延长低温机灌注时间对肾移植预后影响的配对分析。

Carlos Verdiales, Luke Baxter, Hyun Ja Lim, Gavin Beck, Michael A Moser
{"title":"延长低温机灌注时间对肾移植预后影响的配对分析。","authors":"Carlos Verdiales, Luke Baxter, Hyun Ja Lim, Gavin Beck, Michael A Moser","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i3.95233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) has demonstrated benefits in terms of early kidney transplant function compared to static cold storage. While longer preservation times have shown detrimental effects, a previous paired study indicated that longer pump times (the second kidney in a pair) might lead to improved outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To revisit the prior paired study's somewhat unexpected results by reviewing our program's experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 61 pairs of transplant recipients who received kidneys from the same donor (2012-2021) were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they were transplanted first (K1) or second (K2). Therefore, the patients in each pair had identical donor characteristics, except for time on the pump. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meyer analysis and paired tests, including McNemar's test, student's paired <i>t</i>-test, or Wilcoxon's test, as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups of recipients had similar demographics (age, body mass index, diabetes, time on dialysis, sensitization and retransplants). Cold ischemic times for K1 and K2 were 8.9 (95%CI: 7.9, 9.8) and 14.7 hours (13.7, 15.8) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), respectively. Overall, K2 had a higher rate of freedom from biopsy-proven acute rejection at 1 year (<i>P</i> = 0.015). Delayed graft function was less common in K2, 12/61 (20%) than in K1, 20/61 (33%) (<i>P</i> = 0.046). Finally, K2 showed a higher graft survival than K1 (<i>P</i> = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results agree with a previous study that suggested possible advantages to longer pump times. Both studies should encourage further research into HMP's potential anti-inflammatory effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":65557,"journal":{"name":"世界移植杂志","volume":"14 3","pages":"95233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11317862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Matched pair analysis of the effect of longer hypothermic machine perfusion time on kidney transplant outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Verdiales, Luke Baxter, Hyun Ja Lim, Gavin Beck, Michael A Moser\",\"doi\":\"10.5500/wjt.v14.i3.95233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) has demonstrated benefits in terms of early kidney transplant function compared to static cold storage. While longer preservation times have shown detrimental effects, a previous paired study indicated that longer pump times (the second kidney in a pair) might lead to improved outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To revisit the prior paired study's somewhat unexpected results by reviewing our program's experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 61 pairs of transplant recipients who received kidneys from the same donor (2012-2021) were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they were transplanted first (K1) or second (K2). Therefore, the patients in each pair had identical donor characteristics, except for time on the pump. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meyer analysis and paired tests, including McNemar's test, student's paired <i>t</i>-test, or Wilcoxon's test, as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups of recipients had similar demographics (age, body mass index, diabetes, time on dialysis, sensitization and retransplants). Cold ischemic times for K1 and K2 were 8.9 (95%CI: 7.9, 9.8) and 14.7 hours (13.7, 15.8) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), respectively. Overall, K2 had a higher rate of freedom from biopsy-proven acute rejection at 1 year (<i>P</i> = 0.015). Delayed graft function was less common in K2, 12/61 (20%) than in K1, 20/61 (33%) (<i>P</i> = 0.046). Finally, K2 showed a higher graft survival than K1 (<i>P</i> = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results agree with a previous study that suggested possible advantages to longer pump times. Both studies should encourage further research into HMP's potential anti-inflammatory effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":65557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"世界移植杂志\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"95233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11317862/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"世界移植杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i3.95233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界移植杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i3.95233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与静态冷藏相比,低温机灌注(HMP)对早期肾移植功能有好处。虽然较长的保存时间显示出不利影响,但之前的一项配对研究表明,较长的泵血时间(配对中的第二个肾脏)可能会改善结果:方法:分析了61对接受同一供体肾脏的移植受者(2012-2021年)。根据患者是先移植(K1)还是后移植(K2)将其分为两组。因此,除使用泵的时间外,每对患者的供体特征完全相同。统计分析包括 Kaplan-Meyer 分析和配对检验,包括 McNemar 检验、学生配对 t 检验或 Wilcoxon 检验(视情况而定):结果:两组受者的人口统计学特征相似(年龄、体重指数、糖尿病、透析时间、敏感性和再移植)。K1 和 K2 的冷缺血时间分别为 8.9 小时(95%CI:7.9,9.8)和 14.7 小时(13.7,15.8)(P < 0.0001)。总体而言,K2患者1年后活检证实的急性排斥反应发生率更高(P = 0.015)。与 K1(20/61,33%)相比,K2(12/61,20%)的移植物功能延迟发生率较低(P = 0.046)。最后,K2的移植物存活率高于K1(P = 0.023):我们的研究结果与之前的一项研究结果一致,后者认为较长的泵血时间可能具有优势。这两项研究都鼓励进一步研究 HMP 的潜在抗炎作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Matched pair analysis of the effect of longer hypothermic machine perfusion time on kidney transplant outcomes.

Background: Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) has demonstrated benefits in terms of early kidney transplant function compared to static cold storage. While longer preservation times have shown detrimental effects, a previous paired study indicated that longer pump times (the second kidney in a pair) might lead to improved outcomes.

Aim: To revisit the prior paired study's somewhat unexpected results by reviewing our program's experience.

Methods: A total of 61 pairs of transplant recipients who received kidneys from the same donor (2012-2021) were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they were transplanted first (K1) or second (K2). Therefore, the patients in each pair had identical donor characteristics, except for time on the pump. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meyer analysis and paired tests, including McNemar's test, student's paired t-test, or Wilcoxon's test, as appropriate.

Results: The two groups of recipients had similar demographics (age, body mass index, diabetes, time on dialysis, sensitization and retransplants). Cold ischemic times for K1 and K2 were 8.9 (95%CI: 7.9, 9.8) and 14.7 hours (13.7, 15.8) (P < 0.0001), respectively. Overall, K2 had a higher rate of freedom from biopsy-proven acute rejection at 1 year (P = 0.015). Delayed graft function was less common in K2, 12/61 (20%) than in K1, 20/61 (33%) (P = 0.046). Finally, K2 showed a higher graft survival than K1 (P = 0.023).

Conclusion: Our results agree with a previous study that suggested possible advantages to longer pump times. Both studies should encourage further research into HMP's potential anti-inflammatory effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
293
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信