running a 3-D model in real time.