实施 ISBAR 沟通前后的院内交接班:重症监护室护士与普通病房护士交接班质量改进研究》。

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Marit Hegg Reime, Linda Skaug Tangvik, Mats Aleksander Kinn-Mikalsen, Tone Johnsgaard
{"title":"实施 ISBAR 沟通前后的院内交接班:重症监护室护士与普通病房护士交接班质量改进研究》。","authors":"Marit Hegg Reime, Linda Skaug Tangvik, Mats Aleksander Kinn-Mikalsen, Tone Johnsgaard","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14030154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research finds a lack of structure as well as varying and incomplete content in intrahospital handovers. This study aimed to improve intrahospital handovers by implementing structured ISBAR communication (identification, situation, background, assessment and recommendation).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quality improvement study was conducted observing 25 handovers given by nurses from the intensive care unit to nurses from general medical wards at baseline and after the implementation of the ISBAR communication tool. The 26-item ISBAR scoring tool was used to audit the handovers. In addition, the structure of the ISBAR communication and time spent on the handovers were observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant improvements from baseline to post-intervention regarding adherence to the ISBAR communication scoring tool. The structure of the handovers improved from baseline to post-intervention (<i>p</i> = 0.047). The time spent on handovers declined from baseline to post-intervention, although not significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The items in the ISBAR communication scoring tool can act as a guide for details that need to be reported during intrahospital handovers to strengthen patient safety. Future research calls for studies measuring satisfaction among nurses regarding using different handover tools and studies using multifaceted training interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417951/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intrahospital Handovers before and after the Implementation of ISBAR Communication: A Quality Improvement Study on ICU Nurses' Handovers to General Medical Ward Nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Marit Hegg Reime, Linda Skaug Tangvik, Mats Aleksander Kinn-Mikalsen, Tone Johnsgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep14030154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research finds a lack of structure as well as varying and incomplete content in intrahospital handovers. This study aimed to improve intrahospital handovers by implementing structured ISBAR communication (identification, situation, background, assessment and recommendation).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quality improvement study was conducted observing 25 handovers given by nurses from the intensive care unit to nurses from general medical wards at baseline and after the implementation of the ISBAR communication tool. The 26-item ISBAR scoring tool was used to audit the handovers. In addition, the structure of the ISBAR communication and time spent on the handovers were observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant improvements from baseline to post-intervention regarding adherence to the ISBAR communication scoring tool. The structure of the handovers improved from baseline to post-intervention (<i>p</i> = 0.047). The time spent on handovers declined from baseline to post-intervention, although not significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The items in the ISBAR communication scoring tool can act as a guide for details that need to be reported during intrahospital handovers to strengthen patient safety. Future research calls for studies measuring satisfaction among nurses regarding using different handover tools and studies using multifaceted training interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417951/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14030154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14030154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究发现,院内交接缺乏结构,内容也各不相同且不完整。本研究旨在通过实施结构化的 ISBAR 沟通(识别、情况、背景、评估和建议)来改善院内交接:这项质量改进研究观察了重症监护病房护士与普通病房护士在基线和实施 ISBAR 沟通工具后进行的 25 次交接班。伊斯巴评分工具共有 26 个项目,用于审核交接班情况。此外,还观察了 ISBAR 沟通的结构和用于交接班的时间:结果:从基线到干预后,在遵守 ISBAR 沟通评分工具方面没有明显改善。从基线到干预后,交接班的结构有所改善(p = 0.047)。从基线到干预后,用于交接班的时间有所减少,但并不明显:ISBAR沟通评分工具中的项目可作为院内交接过程中需要报告的细节的指南,以加强患者安全。未来的研究需要对护士使用不同交接班工具的满意度进行测量,并使用多方面的培训干预进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intrahospital Handovers before and after the Implementation of ISBAR Communication: A Quality Improvement Study on ICU Nurses' Handovers to General Medical Ward Nurses.

Background: Research finds a lack of structure as well as varying and incomplete content in intrahospital handovers. This study aimed to improve intrahospital handovers by implementing structured ISBAR communication (identification, situation, background, assessment and recommendation).

Methods: This quality improvement study was conducted observing 25 handovers given by nurses from the intensive care unit to nurses from general medical wards at baseline and after the implementation of the ISBAR communication tool. The 26-item ISBAR scoring tool was used to audit the handovers. In addition, the structure of the ISBAR communication and time spent on the handovers were observed.

Results: There were no significant improvements from baseline to post-intervention regarding adherence to the ISBAR communication scoring tool. The structure of the handovers improved from baseline to post-intervention (p = 0.047). The time spent on handovers declined from baseline to post-intervention, although not significantly.

Conclusions: The items in the ISBAR communication scoring tool can act as a guide for details that need to be reported during intrahospital handovers to strengthen patient safety. Future research calls for studies measuring satisfaction among nurses regarding using different handover tools and studies using multifaceted training interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信