仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:一家医院的初步经验。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tanweer Ahmed Naweed Bhatty, Eemaz Nathaniel, Sadaf Noureen, Nadeem Iqbal
{"title":"仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:一家医院的初步经验。","authors":"Tanweer Ahmed Naweed Bhatty, Eemaz Nathaniel, Sadaf Noureen, Nadeem Iqbal","doi":"10.12669/pjms.40.8.9188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is recommended for large Kidney Stones. It is mostly done in prone position. However, PCNL in Supine position is another safe option. Only few centers in country are doing it and so it is challenging task to adopt supine PCNL approach in an institution initially. In this study our purpose was to assess initial experience of Supine PCNL in our center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It is a preliminary retrospective study of our first fifty-one supine PCNL procedures, performed by a single Surgeon, over Twelve months period, from April 2021 to April 2022. We managed a retrospective review of patients' records. Analysis was completed by utilizing SPSS version 20. Implementation of Mean along with standard deviation values was utilized for continuous variables. While frequency/percentages represented categorical factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients mean age was 39 years, comprising of 62.74% male and 37.25% female patients. Thirty patients had their stones treated on the left side. Mean Stone burden was 3.2 cm. Most of the stones were GUYs score one and two (complexity wise). The mean procedure time 147minutes. Mean hospital stay of 2.17 days was observed in this study. Forty patients were stone free. Only seven patients (14%) had level I-II complications (Clavien-Dindo classification).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supine PCNL can be adopted safely in an institute if careful selection of patients is done before surgery. In our center it had acceptable success rates and few complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19958,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11395341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Preliminary experience in a single hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Tanweer Ahmed Naweed Bhatty, Eemaz Nathaniel, Sadaf Noureen, Nadeem Iqbal\",\"doi\":\"10.12669/pjms.40.8.9188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is recommended for large Kidney Stones. It is mostly done in prone position. However, PCNL in Supine position is another safe option. Only few centers in country are doing it and so it is challenging task to adopt supine PCNL approach in an institution initially. In this study our purpose was to assess initial experience of Supine PCNL in our center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It is a preliminary retrospective study of our first fifty-one supine PCNL procedures, performed by a single Surgeon, over Twelve months period, from April 2021 to April 2022. We managed a retrospective review of patients' records. Analysis was completed by utilizing SPSS version 20. Implementation of Mean along with standard deviation values was utilized for continuous variables. While frequency/percentages represented categorical factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients mean age was 39 years, comprising of 62.74% male and 37.25% female patients. Thirty patients had their stones treated on the left side. Mean Stone burden was 3.2 cm. Most of the stones were GUYs score one and two (complexity wise). The mean procedure time 147minutes. Mean hospital stay of 2.17 days was observed in this study. Forty patients were stone free. Only seven patients (14%) had level I-II complications (Clavien-Dindo classification).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supine PCNL can be adopted safely in an institute if careful selection of patients is done before surgery. In our center it had acceptable success rates and few complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11395341/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.8.9188\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.8.9188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)被推荐用于治疗大块肾结石。这种手术大多采用俯卧位。然而,仰卧位 PCNL 是另一种安全的选择。目前,国内只有少数几个中心采用这种方法,因此,在医疗机构中首先采用仰卧位 PCNL 方法是一项具有挑战性的任务。本研究旨在评估本中心采用仰卧位 PCNL 的初步经验:这是一项初步的回顾性研究,研究对象是我们从 2021 年 4 月到 2022 年 4 月十二个月期间由一名外科医生实施的首批 51 例仰卧位 PCNL 手术。我们对患者的病历进行了回顾性审查。分析使用 SPSS 20 版本完成。连续变量采用平均值和标准差。结果:患者平均年龄为 39 岁,其中 62.74% 为男性,37.25% 为女性。30名患者的结石位于左侧。平均结石体积为 3.2 厘米。大多数结石都是GUYs评分为1分和2分的结石(从复杂程度来看)。平均手术时间为 147 分钟。平均住院时间为 2.17 天。40 名患者无结石。只有七名患者(14%)出现了 I-II 级并发症(Clavien-Dindo 分级):结论:如果在术前对患者进行仔细筛选,可以在医院安全地采用仰卧位 PCNL。在我们中心,手术的成功率可以接受,并发症很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Preliminary experience in a single hospital.

Background and objective: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is recommended for large Kidney Stones. It is mostly done in prone position. However, PCNL in Supine position is another safe option. Only few centers in country are doing it and so it is challenging task to adopt supine PCNL approach in an institution initially. In this study our purpose was to assess initial experience of Supine PCNL in our center.

Methods: It is a preliminary retrospective study of our first fifty-one supine PCNL procedures, performed by a single Surgeon, over Twelve months period, from April 2021 to April 2022. We managed a retrospective review of patients' records. Analysis was completed by utilizing SPSS version 20. Implementation of Mean along with standard deviation values was utilized for continuous variables. While frequency/percentages represented categorical factors.

Results: Patients mean age was 39 years, comprising of 62.74% male and 37.25% female patients. Thirty patients had their stones treated on the left side. Mean Stone burden was 3.2 cm. Most of the stones were GUYs score one and two (complexity wise). The mean procedure time 147minutes. Mean hospital stay of 2.17 days was observed in this study. Forty patients were stone free. Only seven patients (14%) had level I-II complications (Clavien-Dindo classification).

Conclusion: Supine PCNL can be adopted safely in an institute if careful selection of patients is done before surgery. In our center it had acceptable success rates and few complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It is a peer reviewed medical journal published regularly since 1984. It was previously known as quarterly "SPECIALIST" till December 31st 1999. It publishes original research articles, review articles, current practices, short communications & case reports. It attracts manuscripts not only from within Pakistan but also from over fifty countries from abroad. Copies of PJMS are sent to all the import medical libraries all over Pakistan and overseas particularly in South East Asia and Asia Pacific besides WHO EMRO Region countries. Eminent members of the medical profession at home and abroad regularly contribute their write-ups, manuscripts in our publications. We pursue an independent editorial policy, which allows an opportunity to the healthcare professionals to express their views without any fear or favour. That is why many opinion makers among the medical and pharmaceutical profession use this publication to communicate their viewpoint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信