巴西血液透析患者的运动处方:范围界定综述。

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Heitor S Ribeiro, Francini P Andrade, Diogo V Leal, Juliana S Oliveira, Kenneth R Wilund, Maycon M Reboredo, João L Viana
{"title":"巴西血液透析患者的运动处方:范围界定综述。","authors":"Heitor S Ribeiro, Francini P Andrade, Diogo V Leal, Juliana S Oliveira, Kenneth R Wilund, Maycon M Reboredo, João L Viana","doi":"10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2024-0049en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exercise is being incorporated into the treatment of patients on hemodialysis; however, little is known about the major characteristics of these interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the exercise protocols prescribed for hemodialysis patients in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following JBI and Prisma-ScR guidelines. Searches were carried out in Medline, Embase and three other databases until May 2024. Other sources (websites, books and guidelines) were also investigated. Evidence from patients on hemodialysis describing exercise protocols in all settings and designs in Brazil was included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five pieces of evidence were found, resulting in 54 exercise protocols from 16 Brazilian states. Strength exercises (33.3%), followed by aerobic exercises (22.2%), were the most prescribed, mainly to be performed during dialysis (85.2%). The most prevalent professionals supervising the programs were physiotherapists and exercise physiologists (37.0% and 18.5%, respectively). All protocols implemented the principles of type and frequency training, while progression was adopted in only 53.7%. The main prescription was three times per week (88.9%). Exercise intensity was predominantly determined by subjective methods (33.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aerobic and strength exercises during dialysis were the most commonly prescribed modalities in Brazil, with the majority of programs being properly supervised by qualified professionals. However, existing protocols have not employed systematic progression throughout the intervention, which would be appropriate for providing better physiological responses and adaptations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14724,"journal":{"name":"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia","volume":"46 4","pages":"e20240049"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11420935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exercise prescriptions for patients on hemodialysis in Brazil: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Heitor S Ribeiro, Francini P Andrade, Diogo V Leal, Juliana S Oliveira, Kenneth R Wilund, Maycon M Reboredo, João L Viana\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2024-0049en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exercise is being incorporated into the treatment of patients on hemodialysis; however, little is known about the major characteristics of these interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the exercise protocols prescribed for hemodialysis patients in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following JBI and Prisma-ScR guidelines. Searches were carried out in Medline, Embase and three other databases until May 2024. Other sources (websites, books and guidelines) were also investigated. Evidence from patients on hemodialysis describing exercise protocols in all settings and designs in Brazil was included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five pieces of evidence were found, resulting in 54 exercise protocols from 16 Brazilian states. Strength exercises (33.3%), followed by aerobic exercises (22.2%), were the most prescribed, mainly to be performed during dialysis (85.2%). The most prevalent professionals supervising the programs were physiotherapists and exercise physiologists (37.0% and 18.5%, respectively). All protocols implemented the principles of type and frequency training, while progression was adopted in only 53.7%. The main prescription was three times per week (88.9%). Exercise intensity was predominantly determined by subjective methods (33.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aerobic and strength exercises during dialysis were the most commonly prescribed modalities in Brazil, with the majority of programs being properly supervised by qualified professionals. However, existing protocols have not employed systematic progression throughout the intervention, which would be appropriate for providing better physiological responses and adaptations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"e20240049\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11420935/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2024-0049en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2024-0049en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:运动正被纳入血液透析患者的治疗中;然而,人们对这些干预措施的主要特点知之甚少:描述巴西血液透析患者的运动方案:方法:根据 JBI 和 Prisma-ScR 指南进行了范围界定综述。在 Medline、Embase 和其他三个数据库中进行了检索,检索期至 2024 年 5 月。还调查了其他来源(网站、书籍和指南)。结果:结果:共发现 45 项证据,54 项运动方案来自巴西 16 个州。规定最多的是力量锻炼(33.3%),其次是有氧锻炼(22.2%),主要在透析期间进行(85.2%)。指导这些计划的最普遍的专业人员是物理治疗师和运动生理学家(分别占 37.0% 和 18.5%)。所有方案都贯彻了类型和频率训练原则,只有 53.7% 的方案采用了渐进式训练。主要处方为每周三次(88.9%)。运动强度主要由主观方法决定(33.3%):结论:在巴西,透析期间的有氧运动和力量锻炼是最常见的处方方式,大多数计划都由合格的专业人员进行适当监督。然而,现有的方案并没有在整个干预过程中采用系统的渐进方法,而这种方法适合提供更好的生理反应和适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exercise prescriptions for patients on hemodialysis in Brazil: a scoping review.

Introduction: Exercise is being incorporated into the treatment of patients on hemodialysis; however, little is known about the major characteristics of these interventions.

Objective: To describe the exercise protocols prescribed for hemodialysis patients in Brazil.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted following JBI and Prisma-ScR guidelines. Searches were carried out in Medline, Embase and three other databases until May 2024. Other sources (websites, books and guidelines) were also investigated. Evidence from patients on hemodialysis describing exercise protocols in all settings and designs in Brazil was included.

Results: Forty-five pieces of evidence were found, resulting in 54 exercise protocols from 16 Brazilian states. Strength exercises (33.3%), followed by aerobic exercises (22.2%), were the most prescribed, mainly to be performed during dialysis (85.2%). The most prevalent professionals supervising the programs were physiotherapists and exercise physiologists (37.0% and 18.5%, respectively). All protocols implemented the principles of type and frequency training, while progression was adopted in only 53.7%. The main prescription was three times per week (88.9%). Exercise intensity was predominantly determined by subjective methods (33.3%).

Conclusion: Aerobic and strength exercises during dialysis were the most commonly prescribed modalities in Brazil, with the majority of programs being properly supervised by qualified professionals. However, existing protocols have not employed systematic progression throughout the intervention, which would be appropriate for providing better physiological responses and adaptations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
208
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信