网络元分析:临床医生、决策者和方法论专家的有力工具。

IF 7.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ivan D. Florez , Juan E. De La Cruz-Mena , Areti-Angeliki Veroniki
{"title":"网络元分析:临床医生、决策者和方法论专家的有力工具。","authors":"Ivan D. Florez ,&nbsp;Juan E. De La Cruz-Mena ,&nbsp;Areti-Angeliki Veroniki","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Network Meta-analysis (NMA) is an advanced statistical method that combines direct evidence (ie, from head-to-head comparisons) and indirect evidence (ie, estimated from the direct available evidence) to obtain network estimates. NMAs are helpful to determine the comparative effectiveness of interventions that have not been directly compared and may provide more precise estimates for those comparisons that have been directly compared. NMA provides hierarchies which can be helpful for decision-making, much more in scenarios when multiple interventions exist for the same indication. In this article we provide a summary of the key concepts that users, namely, clinicians and methodologists need to consider when using an NMA to inform decision making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 111537"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network meta-analysis: a powerful tool for clinicians, decision-makers, and methodologists\",\"authors\":\"Ivan D. Florez ,&nbsp;Juan E. De La Cruz-Mena ,&nbsp;Areti-Angeliki Veroniki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Network Meta-analysis (NMA) is an advanced statistical method that combines direct evidence (ie, from head-to-head comparisons) and indirect evidence (ie, estimated from the direct available evidence) to obtain network estimates. NMAs are helpful to determine the comparative effectiveness of interventions that have not been directly compared and may provide more precise estimates for those comparisons that have been directly compared. NMA provides hierarchies which can be helpful for decision-making, much more in scenarios when multiple interventions exist for the same indication. In this article we provide a summary of the key concepts that users, namely, clinicians and methodologists need to consider when using an NMA to inform decision making.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"176 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435624002932\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435624002932","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

网络荟萃分析(NMA)是一种先进的统计方法,它将直接证据(即来自正面比较的证据)和间接证据(即从现有直接证据中估算出的证据)结合起来,以获得网络估算值。NMA 有助于确定未进行直接比较的干预措施的比较效果,并可为那些已进行直接比较的干预措施提供更精确的估计值。NMA 提供的层次结构有助于决策,尤其是在针对同一适应症存在多种干预措施的情况下。在本文中,我们总结了用户(即临床医生和方法学家)在使用 NMA 为决策提供信息时需要考虑的关键概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Network meta-analysis: a powerful tool for clinicians, decision-makers, and methodologists
Network Meta-analysis (NMA) is an advanced statistical method that combines direct evidence (ie, from head-to-head comparisons) and indirect evidence (ie, estimated from the direct available evidence) to obtain network estimates. NMAs are helpful to determine the comparative effectiveness of interventions that have not been directly compared and may provide more precise estimates for those comparisons that have been directly compared. NMA provides hierarchies which can be helpful for decision-making, much more in scenarios when multiple interventions exist for the same indication. In this article we provide a summary of the key concepts that users, namely, clinicians and methodologists need to consider when using an NMA to inform decision making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信