独立 Kahook 双刀眼球切开术与 Ab-Interno 闭合结膜 Xen 凝胶支架植入术的 36 个月疗效对比。

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-09-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S473303
Nithya Boopathiraj, Isabella V Wagner, Paul Connor Lentz, Christian Draper, Chelsey Krambeer, Yazan S Abubaker, Bryan Chin Hou Ang, Darby D Miller, Syril Dorairaj
{"title":"独立 Kahook 双刀眼球切开术与 Ab-Interno 闭合结膜 Xen 凝胶支架植入术的 36 个月疗效对比。","authors":"Nithya Boopathiraj, Isabella V Wagner, Paul Connor Lentz, Christian Draper, Chelsey Krambeer, Yazan S Abubaker, Bryan Chin Hou Ang, Darby D Miller, Syril Dorairaj","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S473303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the safety and effectiveness of standalone Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) excisional goniotomy to standalone ab-interno Xen gel stent implantation in eyes with moderate-to-severe open-angle glaucoma (OAG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective study including eyes with moderate-to-severe OAG undergoing standalone KDB goniotomy or Xen gel stent implantation was conducted. Intraocular pressure (IOP), the number of antiglaucoma medications taken daily, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were recorded at baseline and for up to 36-months. Primary outcomes assessed included changes from baseline in IOP and the number of antiglaucoma medications taken. Intergroup comparisons were conducted using independent-samples Student's <i>t</i>-tests. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative adverse events and the need for glaucoma surgical re-interventions were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eyes receiving standalone KDB (n=26) or Xen gel stent (n=45) surgery were analyzed. The baseline mean IOP and number of antiglaucoma medications in both groups were as follows: KDB: 23.2 ± 6.0 mmHg, 2.2 ± 1.4 medications; Xen: 22.7 ± 8.8 mmHg, 3.0 ± 1.0 medications. At 36 months, IOP was reduced to 16.6 ± 5.4 mmHg in KDB eyes (n=23, -23.5%; p=0.0004) and 15.3 ± 5.6 mmHg in Xen gel stent eyes (n=15, -22.1%; p=0.006), while number of antiglaucoma medications was reduced to 1.1 ± 0.7 (-30.8%; p=0.0005) and 2.2 ± 1.4 (-25.6%; p=0.01), respectively. Three eyes (11.5%) in the KDB group and 19 eyes (42.2%) in the Xen gel stent group required additional surgery before month 36 due to refractory high IOP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both KDB goniotomy and Xen gel stent implantation significantly lowered the IOP and antiglaucoma medication burden in patients with moderate-to-severe OAG. While the Xen gel stent is frequently used to treat moderate-to-severe OAG patients with uncontrolled IOP, standalone KDB goniotomy may be equally effective as a long-term intervention, reducing the need for subsequent glaucoma surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11414631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"36-Month Outcomes of Standalone Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy Compared with Ab-Interno Closed Conjunctiva Xen Gel Stent Implantation.\",\"authors\":\"Nithya Boopathiraj, Isabella V Wagner, Paul Connor Lentz, Christian Draper, Chelsey Krambeer, Yazan S Abubaker, Bryan Chin Hou Ang, Darby D Miller, Syril Dorairaj\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S473303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the safety and effectiveness of standalone Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) excisional goniotomy to standalone ab-interno Xen gel stent implantation in eyes with moderate-to-severe open-angle glaucoma (OAG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective study including eyes with moderate-to-severe OAG undergoing standalone KDB goniotomy or Xen gel stent implantation was conducted. Intraocular pressure (IOP), the number of antiglaucoma medications taken daily, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were recorded at baseline and for up to 36-months. Primary outcomes assessed included changes from baseline in IOP and the number of antiglaucoma medications taken. Intergroup comparisons were conducted using independent-samples Student's <i>t</i>-tests. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative adverse events and the need for glaucoma surgical re-interventions were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eyes receiving standalone KDB (n=26) or Xen gel stent (n=45) surgery were analyzed. The baseline mean IOP and number of antiglaucoma medications in both groups were as follows: KDB: 23.2 ± 6.0 mmHg, 2.2 ± 1.4 medications; Xen: 22.7 ± 8.8 mmHg, 3.0 ± 1.0 medications. At 36 months, IOP was reduced to 16.6 ± 5.4 mmHg in KDB eyes (n=23, -23.5%; p=0.0004) and 15.3 ± 5.6 mmHg in Xen gel stent eyes (n=15, -22.1%; p=0.006), while number of antiglaucoma medications was reduced to 1.1 ± 0.7 (-30.8%; p=0.0005) and 2.2 ± 1.4 (-25.6%; p=0.01), respectively. Three eyes (11.5%) in the KDB group and 19 eyes (42.2%) in the Xen gel stent group required additional surgery before month 36 due to refractory high IOP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both KDB goniotomy and Xen gel stent implantation significantly lowered the IOP and antiglaucoma medication burden in patients with moderate-to-severe OAG. While the Xen gel stent is frequently used to treat moderate-to-severe OAG patients with uncontrolled IOP, standalone KDB goniotomy may be equally effective as a long-term intervention, reducing the need for subsequent glaucoma surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11414631/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S473303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S473303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较中度至重度开角型青光眼(OAG)患者接受独立的 Kahook 双刀(KDB)眼球切开术和独立的ab-intero Xen 凝胶支架植入术的安全性和有效性:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,研究对象包括接受独立KDB眼球切开术或Xen凝胶支架植入术的中重度开角型青光眼患者。研究人员记录了基线和长达 36 个月的眼压(IOP)、每天服用的抗青光眼药物数量和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。评估的主要结果包括眼压和抗青光眼药物服用次数与基线相比的变化。组间比较采用独立样本学生 t 检验。此外,还记录了术中、术后不良事件的发生率以及青光眼手术再干预的需求:对接受独立KDB(26只)或Xen凝胶支架(45只)手术的眼睛进行了分析。两组的基线平均眼压和抗青光眼药物数量如下:KDB:23.2 ± 6.0 mmHg,2.2 ± 1.4 种药物;Xen:22.7 ± 8.8 mmHg,3.0 ± 1.0 种药物。36 个月时,KDB 眼睛的眼压降至 16.6 ± 5.4 mmHg(n=23,-23.5%;p=0.0004),Xen 凝胶支架眼睛的眼压降至 15.3 ± 5.6 mmHg(n=15,-22.1%;p=0.006),而抗青光眼药物的数量分别降至 1.1 ± 0.7(-30.8%;p=0.0005)和 2.2 ± 1.4(-25.6%;p=0.01)。KDB组和Xen凝胶支架组分别有3只眼睛(11.5%)和19只眼睛(42.2%)在第36个月前因难治性高眼压而需要再次手术:结论:KDB眼球切开术和Xen凝胶支架植入术都能显著降低中重度OAG患者的眼压和抗青光眼药物负担。虽然Xen凝胶支架常用于治疗眼压无法控制的中重度OAG患者,但作为一种长期干预措施,独立的KDB开孔术可能同样有效,可减少后续青光眼手术的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
36-Month Outcomes of Standalone Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy Compared with Ab-Interno Closed Conjunctiva Xen Gel Stent Implantation.

Purpose: To compare the safety and effectiveness of standalone Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) excisional goniotomy to standalone ab-interno Xen gel stent implantation in eyes with moderate-to-severe open-angle glaucoma (OAG).

Methods: A single-center, retrospective study including eyes with moderate-to-severe OAG undergoing standalone KDB goniotomy or Xen gel stent implantation was conducted. Intraocular pressure (IOP), the number of antiglaucoma medications taken daily, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were recorded at baseline and for up to 36-months. Primary outcomes assessed included changes from baseline in IOP and the number of antiglaucoma medications taken. Intergroup comparisons were conducted using independent-samples Student's t-tests. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative adverse events and the need for glaucoma surgical re-interventions were also recorded.

Results: Eyes receiving standalone KDB (n=26) or Xen gel stent (n=45) surgery were analyzed. The baseline mean IOP and number of antiglaucoma medications in both groups were as follows: KDB: 23.2 ± 6.0 mmHg, 2.2 ± 1.4 medications; Xen: 22.7 ± 8.8 mmHg, 3.0 ± 1.0 medications. At 36 months, IOP was reduced to 16.6 ± 5.4 mmHg in KDB eyes (n=23, -23.5%; p=0.0004) and 15.3 ± 5.6 mmHg in Xen gel stent eyes (n=15, -22.1%; p=0.006), while number of antiglaucoma medications was reduced to 1.1 ± 0.7 (-30.8%; p=0.0005) and 2.2 ± 1.4 (-25.6%; p=0.01), respectively. Three eyes (11.5%) in the KDB group and 19 eyes (42.2%) in the Xen gel stent group required additional surgery before month 36 due to refractory high IOP.

Conclusion: Both KDB goniotomy and Xen gel stent implantation significantly lowered the IOP and antiglaucoma medication burden in patients with moderate-to-severe OAG. While the Xen gel stent is frequently used to treat moderate-to-severe OAG patients with uncontrolled IOP, standalone KDB goniotomy may be equally effective as a long-term intervention, reducing the need for subsequent glaucoma surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信