第 3 天胚胎评估不能可靠地预测囊胚形成和指定:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1017/S0967199424000248
Michal Youngster, Maria Shvaikovsky, Sarit Avraham, Dvora Strassburger, Esti Kasterstein, Bila Maslansky, Itai Gat, Gil Yerushalmi, Yariv Gidoni, Ariel Hourvitz, Alon Kedem
{"title":"第 3 天胚胎评估不能可靠地预测囊胚形成和指定:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Michal Youngster, Maria Shvaikovsky, Sarit Avraham, Dvora Strassburger, Esti Kasterstein, Bila Maslansky, Itai Gat, Gil Yerushalmi, Yariv Gidoni, Ariel Hourvitz, Alon Kedem","doi":"10.1017/S0967199424000248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although many Fertility Centers have adopted day 5 or 6 embryo transfer policy, yet, 30% of embryo transfers in the US are performed on day 3. This is mainly due to concerns related to longer embryo culture effect and higher rates of embryo transfer cancellation on day 5, with no effect on cumulative pregnancy rate. We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing individual embryo transfer order rank, best embryo for fresh transfer and intention to freeze, of day-3 and day-5 embryos based on their morphology score. Day-3 embryos of each patient were ranked by embryologists for the order of transfer and intention to freeze, based on morphological score, blinded to actual blastulation outcome. The corresponding blastocysts were similarly ranked for the order of transfer and vitrification intention. Ranking was compared to test the predictive value of day-3 morphological assessment. Sixty patients with 784 day-3 embryos were included. There was only a moderate positive significant correlation between ranks on day-3 and ranks on day-5 [<i>r</i> = 0.662 95% CI (0.611-0.706, <i>p</i> < 0.001)]. Only 25% of the best embryos for transfer on day 3 (rank = 1) were chosen for fresh transfer on day 5. A total of 441 embryos were intended to be frozen on day 3. Of those, 201 were not transferred nor vitrified on day 5-6 (45%), 3.35 embryos per patient. No significant difference was found between average day-3 rank of embryos ranked 1, 2 (3.12 vs 4.12, <i>p</i> = 0.074) and 3 (3.12 vs 4.08, <i>p</i> = 0.082) on day-5-6. To conclude, this study brings a different perspective to the comparison of day 3 and day 5 by following each embryo's putative and actual designation. Day-3 ranking of embryo morphology did not provide a reliable prediction for blastocyst formation, transfer order and vitrification intention, and may support transfer or cryopreservation of blastocysts over cleavage stage embryos.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Day 3 embryo assessment does not provide a reliable prediction for blastocyst formation and designation: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Michal Youngster, Maria Shvaikovsky, Sarit Avraham, Dvora Strassburger, Esti Kasterstein, Bila Maslansky, Itai Gat, Gil Yerushalmi, Yariv Gidoni, Ariel Hourvitz, Alon Kedem\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0967199424000248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although many Fertility Centers have adopted day 5 or 6 embryo transfer policy, yet, 30% of embryo transfers in the US are performed on day 3. This is mainly due to concerns related to longer embryo culture effect and higher rates of embryo transfer cancellation on day 5, with no effect on cumulative pregnancy rate. We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing individual embryo transfer order rank, best embryo for fresh transfer and intention to freeze, of day-3 and day-5 embryos based on their morphology score. Day-3 embryos of each patient were ranked by embryologists for the order of transfer and intention to freeze, based on morphological score, blinded to actual blastulation outcome. The corresponding blastocysts were similarly ranked for the order of transfer and vitrification intention. Ranking was compared to test the predictive value of day-3 morphological assessment. Sixty patients with 784 day-3 embryos were included. There was only a moderate positive significant correlation between ranks on day-3 and ranks on day-5 [<i>r</i> = 0.662 95% CI (0.611-0.706, <i>p</i> < 0.001)]. Only 25% of the best embryos for transfer on day 3 (rank = 1) were chosen for fresh transfer on day 5. A total of 441 embryos were intended to be frozen on day 3. Of those, 201 were not transferred nor vitrified on day 5-6 (45%), 3.35 embryos per patient. No significant difference was found between average day-3 rank of embryos ranked 1, 2 (3.12 vs 4.12, <i>p</i> = 0.074) and 3 (3.12 vs 4.08, <i>p</i> = 0.082) on day-5-6. To conclude, this study brings a different perspective to the comparison of day 3 and day 5 by following each embryo's putative and actual designation. Day-3 ranking of embryo morphology did not provide a reliable prediction for blastocyst formation, transfer order and vitrification intention, and may support transfer or cryopreservation of blastocysts over cleavage stage embryos.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199424000248\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199424000248","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管许多生育中心已采用第 5 或第 6 天胚胎移植政策,但美国仍有 30% 的胚胎移植是在第 3 天进行的。这主要是因为人们担心胚胎培养时间过长会产生影响,而且第 5 天胚胎移植取消率较高,但对累积妊娠率没有影响。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,根据第 3 天和第 5 天胚胎的形态学评分,比较了第 3 天和第 5 天胚胎的单个胚胎移植顺序、最佳新鲜移植胚胎和意向冷冻胚胎。每位患者的第 3 天胚胎均由胚胎学家根据形态学评分排定移植顺序和冷冻意向,并对实际囊胚形成结果进行盲测。相应的囊胚也同样按移植顺序和玻璃化意向排序。通过比较排名来检验第 3 天形态学评估的预测价值。共纳入了 60 名患者的 784 个第 3 天胚胎。第 3 天的排名与第 5 天的排名之间仅存在中度正相关[r = 0.662 95% CI (0.611-0.706, p < 0.001)]。在第 3 天移植的最佳胚胎中,只有 25%(排名 = 1)被选中在第 5 天进行新鲜移植。共有 441 个胚胎打算在第 3 天冷冻。其中,201 个胚胎没有在第 5-6 天移植或玻璃化(45%),每个患者 3.35 个胚胎。第 3 天排名第 1、第 2(3.12 vs 4.12,p = 0.074)和第 3(3.12 vs 4.08,p = 0.082)的胚胎在第 5-6 天的平均排名无明显差异。总之,本研究通过跟踪每个胚胎的推定和实际指定,为第 3 天和第 5 天的比较带来了不同的视角。胚胎形态的第 3 天排序并不能可靠地预测囊胚的形成、移植顺序和玻璃化意向,可能支持移植或冷冻囊胚而非分裂期胚胎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Day 3 embryo assessment does not provide a reliable prediction for blastocyst formation and designation: a retrospective cohort study.

Although many Fertility Centers have adopted day 5 or 6 embryo transfer policy, yet, 30% of embryo transfers in the US are performed on day 3. This is mainly due to concerns related to longer embryo culture effect and higher rates of embryo transfer cancellation on day 5, with no effect on cumulative pregnancy rate. We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing individual embryo transfer order rank, best embryo for fresh transfer and intention to freeze, of day-3 and day-5 embryos based on their morphology score. Day-3 embryos of each patient were ranked by embryologists for the order of transfer and intention to freeze, based on morphological score, blinded to actual blastulation outcome. The corresponding blastocysts were similarly ranked for the order of transfer and vitrification intention. Ranking was compared to test the predictive value of day-3 morphological assessment. Sixty patients with 784 day-3 embryos were included. There was only a moderate positive significant correlation between ranks on day-3 and ranks on day-5 [r = 0.662 95% CI (0.611-0.706, p < 0.001)]. Only 25% of the best embryos for transfer on day 3 (rank = 1) were chosen for fresh transfer on day 5. A total of 441 embryos were intended to be frozen on day 3. Of those, 201 were not transferred nor vitrified on day 5-6 (45%), 3.35 embryos per patient. No significant difference was found between average day-3 rank of embryos ranked 1, 2 (3.12 vs 4.12, p = 0.074) and 3 (3.12 vs 4.08, p = 0.082) on day-5-6. To conclude, this study brings a different perspective to the comparison of day 3 and day 5 by following each embryo's putative and actual designation. Day-3 ranking of embryo morphology did not provide a reliable prediction for blastocyst formation, transfer order and vitrification intention, and may support transfer or cryopreservation of blastocysts over cleavage stage embryos.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信