2015-2022 年英格兰全科医生的工作时间和供应以及患者需求:一项回顾性研究。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-26 Print Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0075
Rosa Parisi, Yiu-Shing Lau, Peter Bower, Katherine Checkland, Jill Rubery, Matthew Sutton, Sally Giles, Aneez Esmail, Sharon Spooner, Evangelos Kontopantelis
{"title":"2015-2022 年英格兰全科医生的工作时间和供应以及患者需求:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Rosa Parisi, Yiu-Shing Lau, Peter Bower, Katherine Checkland, Jill Rubery, Matthew Sutton, Sally Giles, Aneez Esmail, Sharon Spooner, Evangelos Kontopantelis","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>English primary care faces a reduction in GP supply and increased demand.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore trends in GP working time and supply, accounting for factors influencing demand for services.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Retrospective observational study in English primary care between 2015 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Trends in median GP contracted time commitment were calculated using annual workforce datasets. Three measures of demand were calculated at practice-level: numbers of patients; numbers of older patients (≥65 years); and numbers of chronic conditions using 21 Quality and Outcomes Framework disease registers. Multi-level Poisson models were used to assess associations between GP supply and practice demand, adjusted for deprivation, region, and year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2015 and 2022, the median full-time equivalent (FTE) of a fully qualified GP decreased from 0.80 to 0.69<b>.</b> There was a 9% increase in registered population per GP FTE (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 1.14). This increase was steeper using numbers of chronic conditions (32%, IRR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.26 to 1.38). Practices in the most deprived decile had 17% more patients (IRR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.27) and 19% more chronic conditions (IRR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.33) per GP FTE, compared with the least deprived decile. These disparities persisted over time. All regions reported more chronic conditions per GP FTE than London.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Population demand per GP has increased, particularly in terms of chronic conditions. This increase is driven by several factors, including a reduction in GP contracted time commitments. Persistent deprivation gradients in GP supply highlight the need to recruit and retain GPs more equitably.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e666-e673"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GP working time and supply, and patient demand in England in 2015-2022: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Rosa Parisi, Yiu-Shing Lau, Peter Bower, Katherine Checkland, Jill Rubery, Matthew Sutton, Sally Giles, Aneez Esmail, Sharon Spooner, Evangelos Kontopantelis\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>English primary care faces a reduction in GP supply and increased demand.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore trends in GP working time and supply, accounting for factors influencing demand for services.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Retrospective observational study in English primary care between 2015 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Trends in median GP contracted time commitment were calculated using annual workforce datasets. Three measures of demand were calculated at practice-level: numbers of patients; numbers of older patients (≥65 years); and numbers of chronic conditions using 21 Quality and Outcomes Framework disease registers. Multi-level Poisson models were used to assess associations between GP supply and practice demand, adjusted for deprivation, region, and year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2015 and 2022, the median full-time equivalent (FTE) of a fully qualified GP decreased from 0.80 to 0.69<b>.</b> There was a 9% increase in registered population per GP FTE (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 1.14). This increase was steeper using numbers of chronic conditions (32%, IRR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.26 to 1.38). Practices in the most deprived decile had 17% more patients (IRR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.27) and 19% more chronic conditions (IRR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.33) per GP FTE, compared with the least deprived decile. These disparities persisted over time. All regions reported more chronic conditions per GP FTE than London.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Population demand per GP has increased, particularly in terms of chronic conditions. This increase is driven by several factors, including a reduction in GP contracted time commitments. Persistent deprivation gradients in GP supply highlight the need to recruit and retain GPs more equitably.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e666-e673\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423349/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0075\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:英国初级医疗面临全科医生供应减少和需求增加的问题:目的:探讨全科医生工作时间和供应的趋势,同时考虑影响服务需求的因素:2015年至2022年间英国初级医疗的回顾性观察研究:方法:利用年度劳动力数据集计算全科医生合同时间承诺的中位数趋势。在实践层面计算了需求的三个衡量指标:患者人数、老年患者人数(≥65 岁)以及使用 21 个 "质量与成果框架 "疾病登记册的慢性病患者人数。使用多级泊松模型评估全科医生供应与诊所需求之间的关联,并根据贫困程度、地区和年份进行调整:结果:2015 年至 2022 年间,全科医生全职当量(FTE)的中位数从 0.80 降至 0.69。每名全职全科医生的注册人口增加了 9%(发病率比 [IRR] = 1.09;95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.05 至 1.14)。慢性病患者人数的增幅更大(32%,IRR = 1.32;95% CI = 1.26 至 1.38)。与最贫困的十分位数相比,最贫困十分位数的诊所每名全职全科医生的患者人数增加了 17%(IRR = 1.17;95% CI = 1.08 至 1.27),慢性病患者人数增加了 19%(IRR = 1.19;95% CI = 1.06 至 1.33)。这些差异随着时间的推移而持续存在。与伦敦相比,所有地区每全职全科医生的慢性病发病率都更高:每名全科医生的人口需求有所增加,尤其是在慢性病方面。这一增长是由多个因素造成的,包括全科医生签约时间减少。全科医生供应方面持续存在的贫困梯度凸显了更公平地招聘和留住全科医生的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GP working time and supply, and patient demand in England in 2015-2022: a retrospective study.

Background: English primary care faces a reduction in GP supply and increased demand.

Aim: To explore trends in GP working time and supply, accounting for factors influencing demand for services.

Design and setting: Retrospective observational study in English primary care between 2015 and 2022.

Method: Trends in median GP contracted time commitment were calculated using annual workforce datasets. Three measures of demand were calculated at practice-level: numbers of patients; numbers of older patients (≥65 years); and numbers of chronic conditions using 21 Quality and Outcomes Framework disease registers. Multi-level Poisson models were used to assess associations between GP supply and practice demand, adjusted for deprivation, region, and year.

Results: Between 2015 and 2022, the median full-time equivalent (FTE) of a fully qualified GP decreased from 0.80 to 0.69. There was a 9% increase in registered population per GP FTE (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 1.14). This increase was steeper using numbers of chronic conditions (32%, IRR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.26 to 1.38). Practices in the most deprived decile had 17% more patients (IRR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.27) and 19% more chronic conditions (IRR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.33) per GP FTE, compared with the least deprived decile. These disparities persisted over time. All regions reported more chronic conditions per GP FTE than London.

Conclusion: Population demand per GP has increased, particularly in terms of chronic conditions. This increase is driven by several factors, including a reduction in GP contracted time commitments. Persistent deprivation gradients in GP supply highlight the need to recruit and retain GPs more equitably.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信